ExchangeDEX+
Buy CryptoMarketsSpotFuturesGOLDEarnEvent Center
More
Commodity Zero-Fee Gala

Lending

Lending protocols form the backbone of the decentralized money market, allowing users to lend or borrow digital assets without intermediaries. Using smart contracts, platforms like Aave and Morpho automate interest rates based on supply and demand while requiring over-collateralization for security. The 2026 lending landscape features advanced permissionless vaults and institutional-grade credit lines. This tag covers the evolution of capital efficiency, liquidations, and the integration of diverse collateral types, including LSTs and tokenized RWAs.

15560 Articles
Created: 2026/02/02 18:52
Updated: 2026/02/02 18:52
Japan's Financial Services Agency is considering strengthening regulations on cryptocurrency lending and setting investment caps for IEOs.

Japan's Financial Services Agency is considering strengthening regulations on cryptocurrency lending and setting investment caps for IEOs.

PANews reported on November 7 that, according to Coinpost, Japan's Financial Services Agency held its fifth meeting of the "Crypto Asset Regulatory Working Group" of the Financial Services Council today. The group proposed to include crypto asset lending businesses under the regulatory scope of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and to consider setting an investment cap for IEOs (Initial Exchange Offerings). Current regulatory loopholes allow lending platforms to operate without registration, placing credit and price volatility risks on users while exempting platforms from obligations such as asset segregation and storage. The new regulations will require platforms to establish robust risk management systems for re-lenders and collateral nodes, strengthen asset security management, and disclose customer risks; however, inter-institutional transactions will remain unrestricted. Regarding IEO regulation, the meeting proposed setting investment limits similar to equity crowdfunding rules (e.g., investments exceeding 500,000 yen cannot exceed 5% of annual income). However, some committee members pointed out that since IEOs immediately enter the secondary market after issuance, restricting primary market investment alone is insufficient to effectively control risk.

Author: PANews

2025/11/07

Risk-curator boom in 2025 now blamed for recent DeFi lending vault troubles

Risk-curator boom in 2025 now blamed for recent DeFi lending vault troubles

Risk curators have emerged as one of the contentious issues in DeFi, as some created high-risk vaults, leading to locked lenders with no access to liquidity.

Author: Cryptopolitan

2025/11/07

The DeFi sector had a potential $8 billion risk, but only $100 million has exploded so far?

The DeFi sector had a potential $8 billion risk, but only $100 million has exploded so far?

Fund managers, a role once trusted and then demystified in the stock market, carried the wealth dreams of countless retail investors during the A-share boom. Initially, everyone admired fund managers with prestigious university degrees and impressive resumes, believing that funds were less risky and more professional than direct stock trading. However, when the market falls, investors realize that so-called "professionalism" cannot combat systemic risks. Worse still, they receive management fees and performance bonuses, so if they make money, it's their own skill, but if they lose money, it's the investors' money. Now, the situation has become even more precarious when the role of "fund manager" has come onto the blockchain under the new name of "Curator" (external manager). They don't need to pass any qualification exams, undergo any regulatory scrutiny, or even disclose their true identities. Simply create a "vault" on a DeFi protocol and lure in hundreds of millions of dollars with outrageously high annualized returns. Investors have no idea where this money goes or what it's used for. $93 million vanished On November 3, 2025, when Stream Finance suddenly announced the suspension of all deposits and withdrawals, a storm sweeping the DeFi world was pushed to its climax. The following day, an official statement was released: an external fund manager was liquidated during the sharp market fluctuations on October 11, resulting in a loss of approximately $93 million in fund assets. Stream's internal stablecoin, xUSD, plummeted in response, crashing from $1 to a low of $0.43 within just a few hours. This storm didn't come without warning. As early as 172 days ago, Schlag, a core developer of Yearn, warned the Stream team. At the eye of the storm, he was even more outspoken: "Just one conversation with them and five minutes of browsing their Debank account is enough to realize that this is going to end badly." A conversation between Yearn Finance and Stream Finance Stream Finance is essentially a yield aggregator DeFi protocol that allows users to deposit funds into vaults managed by so-called Curators to earn yields. The protocol claims to diversify investments across various on-chain and off-chain strategies to generate returns. This scandal was caused by two main reasons: First, an external Curator used user funds to conduct opaque off-chain transactions, and its positions were liquidated on October 11. Secondly, on-chain analysts further discovered that Stream Finance also leveraged several times its capital with a small amount of real capital through recursive lending with deUSD in the Elixir protocol. This "left foot stepping on right foot to fly" model, while not the direct cause of the losses, greatly amplified the systemic risk of the protocol and laid the groundwork for the subsequent chain collapse. These two issues combined to cause a catastrophic chain reaction: $160 million in user funds were frozen, the entire ecosystem faced $285 million in systemic risk, the Euler protocol generated $137 million in bad debt, and $68 million of Elixir's deUSD, which was 65% backed by Stream assets, was hanging by a thread. So what exactly is this "Curator" model, which seasoned developers can see right through yet still attracts over $8 billion in funding? And how did it gradually push DeFi from a transparent and trustworthy ideal to today's systemic crisis? The Fatal Transformation of DeFi To understand the root of this crisis, we must go back to the origins of DeFi. The core appeal of traditional DeFi protocols like Aave and Compound lies in the principle of "Code is law." Every deposit and every loan must adhere to rules hard-coded into smart contracts, ensuring transparency and immutability. Users deposit funds into a massive public pool, while borrowers must provide substantial collateral to lend money. The entire process is algorithm-driven, with no human manager intervention. The risks are systemic and calculable, such as smart contract vulnerabilities or liquidation risks under extreme market conditions, but are by no means the human-caused risks of a particular "fund manager". However, during this period, a new generation of DeFi protocols, represented by Morpho and Euler, implemented a novel fund management approach in pursuit of higher returns. They argued that Aave's public fund pool model was inefficient, with a large amount of funds remaining idle and failing to maximize returns. Therefore, they introduced the Curator model. Instead of depositing money into a single pool, users choose individual "vaults" managed by the Curator. Users deposit money into the vaults, and the Curator is fully responsible for how to invest and generate interest on that money. The expansion speed of this model is astonishing. According to DeFiLlama data, as of now, the total value locked in the two major protocols, Morpho and Euler alone, has exceeded $8 billion, with Morpho V1 reaching $7.3 billion and Euler V2 reaching $1.1 billion. This means that more than $8 billion in real money is being managed by a large number of Curators from diverse backgrounds. This sounds wonderful: professionals doing what they do best, and users can easily obtain higher returns than Aave. But beneath the glamorous facade of "on-chain finance," its core is actually very similar to P2P lending. The core risk of P2P lending used to be that ordinary users, as investors, could not judge the true credit and repayment ability of the borrowers on the other end, and the high interest rates promised by the platforms were backed by unfathomable default risks. The Curator model perfectly replicates this. The protocol itself is just a matchmaking platform. Users' money seems to be invested in professional Curators, but in reality, it is invested in a black box. For example, on Morpho, users can see various vaults set up by different Curators on its website, each boasting an attractive APY (annualized yield) and a brief strategy description. For example, "Gauntlet" and "Steakhouse" in this picture are the curators for the corresponding vaults. Users can deposit their USDC and other assets simply by clicking "deposit." But that's precisely the problem: aside from the vague strategy description and the constantly fluctuating historical return rates, users often know nothing about the inner workings of the vault. The core information regarding the vault's risks is hidden in an inconspicuous "Risk" page. Even if a user manages to click on this page, they can only see the vault's specific holdings. Key information determining asset security, such as leverage ratios and risk exposure, remains nowhere to be found. The manager of the vault did not even submit a risk disclosure. Inexperienced users may find it difficult to assess the security of the interest-bearing assets at the bottom of the vault. Paul Frambot, CEO of Morpho, once said, "Aave is the bank, and Morpho is the infrastructure of the bank." But the subtext of this statement is that they only provide tools, while the real "banking business," namely risk management and capital allocation, is outsourced to these Curators. The so-called "decentralization" is limited to the moment of deposit and withdrawal, while the most important risk management link is completely in the hands of an unknown and unrestrained "manager". It can truly be described as: "Decentralized money transfer, centralized money management." The reason traditional DeFi protocols are relatively secure is precisely because they minimize the influence of human factors. However, the Curator model of DeFi protocols brings the greatest and most unpredictable risk—human beings—back to the blockchain. When trust replaces code, and transparency becomes a black box, the very foundation of DeFi security collapses. When the "manager" colludes with the agreement The Curator pattern merely opened Pandora's box; the tacit collusion between the parties to the agreement and the Curator completely unleashed the demons within. Curator's profit model typically involves charging management fees and performance-based commissions. This means they have a strong incentive to pursue high-risk, high-return strategies. After all, the principal belongs to the users, and they are not responsible for losses; however, they receive a large portion of the profits if they win. This incentive mechanism of "internalizing benefits and externalizing risks" is almost tailor-made for moral hazard. As Arthur, the founder of DeFiance Capital, criticized, under this model, Curators have the mentality: "If I mess up, it's your money. If I do well, it's my money." Even more alarming is that, instead of playing their role as regulators, the protocol providers have become accomplices in this dangerous game. To attract TVL (Total Value Locked) in the fiercely competitive market, they need to use astonishingly high APY (Annualized Yield) to attract users. And these high APYs are precisely created by Curators who employ aggressive strategies. Therefore, the parties to the agreement not only turn a blind eye to Curator's risky behavior, but also actively cooperate with or encourage them to open high-interest vaults as a marketing gimmick. Stream Finance is a prime example of this opaque operation. According to on-chain data analysis, Stream claims to have a total value locked (TVL) of up to $500 million, but according to DeFillama data, Stream's TVL peaked at only $200 million. This means that more than three-fifths of user funds have flowed to unknown off-chain strategies, operated by some mysterious proprietary traders, completely deviating from the transparency that DeFi should have. The statement released by RE7 Labs, a well-known Curator organization, after the Stream Finance scandal, exposed this entanglement of interests. They admitted that they had identified "centralized counterparty risk" in Stream's stablecoin xUSD through due diligence before listing it. However, due to "significant user and network demand," they decided to list the asset anyway and set up a separate lending pool for it. In other words, they chose to dance with risk in pursuit of traffic and buzz. When the agreement itself becomes an advocate and beneficiary of high-risk strategies, the so-called risk review becomes a mere scrap of paper. Users are no longer seeing genuine risk warnings, but rather an elaborate marketing scam. They are led to believe that the high APY (Average Returns) in the double or triple digits are the magic of DeFi, unaware that behind it lies a trap leading to the abyss. The collapse of dominoes On October 11, 2025, the cryptocurrency market experienced a bloodbath. In just 24 hours, nearly $20 billion was liquidated across the network. The liquidity crisis and deep losses brought about by this liquidation are emerging from DeFi. Analysis on Twitter generally suggests that many Curators of DeFi protocols tend to employ a high-risk off-chain strategy called "Selling Volatility" in pursuit of higher returns. The essence of this strategy is to gamble on market stability. As long as the market remains calm, they can continue to charge fees and make money. However, once the market fluctuates violently, they are prone to losing everything. The market crash on October 11th became the fuse that detonated this bombshell. Stream Finance was the first major domino to fall in this disaster. Although the official sources did not disclose the specific strategies employed by Curator that caused the losses, market analysis generally points to high-risk derivatives trading similar to "selling volatility." However, this was only the beginning of the disaster. Because Stream Finance's tokens, such as xUSD and xBTC, were widely used as collateral and assets in DeFi protocols, its collapse quickly triggered a chain reaction that affected the entire industry. According to preliminary analysis by DeFi research firm Yields and More, Stream's direct debt exposure is as high as $285 million, revealing a massive risk contagion network: the biggest victim is the Elixir protocol, one of Stream's major lenders, which lent it as much as $68 million in USDC, representing 65% of the total reserves of Elixir's stablecoin deUSD. RE7 Labs, a former partner, has now become a victim as well. Its vaults on multiple lending protocols face millions of dollars in bad debt risk because they accepted xUSD and Elixir-related assets as collateral. The wider contagion unfolds through a complex "double-collateralization" path, with Stream's tokens being staked in mainstream lending protocols such as Euler, Silo, and Morpho, which in turn are nested within other protocols. The failure of one node, through this spiderweb-like financial network, rapidly propagates throughout the entire system. The hidden risks planted by the October 11 liquidation event extend far beyond Stream Finance. As Yields and More warned, "This risk map is still incomplete, and we expect more affected liquidity pools and protocols to be exposed." Another protocol, Stables Labs, and its stablecoin USDX have recently experienced a similar situation and have been questioned by the community. Problems with protocols like Stream Finance have exposed the fatal flaws in this new Ce-DeFi (centrally governed decentralized finance) model: When the agreement lacks transparency and power is excessively concentrated in the hands of a few, the safety of users' funds depends entirely on the integrity of the fund manager, which is extremely risky without regulation and rules. You are the beneficiary. From Aave's transparent on-chain banking to Stream Finance's asset management black box, DeFi has undergone a fatal evolution in just a few years. When the ideal of "decentralization" is distorted into a frenzy of "deregulation," and when the narrative of "professional management" masks the opaque reality of fund operations, what we get is not better finance, but a worse banking industry. The most profound lesson from this crisis is that we must re-examine the core value of DeFi: transparency is far more important than the decentralized label itself. An opaque decentralized system is far more dangerous than a regulated centralized system. Because it lacks both the credibility and legal constraints of a centralized institution, and the open and verifiable checks and balances that a decentralized system should have. Matt Hougan, chief investment officer of Bitwise, once famously said to all investors in the crypto world: "There is no such thing as a risk-free double-digit return in the market." For every investor attracted by high APY, before clicking the "deposit" button again, they should ask themselves this question: Do you really understand where the returns on this investment come from? If you don't, then you are the returns.

Author: PANews

2025/11/07

This Week’s Hottest Crypto Presales: Data-Driven Growth and Buzz

This Week’s Hottest Crypto Presales: Data-Driven Growth and Buzz

Every week, the crypto market updates bring new names, new promises, and a flood of FOMO. Yet most retail traders still miss the early entries that turn small stakes into five-figure wins. This week’s surge in presale activity across leading crypto communities shows investors chasing projects that blend innovation, transparency, and strong yield potential. The […] The post This Week’s Hottest Crypto Presales: Data-Driven Growth and Buzz appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Author: LiveBitcoinNews

2025/11/07

This Ethereum (ETH) DeFi Crypto Could 50x by 2026

This Ethereum (ETH) DeFi Crypto Could 50x by 2026

Mutuum Finance (MUTM) surges in presale, raising $18.4M with tokens at $0.035. Built on Ethereum DeFi, analysts predict up to 50x growth potential by 2026.

Author: Blockchainreporter

2025/11/07

Elixir Stablecoin Collapses After Stream Finance Loss

Elixir Stablecoin Collapses After Stream Finance Loss

The post Elixir Stablecoin Collapses After Stream Finance Loss appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Stream’s $93 million loss caused deUSD to depeg to just 1.5 cents. Elixir revealed that Stream still owes it around $68 million and holds 90% of the remaining deUSD supply. Meanwhile, Circle called on the US Treasury to ensure equal regulatory treatment for banks, nonbanks, and stablecoin issuers as it implements the GENIUS Act. The law was signed in July, and it aims to create a clear framework for payment stablecoins. However, there is still debate over its enforcement details. Coinbase and other industry players also weighed in, and pushed for balanced oversight. Elixir Halts deUSD Support Decentralized finance (DeFi) liquidity provider Elixir suspended support for its synthetic stablecoin, deUSD, after the ripple effects of Stream Finance’s $93 million loss earlier this week. The fallout caused deUSD to lose its peg dramatically, plummeting to just 1.5 cents on the dollar, according to CoinGecko data. Elixir announced on X that it already processed redemptions for 80% of deUSD holders before the depeg occurred. However, the company attributed the collapse primarily to Stream Finance, which it said borrowed deUSD to support its own stablecoin, Staked Stream USD (XUSD). Stream halted withdrawals on Tuesday after revealing that an external fund manager suffered a $93 million loss in net assets, which left the platform with roughly $285 million in debt to multiple lenders. Of that, around $68 million is reportedly owed to Elixir. The liquidity crisis created severe knock-on effects throughout the DeFi ecosystem. Stream’s XUSD stablecoin, which relied on deUSD as part of its collateral base, fell as low as $0.10 after the losses were disclosed. The incident also severely undermined confidence in synthetic stablecoins, particularly in newer entrants like deUSD, which launched in July of 2024 to compete with Ethena Labs’ USDe.  Elixir claimed that Stream currently holds about 90% of the…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/11/07

XRP Falls 25% Over the Last Month While This New Crypto Token is Surging 250%

XRP Falls 25% Over the Last Month While This New Crypto Token is Surging 250%

The post XRP Falls 25% Over the Last Month While This New Crypto Token is Surging 250% appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The crypto market has entered an interesting phase as blue-chip assets begin to lose momentum while new DeFi projects gain traction. Ripple (XRP), one of the oldest names in the market, has seen its value slip by more than 25% in the past month, struggling to maintain upward momentum despite favorable market sentiment. Meanwhile, a fast-emerging DeFi project, Mutuum Finance (MUTM), has captured investor attention with a 250% price increase since the start of its presale. As analysts shift their focus from overextended large-cap coins to early-stage DeFi protocols, the contrast between XRP’s slowdown and MUTM’s growth has become one of the key talking points in crypto news today. Ripple (XRP) Ripple’s native token, XRP, is currently trading around $2.24, with a market capitalization between $135 billion and $180 billion. Despite holding a top position among major cryptocurrencies, its large valuation now acts as a double-edged sword. The token faces major resistance between $3.20 and $3.30, a range where multiple rallies have failed to hold. Stronger support lies near $2.90 to $3.00, but if these levels break, analysts warn XRP could slide toward $2.50. The primary issue with XRP isn’t its fundamentals,  it’s the limited upside. Its massive market cap makes triple-digit returns far harder to achieve compared to emerging projects. Investors looking for higher potential growth are increasingly turning to lower-priced alternatives with smaller market caps, where early entry can still produce significant percentage gains. Mutuum Finance (MUTM) While XRP’s growth has slowed, Mutuum Finance (MUTM) is becoming one of the best cryptocurrencies to invest in under $0.05. The project is developing a decentralized lending and borrowing ecosystem powered by smart contracts for transparency, efficiency, and sustainability. Mutuum Finance operates on two core lending models: Peer-to-Contract (P2C) and Peer-to-Peer (P2P). In the P2C model, users deposit assets into shared…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/11/07

deUSD plunges 98% as Elixir scrambles

deUSD plunges 98% as Elixir scrambles

Elixir’s deUSD stablecoin collapsed 98% to $0.03 after major exposure to Stream Finance’s $93 million loss.

Author: Cryptopolitan

2025/11/07

Elixir Protocol Ends deUSD Coin After Stream Finance Losses

Elixir Protocol Ends deUSD Coin After Stream Finance Losses

The post Elixir Protocol Ends deUSD Coin After Stream Finance Losses appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: Elixir Protocol terminates deUSD stablecoin after Stream’s loss. Stream Finance owes Elixir $68 million. DeFi platforms affected, pledging 1:1 USDC redemption. Elixir Protocol has ceased operations of its deUSD synthetic stablecoin following Stream Finance’s withdrawal suspension due to a $93 million loss, impacting decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystems involving significant collateral liquidation. This incident underscores vulnerabilities in DeFi mechanisms, reminiscent of past stablecoin failures, affecting liquidity across multiple lending platforms and sparking action to stabilize market conditions. Elixir Ends deUSD After Stream Finance’s $93M Financial Blow Elixir Protocol’s decision to end its deUSD stablecoin arises from a chain reaction initiated by Stream Finance‘s financial difficulties. Stream Finance, a key player, has disclosed a $93 million loss, owing Elixir over $68 million. Elixir has managed to process about 80% of redemption requests, with remaining holders promised a 1:1 USDC swap. Stream Finance holds 90% of the deUSD supply—approximately $75 million— which Elixir is actively working to liquidate through platforms like Euler and Morpho. The market is experiencing shifts, with lending platforms like SuiLend reporting that Elixir has repaid its USDC debts, allowing withdrawals to be restored. Decentralized exchanges and platforms are scrambling to adjust, and temporary suspensions and pauses on transactions have been recorded. The urgency of these actions highlights market volatility. Market and community reactions have been varied. SuiLend communicated their cooperation with Elixir via an official message, underscoring their restoration of USDC withdrawals following repayments. Compound implemented an emergency halt in stablecoin markets, signaling a need for caution and risk management. “Elixir announces the termination of the deUSD synthetic stablecoin, pledging a 100% redemption…All remaining deUSD and sdeUSD holders will be able to redeem at a pegged value of one US dollar.” — Elixir Protocol, Elixir Announcement deUSD’s Depreciation and the Future of Stablecoins Did you know? Echoing…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/11/07

Elixir retires deUSD after Stream’s $93M loss

Elixir retires deUSD after Stream’s $93M loss

The post Elixir retires deUSD after Stream’s $93M loss appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Decentralized finance liquidity provider Elixir has pulled the plug on its stablecoin deUSD after Stream borrowed the token to stabilize its own stablecoin. Summary Elixir declared that it would be permanently retiring its deUSD stablecoin after the collapse of its major counterparty, Stream Finance, which owes the protocol $68 million after suffering a $93 million asset loss. As part of the process, the platform has halted all minting and redemptions of deUSD and sdeUSD in USDC. So far, as much as 80% of holders have already been repaid through redemptions. On Nov. 6, Elixir announced that it would be retiring the stablecoin, stating it holds “no value and the stablecoin has been sunset.” As a result, the platform promises to conduct compensations in USDC, which is available for all deUSD holders and its derivatives including sdeUSD. Users can claim compensation for holding deUSD through the protocol’s website, which directs holders and stakers of the token to connect their wallet if they wish to claim USDC (USDC) compensations. Though, it is not currently available deUSD holders on Sui (SUI) and Sei (SEI) as well as certain Automated Market Makers and Liquidity Providers. According to data from CoinGecko, the stablecoin has depegged from the U.S dollar, having gone down in value nearly 100% in the past 24 hours. The synthetic stablecoin now holds a value of $0.026. “deUSD holds no value and the stablecoin has been sunset. Please do not buy or make investments into deUSD, including through AMMs,” said the protocol. So far, the firm has provided compensation for around 80% of current deUSD holders. However, this number does not include the tokens held by Stream Finance. According to the protocol, Stream holds approximately 90% of the remaining deUSD supply in circulation. At the moment, there are still more than 91.2…

Author: BitcoinEthereumNews

2025/11/07

Recommended by active authors

BitcoinEthereumNews
BitcoinEthereumNews
5016Articles
Cryptopolitan
Cryptopolitan
1119Articles
Coinstats
Coinstats
999Articles
PANews
PANews
978Articles

Related Tags

#Oracle#Brifge#Yield-Farming#Basis-Trading#Prediction-Market#Launchpad#Liquid-Staking#DePIN#RWA

Latest Articles

Ripple’s RLUSD Stablecoin Tops $1.2B on Ethereum

Ripple’s RLUSD Stablecoin Tops $1.2B on Ethereum

2026/02/14 17:36
Dutch Lawmakers Advance 36% Capital Gains Tax on Crypto

Dutch Lawmakers Advance 36% Capital Gains Tax on Crypto

2026/02/14 17:23
The Critical Analysis Of ADA’s Potential $2 Milestone

The Critical Analysis Of ADA’s Potential $2 Milestone

2026/02/14 17:01
TRON Explodes to $81.8B Stablecoin Record as $2.2 Trillion in Quarterly Transfers Shakes Up Global Payments

TRON Explodes to $81.8B Stablecoin Record as $2.2 Trillion in Quarterly Transfers Shakes Up Global Payments

2026/02/14 16:53
What Launched Today Platform Surpasses 1,300 Products, Offers Founders Escape from ‘Launch Void’

What Launched Today Platform Surpasses 1,300 Products, Offers Founders Escape from ‘Launch Void’

2026/02/14 16:00