The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has, on Wednesday, opened a defect investigation into the Tesla Model 3’s emergency door system, accordingThe National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has, on Wednesday, opened a defect investigation into the Tesla Model 3’s emergency door system, according

U.S. regulators are investigating 179,071 Tesla Model 3 cars from 2022 over hidden emergency door releases

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has, on Wednesday, opened a defect investigation into the Tesla Model 3’s emergency door system, according to a notice posted on its website that said the lever on these doors may be “hidden, unlabeled, and not intuitive to locate during an emergency.”

The review covers 179,071 Model 3 sedans from the 2022 model year, and comes after a petition filed by Kevin Clouse, a Tesla owner in Georgia, who said he was trapped inside his car when it caught fire in 2023.

“I was forced to climb to the back seat and break the rear passenger window with my legs to escape while the interior was burning,” said Kevin.

TeslaSource: NHTSA

NHTSA expands ongoing investigation into Tesla’s mountain of door issues

Just last September, the NHTSA opened a separate case into the Tesla Model Y after several reports of children getting stuck when the 12-volt battery died, since that makes the electric handles stop working.

The Model 3 and Model Y are the company’s best-selling cars, so these cases could impact a large group of drivers.

A Bloomberg investigation found that at least 15 people have died in the past decade in situations where Tesla doors didn’t open after a crash. Some of the deaths allegedly involved first responders unable to open the doors fast enough when the cars caught fire.

During the design phase for the Model 3, engineers flagged concerns about electric handles not working in an emergency. As previously reported by Cryptopolitan, those concerns were brought directly to Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk, who still chose to go with the same design, as long as a manual release was included.

Musk faced concerns years ago, but pushed ahead

The issue goes back to how Tesla builds its cars. The Model S, which launched in 2012, was the first model the company built from scratch. It came with flush door handles that slide out when touched. The design helped reduce wind drag and noise, but it also added complexity. If the power is cut, those electric handles don’t function.

Elon Musk admitted there were problems with these door sensors as early as 2013. “We’ve got quite a fancy door handle, and occasionally the sensor would malfunction,” he told analysts during a quarterly earnings call. “So you’d pull on the door handle, and it wouldn’t open. Obviously, it’s quite vexing for a customer.”

In 2021, Elon told analysts that the issue had been resolved. “Essentially, the door-handle incidents have gone to virtually zero.” But that’s not what Clouse and others are reporting in 2025.

After Clouse filed his petition last month, NHTSA started reviewing whether to launch a full recall. The agency hasn’t made a final decision yet, but the investigation is live. Bloomberg also confirmed details of Clouse’s 2023 fire incident, including the fact that he had to kick through a window to get out while the cabin filled with smoke.

Tesla shares dropped 0.7% at the close of the market on Christmas Eve, following a shortened session. The company has not issued a public response to the investigation. Clouse, meanwhile, is still waiting for answers.

Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It's free.

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.002135
$0.002135$0.002135
+0.42%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip

The post Gold Hits $3,700 as Sprott’s Wong Says Dollar’s Store-of-Value Crown May Slip appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Gold is strutting its way into record territory, smashing through $3,700 an ounce Wednesday morning, as Sprott Asset Management strategist Paul Wong says the yellow metal may finally snatch the dollar’s most coveted role: store of value. Wong Warns: Fiscal Dominance Puts U.S. Dollar on Notice, Gold on Top Gold prices eased slightly to $3,678.9 […] Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/gold-hits-3700-as-sprotts-wong-says-dollars-store-of-value-crown-may-slip/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:33
XRP Escrow Amendment Gains Momentum, Set for February 2026 Activation

XRP Escrow Amendment Gains Momentum, Set for February 2026 Activation

TLDR The XRP Ledger’s Token Escrow amendment has gained 82.35% consensus and is set for activation on February 12, 2026. This amendment allows users to escrow a
Share
Coincentral2026/01/31 01:00