ExchangeDEX+

Buy Crypto Markets Spot Futures500X Earn Events

Gold Bar & BTC Giveaway2000g

Cypress tests often become flaky when developers assume cy.wait('@alias') waits for every new request. It doesn’t. Aliases capture only the first match, so later waits may resolve instantly. The fix: re-intercept before each occurrence or use times: 1 to create one-shot intercepts that “consume” themselves. But the real solution is avoiding network waits altogether. Instead, rely on user-visible, accessible UI states (spinners, aria-busy, disabled buttons, status messages). This makes tests stable, realistic, and far more reliable than waiting on network events.Cypress tests often become flaky when developers assume cy.wait('@alias') waits for every new request. It doesn’t. Aliases capture only the first match, so later waits may resolve instantly. The fix: re-intercept before each occurrence or use times: 1 to create one-shot intercepts that “consume” themselves. But the real solution is avoiding network waits altogether. Instead, rely on user-visible, accessible UI states (spinners, aria-busy, disabled buttons, status messages). This makes tests stable, realistic, and far more reliable than waiting on network events.

Achieving Reliable E2E Tests in Cypress: Overcome cy.wait Pitfalls

2025/11/26 13:14

Cypress gives frontend engineers a superpower: the ability to write E2E tests that watch our app behave just like a real user would. But with great power comes… well, a lot of subtle flakiness if you’re not careful.

The `cy.wait` Illusion: What's Really Happening

The scenario is simple: you have a component that loads data, and after a user action, it loads new data using the same API endpoint. To ensure the new data has arrived, you intercept the request and then use cy.wait('@requestAlias') multiple times.

// A common, flawed approach: cy.intercept('GET', '/api/items/*', { fixture: 'item-1' }).as('getItems'); cy.visit('/items'); // 1. Wait for the initial load cy.wait('@getItems'); // ... User performs an action that triggers the SAME request ... // 2. Wait for the second load cy.wait('@getItems'); // <-- THIS IS THE PROBLEM

The Flaw

Cypress's cy.intercept logic is designed to capture a single match for an alias. When you call cy.wait('@getItems') for the first time, it finds the initial request, waits for its resolution, and then the alias is fulfilled.

When you call cy.wait('@getItems') a second time, Cypress does not reset the listener. Instead, it checks if a request has already been resolved with that alias. Because the first request has resolved, the second cy.wait command resolves immediately, without waiting for the new network call to finish. Your test is now racing against the network, not waiting for it.

Fix #1: Re-intercept before each expected request

(Works, explicit, but verbose)

cy.intercept('GET', '/api/items').as('getItems_1') cy.get('[data-testid=refresh]').click() cy.wait('@getItems_1') cy.intercept('GET', '/api/items').as('getItems_2') cy.get('[data-testid=load-more]').click() cy.wait('@getItems_2')

Clear, deterministic, but repetitive.

Fix #2: Use `times: 1` to force Cypress to “consume” intercepts

(Cleaner: Cypress forgets the intercept after one match)

This is the missing tool many engineers don’t realize exists.

cy.intercept({ method: 'GET', pathname: '/api/items', times: 1 }).as('getItems') // trigger request 1 cy.get('[data-testid=refresh]').click() cy.wait('@getItems') cy.intercept({ method: 'GET', pathname: '/api/items', times: 1 }).as('getItems') // trigger request 2 cy.get('[data-testid=load-more]').click() cy.wait('@getItems')

Why this works:

times: 1 means Cypress removes the intercept after a single matching request
Re-declaring the intercept creates a fresh listener
Each cy.wait('@getItems') now truly waits for the next occurrence

This technique gives you explicit, occurrence-specific intercepts without alias clutter. For tests that must assert network behavior (payloads, headers, error flows), it’s a clean and robust pattern.

Fix #3: Stop waiting for requests altogether

(The best fix. UI > network.)

Here’s the golden rule:

That means the most stable tests assert what the user sees:

A loading spinner appears → disappears
A button becomes disabled → enabled
A success message appears when an action is complete.
The newly loaded element is now visible in the DOM.

Example with user-visible cues:

cy.get('[data-testid=refresh]').click() cy.get('[data-testid=spinner]').should('exist') cy.get('[data-testid=spinner]').should('not.exist') cy.get('[data-testid=item-list]') .children() .should('have.length.at.least', 1)

No reliance on internal network timing. No alias lifecycle. Zero flake.

Accessibility makes this even more robust

Accessible UI patterns make great Cypress hooks:

`aria-busy` attribute

<ul data-testid="item-list" aria-busy="true">

Test:

cy.get('[data-testid=item-list]').should('have.attr', 'aria-busy', 'false')

`role="status"` with live regions

<div role="status" aria-live="polite" data-testid="status"> Loading… </div>

Test:

cy.get('[data-testid=status]').should('contain', 'Loaded 10 items')

Disabled states for actions

cy.get('[data-testid=submit]').should('be.disabled') cy.get('[data-testid=submit]').should('not.be.disabled')

These patterns aid screen reader users and produce stable, deterministic E2E tests.

When waiting for requests is appropriate

There ARE valid scenarios:

Asserting payloads or query params
Mocking backend responses
Validating request ordering
Verifying retry logic
Testing error handling flows

For those cases: Combine times: 1 with explicit, fresh intercepts defined right before triggers.

For other cases: the test should rely on the UI state.

A combined real-world example

(Network + UI, the best of both worlds)

// UI-driven loading signal cy.get('[data-testid=create]').click() cy.get('[data-testid=spinner]').should('exist') // Network contract check cy.intercept({ method: 'POST', pathname: '/api/items', times: 1 }).as('postItem') cy.get('[data-testid=create]').click() cy.wait('@postItem') .its('request.body') .should('deep.include', { title: 'New item' }) // Final user-visible assertion cy.get('[data-testid=status]').should('contain', 'Item created')

The network part is accurate. The UI part is resilient. The test is rock-solid.

Final checklist

For accessible, deterministic, non-flaky Cypress tests

Prefer user-visible UI state, not network events
Use aria-busy, role="status", aria-live, and disabled states
When waiting for requests:
Re-intercept before each occurrence, OR
Use times: 1 to auto-expire the intercept
Avoid global, long-lived intercepts
Never assume cy.wait('@alias') waits “for the next request”
Make loading and completion states accessible (good for tests, good for users)

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.