A crypto venture linked to U.S. President Donald Trump, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) is being accused of unlawful fund withholding. Bruno Skvorc, a developer of that Polygon, accuses WLFI of embezzling his money by declining to issue his tokens. This event has caused ardent debate about the application of compliance tools in blockchain projects. Skvorc […]A crypto venture linked to U.S. President Donald Trump, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) is being accused of unlawful fund withholding. Bruno Skvorc, a developer of that Polygon, accuses WLFI of embezzling his money by declining to issue his tokens. This event has caused ardent debate about the application of compliance tools in blockchain projects. Skvorc […]

WLFI Accused of Withholding Funds in Token Freeze Controversy: Report

2025/09/07 03:00
3 min read
WLFI
  • WLFI, linked to Donald Trump, faces accusations of unlawfully withholding funds from developer Bruno Skvorc.
  • Skvorc’s wallet was flagged as “high risk,” causing frustration over the token withholding and compliance tools.
  • Tron’s Justin Sun joins critics, calling WLFI’s token freeze “unreasonable” and against blockchain’s core values.

A crypto venture linked to U.S. President Donald Trump, World Liberty Financial (WLFI) is being accused of unlawful fund withholding. Bruno Skvorc, a developer of that Polygon, accuses WLFI of embezzling his money by declining to issue his tokens. This event has caused ardent debate about the application of compliance tools in blockchain projects.

Skvorc has provided a copy of an email sent by the compliance team at WLFI on X that showed his wallet address was considered a high risk. The project team attributed that his tokens will stay locked in because of blockchain exposure. Skvorc was frustrated, referring to the situation as a new age mafia in which there was no one to complain to, no one to sue.

Flawed Compliance Freezes Tokens, Sparks Controversy

The developer went further to state that he was among six investors who had been offered 100% token lockups since its inception. He defended that taking money out of his wallet was not a high-risk action. But it was now thought unsafe to address the owed tokens to the same address.

Also Read: WLFI Resistance Test: Can Bulls Break $0.23, or Will Bears Dominate?

ZachXBT, one blockchain researcher, weighed in on the situation, dismissing the issue of the flawed compliance tools. He observed that these robots easily falsely categorize addresses belonging to wallets due to minor causes, such as communicating with decentralized finance (DeFi) contracts. Such errors may result in inappropriate freezing of assets, as experienced in Skvors’ case.

This wallet of Skvorc had been blocked because of previous activity in crypto mixer Tornado cash. Moreover, it also had indirect connections with approved organizations such as Garantex and Netex24. An earlier engagement with one of the blacklisted dashboards was also raised in the compliance tool.

WLFI Controversy Grows as Skvorc and Sun Criticize Freezes

Skvorc is a Croatian blockchain developer involved in Ethereum 2.0 and his company, RMRK, which places multi-resource NFTs into gaming metaverses. Other people in the crypto community have taken notice of his allegations against WLFI.

Tron founder Justin Sun also announced his WLFI tokens were frozen following a big transaction of $9 million that automatically generated a flag. Sun described the freeze as unreasonable and said it contradicted the principles of blockchain. He pointed out that access to tokens is to be seen as sacred and inviolable.

The controversy around WLFI also continues to expand as additional investors express their concerns. The application of compliance tools and the relationship between the project and influential people will probably be actively discussed. As the situation continues to unfold, there can be a permanent negative impact on the reputation of WLFI in the crypto market.

Also Read: WLFI Crashes to $0.181562 After 2.9 Billion Tokens Frozen

Market Opportunity
Union Logo
Union Price(U)
$0.001536
$0.001536$0.001536
+7.33%
USD
Union (U) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum

The post Crypto whale loses $6M to sneaky phishing scheme targeting staked Ethereum appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A crypto whale lost more than $6 million in staked Ethereum (stETH) and Aave-wrapped Bitcoin (aEthWBTC) after approving malicious signatures in a phishing scheme on Sept. 18, according to blockchain security firm Scam Sniffer. According to the firm, the attackers disguised their move as a routine wallet confirmation through “Permit” signatures, which tricked the victim into authorizing fund transfers without triggering obvious red flags. Yu Xian, founder of blockchain security company SlowMist, noted that the victim did not recognize the danger because the transaction required no gas fees. He wrote: “From the victim’s perspective, he just clicked a few times to confirm the wallet’s pop-up signature requests, didn’t spend a single penny of gas, and $6.28 million was gone.” How Permit exploits work Permit approvals were originally designed to simplify token transfers. Instead of submitting an on-chain approval and paying fees, a user can sign an off-chain message authorizing a spender. That efficiency, however, has created a new attack surface for malicious players. Once a user signs such a permit, attackers can combine two functions—Permit and TransferFrom—to drain assets directly. Because the authorization takes place off-chain, wallet dashboards show no unusual activity until the funds move. As a result, the assets are gone when the approval executes on-chain, and tokens are redirected to the attacker’s wallet. This loophole has made permit exploits increasingly attractive for malicious actors, who can siphon millions without needing complex hacks or high-cost gas wars. Phishing losses The latest theft highlights a wider trend of escalating phishing campaigns. Scam Sniffer reported that in August alone, attackers stole $12.17 million from more than 15,200 victims. That figure represented a 72% jump in losses compared with July. According to the firm, the most significant share of August’s damages came from three large accounts that accounted for nearly half…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 02:31
Why is the Trump-backed WLFI Token Price Up Today?

Why is the Trump-backed WLFI Token Price Up Today?

The post Why is the Trump-backed WLFI Token Price Up Today? appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News World Liberty Financial’s native token WLFI, backed by the
Share
CoinPedia2026/02/09 18:54
Unlock 24/7 Crypto Blackjack Customer Support Now

Unlock 24/7 Crypto Blackjack Customer Support Now

Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions Cryptsy - Latest Cryptocurrency News and Predictions - Experts in Crypto Casinos Did you know BC.Game supports
Share
Cryptsy2026/02/09 19:33