BitcoinWorld Yen Carry Trade Faces Perilous Unwinding as Apollo’s Slok Issues Stark Warning NEW YORK, March 2025 – Global financial markets face a significant BitcoinWorld Yen Carry Trade Faces Perilous Unwinding as Apollo’s Slok Issues Stark Warning NEW YORK, March 2025 – Global financial markets face a significant

Yen Carry Trade Faces Perilous Unwinding as Apollo’s Slok Issues Stark Warning

2026/02/03 00:10
6 min read
Analyst Torsten Slok warns of yen carry trade risks impacting global currency markets.

BitcoinWorld

Yen Carry Trade Faces Perilous Unwinding as Apollo’s Slok Issues Stark Warning

NEW YORK, March 2025 – Global financial markets face a significant inflection point as Apollo Global Management’s Chief Economist, Torsten Slok, issues a stark warning about the potential unwinding of the decades-old yen carry trade, a development that could trigger substantial volatility across currency, bond, and equity markets worldwide. This caution comes amid shifting monetary policy dynamics and evolving global economic conditions that challenge the foundational assumptions of one of finance’s most persistent strategies.

Understanding the Yen Carry Trade Mechanism

The yen carry trade represents a cornerstone of global currency speculation and investment strategy. Fundamentally, investors borrow Japanese yen at historically low interest rates. Subsequently, they convert this capital into higher-yielding assets denominated in other currencies. This strategy profits from the interest rate differential, or “carry.” For decades, the Bank of Japan’s ultra-accommodative policy has sustained this environment. However, monetary policy normalization now threatens its stability. Consequently, a rapid reversal could have cascading effects.

Key components of the trade include:

  • Funding Currency: The Japanese yen, due to persistently low rates.
  • Target Assets: Often U.S. Treasuries, Australian bonds, or emerging market debt.
  • Profit Source: The spread between the yield on the target asset and the cost of yen borrowing.
  • Primary Risk: Yen appreciation, which increases repayment costs.

The Historical Context and Scale

Market participants have utilized the yen carry trade extensively since the late 1990s. The Bank of Japan’s zero-interest-rate policy, initiated in 1999, and subsequent quantitative easing programs created a perfect funding environment. Estimates suggest trillions of yen in speculative positions support global asset prices. Therefore, any disorderly unwind poses systemic risks. The 2008 financial crisis provided a precedent, causing a violent yen surge as traders rushed to cover short positions.

Torsten Slok’s Analysis and Warning Signals

Torsten Slok, a respected voice in macroeconomic analysis, highlights several converging factors that elevate the risk profile. Firstly, the Bank of Japan has cautiously moved toward policy normalization. It has incrementally adjusted its Yield Curve Control framework. Secondly, global inflation trends, though moderating, remain above pre-pandemic levels. This pressures other central banks to maintain higher rates. Thirdly, geopolitical tensions and fiscal concerns influence currency volatility. Slok emphasizes that these conditions create a fragile equilibrium.

“The asymmetry of risks has shifted dramatically,” Slok noted in recent client communications. “For years, the carry trade provided steady returns with manageable risk. Now, the potential for a sharp, policy-driven yen appreciation presents a clear and present danger to leveraged positions.” His analysis points to rising hedging costs and increased options market activity betting on yen strength as early warning signs.

Potential Global Market Impacts

An unwinding of the yen carry trade would transmit shocks through multiple channels. A rapid appreciation of the yen would force leveraged investors to sell their higher-yielding assets to cover losses and repay loans. This could lead to a sudden tightening of financial conditions in recipient markets.

Potential Impact Channels of a Yen Carry Trade Unwind
MarketPrimary ImpactSecondary Effect
Global Bond MarketsRising yields as carry trade assets are soldIncreased borrowing costs for governments and corporations
Emerging Market CurrenciesDepreciation against a strengthening yen and dollarCapital outflows and potential balance of payments stress
Equity MarketsVolatility spike and potential downturn in sectors reliant on cheap fundingReduced risk appetite and lower valuations
Foreign Exchange (Forex)Increased volatility and dislocation in major currency pairsBroader loss of confidence in currency stability

Furthermore, emerging economies often reliant on foreign capital inflows could face abrupt reversals. This dynamic echoes past episodes of financial stress in Asia and Latin America. Meanwhile, Japanese financial institutions and exporters would experience mixed effects. A stronger yen benefits importers but hurts the competitive position of export giants like Toyota and Sony.

The Bank of Japan’s Delicate Balancing Act

The Bank of Japan (BOJ) navigates a complex policy path. On one hand, domestic inflation finally approaches its sustained 2% target, justifying policy normalization. On the other hand, officials remain acutely aware of the global ramifications of a stronger yen. Governor Kazuo Ueda has consistently communicated a gradual, data-dependent approach. However, market expectations can shift faster than policy. A single hint of accelerated tightening could trigger the very unwind the BOJ hopes to avoid.

Investor Positioning and Risk Mitigation Strategies

Institutional investors have reportedly begun adjusting their portfolios in anticipation of heightened volatility. Risk mitigation strategies now include:

  • Increased Hedging: Using forex derivatives to lock in exchange rates.
  • Portfolio Diversification: Reducing concentrated exposure to carry-trade-sensitive assets.
  • Liquidity Management: Holding higher cash reserves to meet potential margin calls.
  • Scenario Analysis: Stress-testing portfolios against various yen appreciation speeds.

Market analysts observe that the VIX index, a measure of U.S. stock market volatility, and currency volatility indices remain correlated. This suggests that forex moves could quickly spill into other asset classes. Therefore, a defensive posture is becoming more common among global macro funds.

Conclusion

Torsten Slok’s warning about the yen carry trade underscores a critical vulnerability in the global financial architecture. The strategy’s longevity has bred complacency, but shifting monetary tides now expose its inherent risks. While a disorderly unwind is not a foregone conclusion, the preconditions are undeniably present. Market participants must therefore monitor BOJ communications, global inflation data, and capital flow trends with heightened vigilance. The stability of currency markets, and by extension global asset prices, may hinge on a smooth transition away from this era of ultra-cheap yen funding. The yen carry trade’s potential unwinding represents a pivotal test for policymakers and investors alike in 2025.

FAQs

Q1: What exactly is a “yen carry trade”?
A yen carry trade is an investment strategy where traders borrow Japanese yen at low interest rates and invest the proceeds in higher-yielding assets elsewhere, profiting from the interest rate differential.

Q2: Why is there a risk of it unwinding now?
The risk has increased due to the Bank of Japan’s gradual move toward ending its ultra-loose monetary policy, which could lead to higher yen borrowing costs and yen appreciation, eroding carry trade profits.

Q3: Who is Torsten Slok and why is his warning significant?
Torsten Slok is the Chief Economist at Apollo Global Management, a major global asset manager. His analysis carries weight due to Apollo’s market position and his expertise in macroeconomic and credit trends.

Q4: How would a carry trade unwind affect the average investor?
It could lead to increased volatility in global stock and bond markets, potentially affecting retirement and investment portfolios through wider spreads, lower asset prices, and reduced market liquidity.

Q5: What are the signs that an unwind is beginning?
Key signs include a rapid, sustained appreciation of the yen against major currencies, a spike in currency volatility, rising costs to hedge yen exposure, and simultaneous selling pressure in assets popular with carry traders.

This post Yen Carry Trade Faces Perilous Unwinding as Apollo’s Slok Issues Stark Warning first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00