The post Crypto Market Loses $250B as US Liquidity Dries Up, Not a BTC Crisis: Analyst appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key insights The crypto market lost $The post Crypto Market Loses $250B as US Liquidity Dries Up, Not a BTC Crisis: Analyst appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key insights The crypto market lost $

Crypto Market Loses $250B as US Liquidity Dries Up, Not a BTC Crisis: Analyst

Key insights

  • The crypto market lost $250 billion in value over the weekend, Raoul Pal said.
  • Bitcoin (BTC) price traded near $75,969 as traders focused on U.S. liquidity conditions.
  • On-chain claims about Binance selling spread, but no verified totals appeared.

The latest crypto market news framed the weekend selloff as a U.S. liquidity shortage, not crypto damage. Pal, chief executive of Global Macro Investor, said macro plumbing drove the drawdown.

He said Bitcoin fell alongside Software as a Service stocks, weakening a crypto-only story. That framing mattered because it shifted blame from tokens to funding conditions.

Pal said gold’s rally pulled marginal liquidity away from risk assets. The crypto news cycle then treated the drop as a macro stress event.

Crypto Market News Points To SaaS Correlation, Not Sector Failure

Pal said Bitcoin and Software as a Service equities tracked the same path. He described both as long-duration assets sensitive to interest rates.

Pal said investors discounted future adoption when liquidity tightened.

UBS Saas Index vs BTC | Source: X

He said the shared decline challenged claims that crypto market broke. Besides, he noted that the traders also blamed new artificial intelligence tools for software weakness. He said those parallel narratives relied on headlines, not cross-asset behavior.

Pal compared the UBS SaaS Index with BTC price slide to support correlation. He said two unrelated markets sold off together, implying one dominant driver.

He argued that the driver came from U.S. liquidity, not crypto market mechanics. Pal said commentators pushed multiple culprits as prices fell.

He said some blamed exchange dynamics and large institutions for the drawdown. He said the correlation made those explanations incomplete.

Pal said global liquidity measures usually tracked Bitcoin and major technology indexes. He said U.S. total liquidity dominated this phase of the cycle. He said the United States provided key global liquidity at turning points.

Pal linked weak liquidity to soft Institute for Supply Management surveys. He urged patience to the crypto market traders as time passed.

US Liquidity Plumbing Drives The Crypto Market Drawdown

Pal said two government shutdowns worsened a temporary liquidity drain. He said issues in U.S. plumbing amplified the crypto market shock. He said the Reverse Repo Facility drain completed in 2024.

US Liquidity Impact on Crypto Market | Source: X

He said Treasury General Account rebuilds once paired with Reverse Repo drawdowns. He said the empty Reverse Repo pool removed that offset. Pal also noted that those rebuilds then became pure liquidity drains.

Pal said the U.S. Treasury’s behavior during shutdowns added pressure. He said Treasury avoided drawing down the cash account after the last shutdown. In addition, he said Treasury instead added to it, extending the drain.

The expert explained that the gold rally absorbed remaining marginal liquidity across markets. He said Bitcoin and Software as a Service stocks suffered as risk assets. He said investors hit the riskiest assets first.

The weekend drawdown removed $250 billion from total crypto market capitalization, Pal said. He framed the move as an air pocket, not a cycle break. He said liquidity constraints produced brutal price action.

Crypto News Tests Warsh Fears And Exchange Dump Claims

Jeff Mei, chief operations officer at BTSE, said traders feared a hawkish Federal Reserve chair. He said markets expected slower interest-rate cuts under Kevin Warsh. He said that impression pressured crypto market risk appetite.

Pal rejected that view and called the hawk label outdated. He said Warsh followed a Greenspan-era playbook of rate cuts. He said policymakers let growth run hot and watched inflation.

Pal said artificial intelligence productivity gains constrained inflation in that playbook. He said Warsh avoided balance sheet shocks because reserves constrained banks. He said policy mechanics mattered more than personalities.

Pal said Warsh cut rates and avoided other interventions. He said Donald Trump and Scott Bessent ran liquidity through banks. He said officials also pursued a full reduction in the enhanced Supplementary Leverage Ratio.

Pal said the shutdown would resolve this week and clear the last hurdle. He said a partial Treasury cash drawdown then returned liquidity. He said fiscal stimulus and rate cuts also supported liquidity later.

BTC Price Slips | Source: X

Separately, DeFiTracer claimed Binance liquidated millions of dollars in the crypto market. The post said Binance dumped Bitcoin and Ethereum every few minutes. The claim cited no transaction hashes or exchange statements.

Those competing narratives left traders watching near-term liquidity signals. Pal said the liquidity drain neared its end after shutdown resolution. Bitcoin’s next move then still hinged on cash conditions, not crypto news.

Source: https://www.thecoinrepublic.com/2026/02/02/crypto-market-loses-250b-as-us-liquidity-dries-up-not-a-btc-crisis-analyst/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00