Written by: Zhang Yaqi, Wall Street Insights Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, attributed its record-breaking $19 billion liquidation on OctoberWritten by: Zhang Yaqi, Wall Street Insights Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, attributed its record-breaking $19 billion liquidation on October

Binance released a "10.10 Clearance" report; Changpeng Zhao denied profiting, while Xu Mingxing accused the company of marketing activities leading to [the sell-off].

2026/02/02 10:00
6 min read

Written by: Zhang Yaqi, Wall Street Insights

Binance, the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange, attributed its record-breaking $19 billion liquidation on October 10 last year to a combination of macroeconomic risks, high leverage, and liquidity shortages, denying that a core trading system malfunction was the main cause. However, this explanation failed to quell industry doubts about its marketing strategies and market influence.

Binance released a 10.10 Clearance report; Changpeng Zhao denied profiting, while Xu Mingxing accused the company of marketing activities leading to [the sell-off].

Binance released a report on Saturday stating that global markets were already under pressure due to news of Trump's tariffs, and that over $100 billion in open interest in Bitcoin derivatives, a rapidly shrinking order book, and blockchain congestion triggered a chain of liquidations. The exchange acknowledged issues specific to two platforms but emphasized that approximately 75% of the liquidations occurred before its index deviations and that it had already compensated users over $328 million.

Binance co-founder Changpeng Zhao denied during a live Q&A session on Friday that the platform was a key driver of the liquidation wave, calling the allegations "far-fetched." He stated that users who suffered losses due to platform system issues have been compensated, and that Binance, as a company regulated by Abu Dhabi and still under US government oversight, operates with transparency.

However, OKX CEO Xu Mingxing, following Zhao Changpeng's remarks, accused Binance of "irresponsible marketing campaigns" that triggered the crash, particularly the promotion of high-yield products for the USDe stablecoin. He stated that as the largest global platform, Binance possesses "enormous influence and corresponding industry leadership responsibility." Bitcoin has been struggling since its October crash, currently trading at approximately 36% below its all-time high.

Macroeconomic shocks trigger liquidity crunch

Binance detailed the mechanisms behind the market crash on October 10th in its report. Tariff-related news had already put pressure on global markets that day, and the sustained rise in Bitcoin and Ethereum over the previous months had led to highly leveraged and concentrated exposure among traders. With over $100 billion in open interest in Bitcoin futures and options, the conditions were ripe for forced deleveraging.

The sell-off quickly became self-reinforcing. As prices fell, market makers activated automatic risk controls and reduced their exposure, withdrawing liquidity from their order books. Binance, citing Kaiko data, reported that during peak volatility, buy depth on several major exchanges virtually disappeared. With few orders, even small-scale liquidations could significantly depress prices.

This turmoil wasn't limited to the cryptocurrency market. US stocks lost approximately $1.5 trillion that day, with the S&P 500 and Nasdaq recording their biggest single-day drops in six months. Binance stated that approximately $150 billion in systemic liquidations occurred globally that day.

Blockchain congestion exacerbated the pressure. Ethereum gas fees (transaction fees for on-chain activity) surged to over 100 gwei at one point, slowing down transfer speeds and limiting cross-exchange arbitrage. As funds could not move quickly, price gaps widened, and liquidity became even more fragmented.

Platform Issues and Compensation Plan

Binance acknowledged two platform-specific incidents during the crash, but stated that neither incident led to broader market volatility.

The first incident involved a slowdown in the internal asset transfer system between 21:18 and 21:51 UTC, affecting transfers between spot, wealth management, and futures accounts. The core trading system remained operational, but some users temporarily saw a zero balance due to a backend timeout. Binance stated that the issue stemmed from a database performance degradation caused by a surge in traffic, and it has since been fixed; affected users have been compensated.

The second incident involved temporary discrepancies in the indices of USDe, WBETH, and BNSOL between 21:36 and 22:15 UTC, occurring after most liquidations had been completed. Binance stated that scarce liquidity and delays in cross-exchange rebalancing caused localized price fluctuations that disproportionately impacted the index calculations. The exchange has implemented methodological adjustments, and affected users have been compensated.

Binance emphasized that approximately 75% of the liquidations occurred before the index deviation, indicating that the initial macroeconomic shock was the primary driving factor. The exchange stated that it compensated users a total of over $328 million and launched additional support programs to stabilize participants affected by the crash. Binance's total compensation to customers and businesses following the crash was approximately $600 million.

Zhao Changpeng denies platform responsibility

During a live Q&A session on Binance's social media platform on Friday, Changpeng Zhao stated that persistent accusations that Binance bore primary responsibility for the cryptocurrency market crash last October were "far-fetched." He denied that Binance was a key driver of the record-breaking wave of liquidations and stated that users who suffered losses in the October market crash due to platform system issues have been compensated.

Changpeng Zhao stepped down as CEO in November 2023 as part of a U.S. law enforcement settlement, admitting he failed to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program. Parent company Binance Holdings agreed to hire an independent external compliance monitor. Zhao received a pardon from President Trump last October.

Changpeng Zhao stated that a group of people still claim the crash was caused by Binance and want the platform to "compensate for everything." He emphasized that Binance is a regulated company in Abu Dhabi, and authorities have access to its activities; the US government is still monitoring the platform. According to a Bloomberg report last September, Binance was close to reaching a potential agreement with the US Department of Justice, which would allow it to waive oversight requirements.

Xu Mingxing: "It's because Binance was irresponsible."

Following Changpeng Zhao's remarks on Friday, accusations regarding Binance's role in the market crash continue. Xu Mingxing posted on the X platform, stating, "As the largest global platform, Binance, as an industry leader, possesses immense influence and corresponding responsibility."

Xu Mingxing posted on Friday, stating, "There's no complexity, no surprise. October 10th was caused by the irresponsible marketing campaigns of certain companies." He accused Binance of triggering a chain reaction of liquidations by launching its high-yield USDe stablecoin product in September. This product allowed users to earn a 12% annualized yield on Ethena Labs' USDe stablecoin during a promotional period, using the stablecoin as collateral.

Xu Mingxing stated that the product carries "hedge fund-level risks." He believes that traders, misunderstanding the risks of using USDe as collateral to borrow and increase their bets, are trapped in a "leverage cycle." He claims that "even small market shocks are enough to trigger a collapse," and when "volatility strikes, USDe quickly de-pegs," leading to liquidation. Xu Mingxing stated:

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Optimizely Named a Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Personalization Engines

Optimizely Named a Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Personalization Engines

Company recognized as a Leader for the second consecutive year NEW YORK, Feb. 5, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — Optimizely, the leading digital experience platform (DXP) provider
Share
AI Journal2026/02/06 00:47
Elizabeth Warren raises ethics concerns over White House crypto czar David Sacks’ tenure

Elizabeth Warren raises ethics concerns over White House crypto czar David Sacks’ tenure

The post Elizabeth Warren raises ethics concerns over White House crypto czar David Sacks’ tenure appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Democratic lawmakers pressed David Sacks, President Donald Trump’s “crypto and AI czar,” on Sept. 17 to disclose whether he has exceeded the time limits of his temporary White House appointment, raising questions about possible ethics violations. In a letter signed by Senator Elizabeth Warren and seven other members of Congress, the lawmakers said Sacks may have surpassed the 130-day cap for Special Government Employees, a category that allows private-sector professionals to serve the government on a part-time or temporary basis. The Office of Government Ethics sets the cap to minimize conflicts of interest, as SGEs are permitted to continue receiving outside salaries while in government service. Warren has previously raised similar concerns around Sacks’ appointment. Conflict-of-interest worries Sacks, a venture capitalist and general partner at Craft Ventures, has played a high-profile role in shaping Trump administration policy on digital assets and artificial intelligence. Lawmakers argued that his private financial ties to Silicon Valley raise serious ethical questions if he is no longer within the bounds of SGE status. According to the letter: “When issuing your ethics waiver, the White House noted that the careful balance in conflict-of-interest rules for SGEs was reached with the understanding that they would only serve the public ‘on a temporary basis. For you in particular, compliance with the SGE time limit is critical, given the scale of your conflicts of interest.” The group noted that Sacks’ private salary from Craft Ventures is permissible only under the temporary provisions of his appointment. If he has worked past the legal limit, the lawmakers warned, his continued dual roles could represent a breach of ethics. Counting the days According to the letter, Sacks was appointed in December 2024 and began working around Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20, 2025. By the lawmakers’ calculation, he reached the 130-day threshold in…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 07:37
Exclusive interview with Smokey The Bera, co-founder of Berachain: How the innovative PoL public chain solves the liquidity problem and may be launched in a few months

Exclusive interview with Smokey The Bera, co-founder of Berachain: How the innovative PoL public chain solves the liquidity problem and may be launched in a few months

Recently, PANews interviewed Smokey The Bera, co-founder of Berachain, to unravel the background of the establishment of this anonymous project, Berachain's PoL mechanism, the latest developments, and answered widely concerned topics such as airdrop expectations and new opportunities in the DeFi field.
Share
PANews2024/07/03 13:00