The post A commodity without a market: the hazelnut shock appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. I’m convinced that Nutella is the second most important inventionThe post A commodity without a market: the hazelnut shock appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. I’m convinced that Nutella is the second most important invention

A commodity without a market: the hazelnut shock

I’m convinced that Nutella is the second most important invention after the wheel. So yes, I’m an unapologetic hazelnut fan.

That said, a few months ago I started to notice something odd. The price of natural hazelnuts had more or less doubled. Shortly after, they became surprisingly hard to find, at least in supermarkets where they had always been readily available.

That caught my attention. And it made me wonder whether something unusual had happened, or was still unfolding, in the hazelnut market.

Hazelnuts: a commodity shock without a market

Hazelnuts are a small commodity with an unusually concentrated supply chain. Around 70% of global production comes from Turkey, with output overwhelmingly concentrated in the Black Sea region, where soil, rainfall and climate conditions are uniquely well suited to hazelnut trees. Few agricultural commodities display such geographic dependence.

That concentration extends beyond geography into labour. Roughly 600,000 farmers grow hazelnuts in Turkey, mostly on small, family-owned plots. Including processing, logistics and trade, an estimated five million people are directly or indirectly involved in the hazelnut economy. Production is fragmented, local and labour-intensive, a structure that shapes how the market functions in times of stress.

An opaque market by design

Hazelnuts do not trade on any major agricultural exchange. There are no futures contracts, no central clearing, and no benchmark price. Transactions are negotiated directly, often verbally, between farmers, wholesalers and exporters. Prices are quite literally “called on the phone”.

This makes the market largely inaccessible to non-commercial participants and almost invisible from a traditional commodity-market perspective. Yet physical supply and demand still clear, and when supply is disrupted, prices can move violently.

A rare but severe supply shock

In April 2025, hazelnut growers along Turkey’s Black Sea coast woke up to the worst possible surprise: a late frost sweeping through the region. Frosts like this are rare, maybe once a decade, but this one landed at exactly the wrong moment.

The spring had been unusually warm, pushing hazelnut trees to bud and flower earlier than normal. When temperatures suddenly dropped, the trees were completely exposed. The damage was immediate and widespread. Early estimates suggest around one-third of Turkey’s hazelnut crop was wiped out in a matter of days.

And the frost was only part of the story. Turkish growers had already been dealing with mounting pressures. The brown marmorated stink bug, which arrived in the country around 2017, has become a persistent threat, capable of destroying 10–20% of output in bad years. On top of that, the summer of 2024 was the hottest and driest in more than 60 years, leaving trees stressed and less resilient going into the 2025 season.

By the time the frost hit, the crop had little margin for error, and the market has been paying the price ever since.

Taken together, the result is a severe imbalance: available supply in 2025 is likely to meet only about half of global demand.

How prices behave without a benchmark

History provides a guide to what happens next. Following similar frost events in 2004 and 2014, hazelnut prices more than tripled. In the 2014 episode, prices began rising immediately after the frost in March, peaked in late April to early May 2015, and then fell by roughly 50% within one to two months as demand adjusted and inventories were released.

Hazelnut prices after major frost events (stylised, pre-frost = 100) (Prices are indicative and based on historical patterns rather than exchange-traded data)

Chart 1 illustrates this typical pattern by using a stylised price index. The spike is sharp, front-loaded and driven by physical scarcity rather than speculative positioning. The subsequent correction reflects demand rationing rather than a recovery in supply.

A problem with the structure of the supply

When the price of hazelnuts goes up, supply doesn’t rush in to meet it. There is no easy answer. It takes years for hazelnut trees to grow up, you can’t plant new orchards overnight, and there aren’t many other countries that can grow them. Most of the production still comes from small, family-run farms that don’t have much access to capital and can’t grow even when prices are high.

Because of this rigidity, shocks in the hazelnut market tend to look awful. The market doesn’t make small changes; instead, it swings suddenly: prices go up, volumes go down, and buyers have to adapt on the fly.

Hazelnuts: estimated 2025 supply vs demand (illustrative index)

Chart 2 captures the core of the current problem: demand remains broadly intact, but supply has been structurally impaired.

A market that matters, even though it’s hard to see

Hazelnuts may not be in the world of futures contracts and electronic trading screens, but they are an important part of the global food supply chain. There is steady demand for spreads, chocolates, biscuits, and baked goods, and it will be hard to find something else to fill the gap in the short term.

Combine that demand with a highly concentrated production base, rising climate volatility and biological risks, and the result is a market that is unusually fragile. When something goes wrong, there are few buffers, and the adjustment is sudden, not smooth.

The lesson from 2025 is not just about hazelnuts. It is about how physical commodities behave when there is no buffer of inventories, no financial market to absorb shocks, and no rapid supply response. In such markets, scarcity does not emerge gradually; it arrives all at once.

Source: https://www.fxstreet.com/news/are-you-hazel-nuts-202602011312

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Where is the Bottom for Bitcoin?

Where is the Bottom for Bitcoin?

Bitcoin is poised to mark its third week of consistent decline, slipping to one of its lowest levels in the last two years. It is no longer a question of whether
Share
Coinstats2026/02/09 03:22
Mysterious whales are accumulating these cryptocurrencies after market crash

Mysterious whales are accumulating these cryptocurrencies after market crash

The post Mysterious whales are accumulating these cryptocurrencies after market crash appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In a week where the cryptocurrency market
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/09 02:53
HOT MOMENTS: FOMC Statement Released Following the Fed Interest Rate Decision – Here Are All the Details of the Full Text

HOT MOMENTS: FOMC Statement Released Following the Fed Interest Rate Decision – Here Are All the Details of the Full Text

The post HOT MOMENTS: FOMC Statement Released Following the Fed Interest Rate Decision – Here Are All the Details of the Full Text appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The Fed has resumed interest rate cuts after a nine-month hiatus, lowering the federal funds rate by 25 basis points to a range of 4% to 4.25%. According to the “dot plot” projection reflected in the decision text, two additional interest rate cuts are envisaged in 2025. While 9 out of 19 officials expected two more interest rate cuts this year, 2 predicted a single cut, and 6 predicted no additional cuts. Newly appointed Fed Board member Stephen I. Miran dissented from the decision, voting for a stronger 50 basis point cut. The decision noted that economic growth slowed in the first half of the year, employment growth slowed, and the unemployment rate rose slightly. It also noted that inflation had begun to rise but remained high. While reiterating that it maintains its long-term targets of maximum employment and 2% inflation, the Fed noted that uncertainties regarding the economic outlook remain high. The statement read, “The Committee assesses that downside risks to employment have increased, in line with the balance of risks.” The statement stated that interest rate policy will be reshaped in the coming period, taking into account future data, the economic outlook, and the balance of risks. It also noted that the reduction in holdings of Treasury bonds, corporate debt instruments, and mortgage-backed securities will continue. The resolution was supported by Fed Chair Jerome Powell, Vice Chair John C. Williams, and board members Michael S. Barr, Michelle W. Bowman, Susan M. Collins, Lisa D. Cook, Austan D. Goolsbee, Philip N. Jefferson, Alberto G. Musalem, Jeffrey R. Schmid, and Christopher J. Waller. *This is not investment advice. Follow our Telegram and Twitter account now for exclusive news, analytics and on-chain data! Source: https://en.bitcoinsistemi.com/hot-moments-fomc-statement-released-following-the-fed-interest-rate-decision-here-are-all-the-details-of-the-full-text/
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:18