Author: Miscellaneous Talks on Seeing the Big Picture from Small Details I was recently pressured into buying some minor metal stocks, and looking back, I have Author: Miscellaneous Talks on Seeing the Big Picture from Small Details I was recently pressured into buying some minor metal stocks, and looking back, I have

Supply determines survival: The global landscape of tin, antimony, tungsten, and molybdenum, and China's central role.

2026/01/26 19:00
13 min read

Author: Miscellaneous Talks on Seeing the Big Picture from Small Details

I was recently pressured into buying some minor metal stocks, and looking back, I have to say they were surprisingly good. We can't afford to get trapped before we start researching; we need to do our research before we get trapped. So, I'm starting a new series: metal and mineral research, to examine the market dynamics of various minor metals.

Sometimes I find short essays quite interesting. For example, a few days ago it was mentioned that the import of explosives in Wa State, Myanmar, increased, and then tin prices immediately dropped. This suggests a potential supply logic.

[Reminder: Fundamentals are just fundamentals; they should not be used to guide trading.]

The so-called minor metals are not necessarily minor, especially in the context of industrial transformation. Once there is a technological breakthrough, minor metals may very well become strategic metals.

For example, before becoming an "energy metal," lithium's market size was not large, and it was mainly used in glass ceramics, lubricating greases, and other fields. However, with the explosive growth of new energy vehicles and energy storage industries, lithium, as a core raw material for power batteries, has seen its demand and market size expand dramatically, fundamentally changing its status.

Magnesium is a relatively clear potential minor metal to be listed as a futures commodity. Currently, the global magnesium market size is around one million tons, mainly used in aluminum alloy additives, die castings, and other fields. In the future, if magnesium undergoes significant changes in lightweight materials (such as automobiles and aerospace) or batteries, leading to an order-of-magnitude increase in its production and consumption, it is entirely possible that it could be upgraded to a base metal or an independent category.

I have a vivid memory of a passage from the previous dialogue between Huaxia and Everbright Qiu regarding the market situation:

"Strategic minor metals, such as rare earths, tungsten, molybdenum, cobalt, nickel, and tin, will continue to be revalued in the future. The core logic is the global competitive landscape. Even if the Sino-US competition slows down in stages, the competitive attributes of strategic metals will only intensify in the long run. These metals must meet two conditions: either they must be highly scarce or their supply chains must be concentrated."

For example, the Democratic Republic of Congo is a major supplier of cobalt, and it uses cobalt supply as a key bargaining chip, making its pricing heavily influenced by political factors. Similarly, Indonesian nickel and tin are highly dependent on Indonesia globally, and their scarcity makes them likely to become core commodities in the next round of bargaining. These commodities are either currently at their bottom or their value has not yet been fully realized, offering significant potential for future revaluation.

The strong performance of non-ferrous metals this year, apart from macroeconomic factors related to funding, is largely due to the significant challenges posed to global supply chain security (especially the security of resource and mineral resources).

As early as 2016, China clearly defined its strategic mineral resource layout through top-level design: the State Council issued the "National Mineral Resources Plan (2016-2020)," which, with the core principle of "ensuring national economic security, national defense security, and the development needs of strategic emerging industries," officially included 24 minerals, including chromium, aluminum, nickel, tungsten, tin, antimony, cobalt, lithium, rare earth, zirconium, crystalline graphite, petroleum, natural gas, shale gas, coal, coalbed methane, uranium, gold, iron, molybdenum, copper, phosphorus, potash, and fluorite, in the list of strategic mineral resources. These include many core strategic metals, laying a solid foundation for resource security for the high-quality development of related industries.

China possesses both resource endowment and production capacity advantages in four mineral sectors: tungsten, antimony, tin, and molybdenum. These four minerals are China's four strategically advantageous minerals. Below is an examination of the supply of these four minerals.

I. Types of Tin Minerals on the Supply Side

The primary source of tin supply is cassiterite (SnO₂, tin oxide), the main form of tin found in nature, accounting for over 95% of global tin resources. Smaller quantities of sulfide ores such as stannite (Cu₂FeSnS₄) also exist, but their economic value is relatively low. Cassiterite is beneficiated to obtain tin concentrate, which is then refined into tin through pyrometallurgical or hydrometallurgical processes.

Data for 2025 has not yet been fully released, but due to the continued shutdown of Wa State, Myanmar's output is expected to further decline to below 20,000 tons, accounting for about 7% of the total. The top five producing countries account for 69% of the total, and the top eight countries account for 85%, indicating a highly concentrated supply.

The Wa State of Myanmar has a significant impact on the tin industry chain, primarily because:

1) Historically large supply volume: Before the production stoppage in August 2023, Myanmar's normal annual output was about 50,000-60,000 tons (accounting for 15-20% of the global total), of which Wa State accounted for more than 90% of Myanmar's total output, that is, an annual supply of about 45,000-54,000 tons. This volume is equivalent to 1/6 of the global supply, and the sudden production stoppage created a huge gap.

2) Crucial for China's tin exports: China is the world's largest producer of refined tin (accounting for 45% of global production), but its domestic mine resources are depleted, making it heavily reliant on imports. Myanmar was once China's largest source of tin ore imports, with approximately 36,000 metric tons of tin concentrate imported from Myanmar in 2022, accounting for 60-70% of China's total imports. The shutdown of tin production in Wa State directly led to a shortage of tin for Chinese smelters.

3) High uncertainty regarding resumption of production: Although Wa State began the resumption process in 2025, the actual progress was far below expectations due to multiple factors such as policy, equipment, and the rainy season. By the end of 2025, the average monthly export volume was only 2,000-3,000 physical tons (approximately 1,000-1,500 metal tons), far below the average monthly metal tons before the shutdown.

4) Amplifying the global supply-demand imbalance: The global tin market has long been in a state of tight supply and demand balance (reserve-to-purchase ratio of only 15 years), and any small fluctuations in any major supplying country will be amplified by the market. Wa State's "shutdown-slow resumption of production" process became the core driving factor for the continued rise in tin prices in 2024-2025.

Tin ore is rarely found alone; it is often found in association with various metallic and non-metallic minerals.

Deposits associated with intermediate-acidic granites: This is the most important type of tin deposit. In skarn-type deposits (such as the Shizhuyuan deposit in Hunan) and cassiterite-sulfide-type deposits (such as the Gejiu deposit in Yunnan and the Dachang deposit in Guangxi), tin is often closely associated with tungsten, molybdenum, bismuth, copper, lead, zinc, silver, etc., forming large-scale polymetallic fields. In pegmatite-type deposits, tin tends to be associated with rare elements such as niobium, tantalum, lithium, beryllium, rubidium, cesium, etc.

Placer tin deposits are formed from primary tin ore through weathering, transportation, and enrichment. In addition to cassiterite, placer deposits often contain a variety of heavy minerals such as native gold, wolframite, monazite, rutile, and xenotime, making their comprehensive utilization value quite considerable.

II. Types of Antimony Minerals on the Supply Side

The primary source of antimony is stibnite (Sb₂S₃, antimony sulfide), the most abundant natural antimony ore, accounting for over 80% of global antimony resources. Small amounts of secondary minerals such as antimony oxide (Sb₂O₃) also exist. Stibnite is beneficiated to obtain antimony concentrate, which is then smelted using pyrometallurgical or hydrometallurgical processes to produce metallic antimony or antimony compounds.

The top three producing countries (China, Tajikistan, and Russia) account for 86.6% of the total, indicating a highly concentrated supply. Although China accounts for more than half of the production, this is a significant decrease from 90% in 2010, mainly due to stricter environmental policies and resource depletion.

Associated formations of antimony ore:

Mainly found in low- to medium-temperature hydrothermal environments: The vast majority of economically valuable antimony deposits are formed under low- to medium-temperature hydrothermal conditions. In this environment, stibnite often precipitates together with minerals such as cinnabar (mercury), pyrite, and quartz, forming typical low-temperature hydrothermal deposits.

Different types of characteristic combinations: 1) In the famous Xikuangshan antimony mine in Hunan, stibnite is associated with pyrite, orpiment, realgar, cinnabar, calcite, quartz and other minerals; 2) When antimony mineralization is superimposed with gold or tungsten mineralization, it will form a more valuable complex deposit such as antimony-gold-tungsten.

III. Types of Tungsten Minerals on the Supply Side

The main sources of tungsten supply are scheelite (CaWO₄, calcium tungstate) and wolframite ((Fe,Mn)WO₄, ferromanganese tungstate), which are the two main natural ore forms of tungsten. Scheelite accounts for over 70% of global tungsten resources, while wolframite accounts for about 25-30%. Scheelite is mostly found in skarn-type deposits, while wolframite is mostly found in high-temperature hydrothermal quartz vein-type deposits. Both are beneficiated to obtain tungsten concentrate (WO₃ content ≥ 65%), which is then smelted using pyrometallurgical or hydrometallurgical processes to produce ammonium paratungstate (APT), tungsten oxide, or metallic tungsten.

Tungsten market supply structure:

1) China dominates supply, but growth is sluggish: China is not only the largest tungsten producer (accounting for 83% of the global total) but also possesses approximately 52% of the world's tungsten reserves. However, domestic tungsten mining is subject to strict total quantity control targets. Although the mining target for 2024 was set at 114,000 tons, the actual output was 127,000 tons, indicating that over-extraction has been effectively controlled. Meanwhile, long-term mining has led to the depletion of high-grade ore, resulting in a continuous decline in the grade of raw ore, thus constraining supply growth from the source.

2) Limited new overseas supply: In 2024, global tungsten production outside of China was approximately 14,000 metric tons of metal, with diverse sources. Significant new supply mainly came from projects such as the Bakuta tungsten mine in Kazakhstan, but this accounted for a small proportion of global supply and is unlikely to change the supply pattern dominated by China in the short term.

3) Recycled tungsten is an important supplement: In addition to raw ore, recycled waste tungsten (such as scrap cemented carbide) is also an important source of supply. Currently, about 35% of the global tungsten supply comes from recycled materials, but China's recycling rate and product quality still lag behind international advanced levels.

Associated formations of tungsten ore:

Quartz vein type and greisen type deposits: These deposits are usually associated with granite intrusions. They are rich in associated minerals, including cassiterite, molybdenite, bismuthite, beryl, topaz, and tourmaline, in addition to wolframite. They are mostly found in quartz veins in the top or nearby surrounding rocks of granite bodies.

Skarn-type deposits: These deposits form at the contact zone between intermediate-acidic intrusive rocks and carbonate rocks (such as limestone), and are dominated by scheelite. Their associated mineral assemblages differ from those of quartz vein types, often being closely associated with sulfides such as chalcopyrite, galena, and sphalerite, as well as molybdenite. The Shizhuyuan deposit in Chenzhou, Hunan Province, is a world-class example of this type, and is also rich in various resources including tungsten, tin, molybdenum, bismuth, beryllium, and fluorite.

IV. Types of Molybdenum Minerals on the Supply Side

The primary source of molybdenum is molybdenite (MoS₂, molybdenum disulfide), the most important and economically valuable molybdenum ore in nature. Molybdenite is often found in porphyry deposits alongside metals such as copper and tungsten. After beneficiation, the ore yields molybdenum concentrate (typically requiring a MoS₂ content ≥85%), which is then roasted or hydrometallurgically smelted to produce molybdenum oxide (industrial molybdenum oxide), ferromolybdenum, or ammonium molybdate, among other products, which are subsequently used in steel alloys and chemical industries.

The five largest producing countries (China, Peru, Chile, the United States, and Mexico) account for 91.9% of the total, indicating a highly concentrated supply. In 2024, global molybdenum reserves were approximately 15 million tons, with China holding 5.9 million tons (39.3%), resulting in a reserve-to-production ratio of approximately 57 years.

China holds a triple position in the molybdenum market: resources, production, and consumption.

1) Resource endowment advantage: China's molybdenum reserves account for nearly 40% of the global total (5.9 million tons in 2024), and are mainly primary molybdenum mines with large deposit scale and relatively high grade (such as the Luanchuan molybdenum mine with an average grade of about 0.1%), making its resource endowment superior to most countries.

2) Absolute dominance in production: China accounts for more than 42% of global molybdenum production and has maintained its position as the world's largest producer for many consecutive years. Unlike metals such as tin and antimony, China's molybdenum industry does not rely on imports, with a raw material self-sufficiency rate of over 90%. This is different from the tin market, where China relies on imports from Myanmar.

3) Complete industrial chain: China has a complete industrial chain from mining and beneficiation to smelting and deep processing (ferromolybdenum, molybdenum powder, molybdenum chemicals), and leading companies such as Luoyang Molybdenum and Jinduicheng Molybdenum have global competitiveness.

4) Consumer Market Center: China is also the world's largest consumer of molybdenum (consumption of about 130,000 tons in 2024, accounting for more than 45% of the global total), mainly used in steel alloys (accounting for more than 70% of consumption), forming a closed-loop system of self-production and self-sales.

5) A large portion of global molybdenum is a byproduct of copper mining: ore grades in many large porphyry copper mines are declining. Several major copper mines may reach the end of their mining life by the mid-2030s, which will constrain future molybdenum supply growth.

Associated formations of molybdenum ore:

Porphyry molybdenum/porphyry copper deposits: These are the most important types of molybdenum deposits in the world. In porphyry copper deposits (such as the Dexing Copper Mine), molybdenum (molybdenite) is closely associated with copper sulfides as a byproduct. In porphyry molybdenum deposits (such as Luanchuan in Henan and Jinduicheng in Shaanxi), molybdenum is the main product, but it is often accompanied by elements such as tungsten and rhenium.

Skarn-type deposits: These deposits form at the contact zone between intermediate-acidic intrusive rocks and carbonate rocks. Here, molybdenite is often closely associated with scheelite, forming a molybdenum-tungsten assemblage (such as the Shizhuyuan deposit in Hunan), and various metal sulfides may also be present.

Quartz vein type and greisen type deposits: These deposits are usually associated with granite. In wolframite-quartz veins, molybdenite is often associated with them, and bismuthite, arsenopyrite and other minerals may also be present.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies

The post U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The United States is contending with the intricacies of cryptocurrency regulation as newly enacted legislation stirs debate over centralized versus decentralized finance. The recent passage of the GENIUS Act under Bo Hines’ leadership is perceived to skew favor towards centralized entities, potentially disadvantaging decentralized innovations. Continue Reading:U.S. Moves Grip on Crypto Regulation Intensifies Source: https://en.bitcoinhaber.net/u-s-moves-grip-on-crypto-regulation-intensifies
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:09
The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems

The gaming industry is in the midst of a historic shift, driven by the rise of Web3. Unlike traditional games, where developers and publishers control assets and dictate in-game economies, Web3 gaming empowers players with ownership and influence. Built on blockchain technology, these ecosystems are decentralized by design, enabling true digital asset ownership, transparent economies, and a future where players help shape the games they play. However, as Web3 gaming grows, security becomes a focal point. The range of security concerns, from hacking to asset theft to vulnerabilities in smart contracts, is a significant issue that will undermine or erode trust in this ecosystem, limiting or stopping adoption. Blockchain technology could be used to create security processes around secure, transparent, and fair Web3 gaming ecosystems. We will explore how security is increasing within gaming ecosystems, which challenges are being overcome, and what the future of security looks like. Why is Security Important in Web3 Gaming? Web3 gaming differs from traditional gaming in that players engage with both the game and assets with real value attached. Players own in-game assets that exist as tokens or NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens), and can trade and sell them. These game assets usually represent significant financial value, meaning security failure could represent real monetary loss. In essence, without security, the promises of owning “something” in Web3, decentralized economies within games, and all that comes with the term “fair” gameplay can easily be eroded by fraud, hacking, and exploitation. This is precisely why the uniqueness of blockchain should be emphasized in securing Web3 gaming. How Blockchain Ensures Security in Web3 Gaming?
  1. Immutable Ownership of Assets Blockchain records can be manipulated by anyone. If a player owns a sword, skin, or plot of land as an NFT, it is verifiably in their ownership, and it cannot be altered or deleted by the developer or even hacked. This has created a proven track record of ownership, providing control back to the players, unlike any centralised gaming platform where assets can be revoked.
  2. Decentralized Infrastructure Blockchain networks also have a distributed architecture where game data is stored in a worldwide network of nodes, making them much less susceptible to centralised points of failure and attacks. This decentralised approach makes it exponentially more difficult to hijack systems or even shut off the game’s economy.
  3. Secure Transactions with Cryptography Whether a player buys an NFT or trades their in-game tokens for other items or tokens, the transactions are enforced by cryptographic algorithms, ensuring secure, verifiable, and irreversible transactions and eliminating the risks of double-spending or fraudulent trades.
  4. Smart Contract Automation Smart contracts automate the enforcement of game rules and players’ economic exchanges for the developer, eliminating the need for intermediaries or middlemen, and trust for the developer. For example, if a player completes a quest that promises a reward, the smart contract will execute and distribute what was promised.
  5. Anti-Cheating and Fair Gameplay The naturally transparent nature of blockchain makes it extremely simple for anyone to examine a specific instance of gameplay and verify the economic outcomes from that play. Furthermore, multi-player games that enforce smart contracts on things like loot sharing or win sharing can automate and measure trustlessness and avoid cheating, manipulations, and fraud by developers.
  6. Cross-Platform Security Many Web3 games feature asset interoperability across platforms. This interoperability is made viable by blockchain, which guarantees ownership is maintained whenever assets transition from one game or marketplace to another, thereby offering protection to players who rely on transfers for security against fraud. Key Security Dangers in Web3 Gaming Although blockchain provides sound first principles of security, the Web3 gaming ecosystem is susceptible to threats. Some of the most serious threats include:
Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Smart contracts that are poorly written or lack auditing will leave openings for exploitation and thereby result in asset loss. Phishing Attacks: Unintentionally exposing or revealing private keys or signing transactions that are not possible to reverse, under the assumption they were genuine transaction requests. Bridge Hacks: Cross-chain bridges, which allow players to move their assets between their respective blockchains, continually face hacks, requiring vigilance from players and developers. Scams and Rug Pulls: Rug pulls occur when a game project raises money and leaves, leaving player assets worthless. Regulatory Ambiguity: Global regulations remain unclear; risks exist for players and developers alike. While blockchain alone won’t resolve every issue, it remediates the responsibility of the first principles, more so when joined by processes such as auditing, education, and the right governance, which can improve their contribution to the security landscapes in game ecosystems. Real Life Examples of Blockchain Security in Web3 Gaming Axie Infinity (Ronin Hack): The Axie Infinity game and several projects suffered one of the biggest hacks thus far on its Ronin bridge; however, it demonstrated the effectiveness of multi-sig security and the effective utilization of decentralization. The industry benefited through learning and reflection, thus, as projects have implemented changes to reduce the risks of future hacks or misappropriation. Immutable X: This Ethereum scaling solution aims to ensure secure NFT transactions for gaming, allowing players to trade an asset without the burden of exorbitant fees and fears of being a victim of fraud. Enjin: Enjin is providing a trusted infrastructure for Web3 games, offering secure NFT creation and transfer while reiterating that ownership and an asset securely belong to the player. These examples indubitably illustrate that despite challenges to overcome, blockchain remains the foundational layer on which to build more secure Web3 gaming environments. Benefits of Blockchain Security for Players and Developers For Players: Confidence in true ownership of assets Transparency in in-game economies Protection against nefarious trades/scams For Developers: More trust between players and the platform Less reliance on centralized infrastructure Ability to attract wealth and players based on provable fairness By incorporating blockchain security within the mechanics of game design, developers can create and enforce resilient ecosystems where players feel reassured in investing time, money, and ownership within virtual worlds. The Future of Secure Web3 Gaming Ecosystems As the wisdom of blockchain technology and industry knowledge improves, the future for secure Web3 gaming looks bright. New growing trends include: Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs): A new wave of protocols that enable private transactions and secure smart contracts while managing user privacy with an element of transparency. Decentralized Identity Solutions (DID): Helping players control their identities and decrease account theft risks. AI-Enhanced Security: Identifying irregularities in user interactions by sampling pattern anomalies to avert hacks and fraud by time-stamping critical events. Interoperable Security Standards: Allowing secured and seamless asset transfers across blockchains and games. With these innovations, blockchain will not only secure gaming assets but also enhance the overall trust and longevity of Web3 gaming ecosystems. Conclusion Blockchain is more than a buzzword in Web3; it is the only way to host security, fairness, and transparency. With blockchain, players confirm immutable ownership of digital assets, there is a decentralized infrastructure, and finally, it supports smart contracts to automate code that protects players and developers from the challenges of digital economies. The threats, vulnerabilities, and scams that come from smart contracts still persist, but the industry is maturing with better security practices, cross-chain solutions, and increased formal cryptographic tools. In the coming years, blockchain will remain the base to digital economies and drive Web3 gaming environments that allow players to safely own, trade, and enjoy their digital experiences free from fraud and exploitation. While blockchain and gaming alone entertain, we will usher in an era of secure digital worlds where trust complements innovation. The Role of Blockchain in Building Safer Web3 Gaming Ecosystems was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Share
Medium2025/09/18 14:40
Why your phone number shows as private and how to remove it

Why your phone number shows as private and how to remove it

Table of contents How to remove private number on your Android How to remove private number on your iPhone (iOS) What to do if your number still shows as Private
Share
Techcabal2026/02/07 00:23