Terms such as “Web3”, “decentralised”, “NFT”, and “blockchain” are no longer limited to somewhat technical circles alone, and they certainly have not been lost Terms such as “Web3”, “decentralised”, “NFT”, and “blockchain” are no longer limited to somewhat technical circles alone, and they certainly have not been lost

Maxwell James Sterling Wants to Bring Blockchain and Transparency to Betting

2026/01/23 17:53
5 min read

Terms such as “Web3”, “decentralised”, “NFT”, and “blockchain” are no longer limited to somewhat technical circles alone, and they certainly have not been lost on the budding cryptocurrency investor. However, might they also soon have a place in sports betting? According to the well-known opinions of Maxwell James Sterling, this is already a foregone conclusion. We recently had an opportunity to spend a few moments discussing the potential future role of cryptocurrencies in relation to online bookmaking, and he provided us with a surprising level of insight.

More than a Sports Journalist

If there is anyone qualified to discuss blockchain-based trends, Maxwell James Sterling is close to the top of the list. While be boasts a strong background in sports journalism, his familiarity with other concepts such as statistical analysis and probability theory are just as impressive. This is why looking ahead is not a matter of intuition. It rather involves reading the current state of affairs, and extrapolating valid conclusions.

“Let’s keep in mind that cryptocurrencies are no longer solely limited to trading circles,” he begins. “Tokens such as Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Ethereum have begun to provide real-world solutions when it comes to online transactions. So, it only stands to reason that they are beginning to appeal to average wagering enthusiasts.”

The Next Generation of Online Payments

We wanted to know why cryptocurrencies appeal throughout the online betting (and indeed the larger iGaming) community. Maxwell James Sterling provided a handful of benefits that are not often associated with traditional fiat payments:

  • Cryptocurrencies are relatively immune to the effects of inflation.
  • The transactions themselves are normally completed within a matter of seconds.
  • Crypto-based platforms offer superior level of privacy and discretion.

He particularly emphasises the final point.

“One of the most predominant trends I’ve noticed throughout my X feed involves the notion of online privacy. Individuals are constantly looking for additional means to keep ‘big brother’ at bay, and cryptocurrencies can often present the ideal solution.”

However, he also mentions that these tokens are much more user-friendly when compared to a handful of years ago. Assuming that one already possesses a cryptocurrency wallet, the mechanics themselves are quite similar to fiat alternatives.

How Have Bookmakers Responded?

Bookmakers realise that loyalty is the most valuable commodity at their disposal. So, they are quite eager to keep members happy. Providing them with more flexible payment solutions is an obvious choice from the perspective of pragmatism alone. However, some have been quicker to adopt cryptocurrencies than others. Are there any reasons for sluggish response times?

“One of the issues that I’ve seen come to pass involves traditionalists who are put in a position of management. They are wary about making changes to their payment ecosystems. More often than not, this comes from a lack of understanding how cryptocurrencies actually work.”

He likewise believes that bookmakers who fail to adopt these so-called “hybrid” payment models are at risk of appearing generic, and even outdated.

“The bottom line is that cryptocurrencies represent the next major paradigm shift in terms of how online bets are placed. Although these options have only recently emerged, the associated momentum is already impossible to deny.”

The Need for Transparency

As also wanted to ask Maxwell James Sterling about the decentralised nature of the cryptocurrency community. Would this lead to an increased level of transparency, or might it instead cause confusion?

“I posed this very same question to my Instagram community in late 2024. Most responded that they were not overly concerned about payment transparency. In fact, the majority went as far to say that they would lean towards a fully anonymous payment provider if presented with the option.”

Still, Maxwell James Sterling maintains a balanced perspective. He also highlights that certain security features should still be employed by bookmakers, even those dealing with cryptocurrency accounts.

“Measures such as know-your-client verification are powerful tools that help to prevent serious threats including identity theft, and money laundering,” he asserts. “While these might not be the most convenient processes for the end user, they are excellent ways to provide a greater sense of transparency, and to illustrate that the bookmaker cares about the safety of its members.”

Farewell to Fiat?

Considering his background in statistics and probabilities, we thought that it would make sense to conclude with a final question. Will cryptocurrencies eventually replace fiat-based wagering methods?

“Not at all,” he confidently responds. “We need to remember that there are plenty of benefits associated with fiat transactions. Cryptocurrencies are instead meant to add another ‘string to the bow’ when it comes to convenience.”

He also states that younger betting enthusiasts are more likely to embrace these lightning-fast alternatives. However, we should not prepare to say goodbye to fiat any time soon.

The post Maxwell James Sterling Wants to Bring Blockchain and Transparency to Betting appeared first on Live Bitcoin News.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16