Barely a week after the NFT project announced its partnership with English football club Man City, the former UCL winner has been dragged into a social media uproarBarely a week after the NFT project announced its partnership with English football club Man City, the former UCL winner has been dragged into a social media uproar

Manchester City forced to intervene as Pudgy Penguins draws India backlash

Barely a week after the NFT project announced its partnership with English football club Man City, the former UCL winner has been dragged into a social media uproar against a racial statement. 

Pudgy Penguins posted a message on X last week commenting on the social platform’s efforts to curb reply spam and so-called “AI slop” Information Finance posts. The post insinuated that the crackdown might “actually have a significant effect on India’s economy,” which many users interpreted as stereotyping Indians as the largest community in InfoFi.

Manchester City contacted Pudgy Penguins after the post circulated, asking the NFT platform to apologize to a community member who called it out as xenophobic. The Premier League club entered a commercial partnership with the NFT project last Thursday.

Manchester City forces Pudgy Penguins to apologize for mocking India

Dan Sickles, director of the NFT documentary project New Here, said Pudgy Penguins was “trafficking in base, xenophobic, colonial humor,” owing to how its American marketing team runs similar engagement farming campaigns like InfoFi. 

“I’ve met their guy, he’s great at his job, and he’s not from Mumbai,” Sickles said, referring to the project’s social media manager.

The backlash first began when an X user and Offline protocol developer named Satvik reported the post to Manchester City. Satvik said he took it up with the club after other users attempted to minimize the issue and deemed it harmless.

“Everyone commented on his post that it’s not serious and it wasn’t racism, let’s let the partners decide for themselves. I’m fucking tired of how normalized racism against Indians has become on this platform. Every single day we endure hurtful comments for simply existing online,” he complained.

Satvik later shared an email response he received from Manchester City, which read: 

According to the programmer, Pudgy Penguins’ CEO Lucas Netz should be “incredibly ashamed” of his team for allowing the post to be published. As of the time of writing, neither Netz nor the company had issued a public apology on their own channels.

Satvik later quoted his original post and said he wanted clarity on how Pudgy Penguins intended to prevent another xenophobic statement from being made. He wanted to hear what company policies Netz will enact “to prevent incidents like this from happening again, and for him to condemn xenophobia and racism more generally.”

“I’d also love to hear why the post stayed up so long despite people sharing feedback immediately,” he continued.

PENGU token drops 3.7% in 24 hours

The price of Pudgy Penguins’ token, PENGU, jumped by 5% after the project announced its partnership with Manchester City on January 15. But the rally proved short-lived as traders began taking profits soon after the announcement. 

PENGU has since fallen below $0.01, a drop of about 16% and a weekly plunge of 20%, coinciding with the community backlash over its now-deleted X post. Moreover, market participants believe that factors like the fading of the speculative interest after the partnership news was fully absorbed caused a negative price correction on the token.

According to its press statement, the Manchester City partnership debuted a premium digital collectible and merchandise for the football club’s fans. Yet, some netizens noted that Pudgy Penguins’ social media presence clashes with its family-friendly branding. 

While the brand markets itself through child-oriented products, its online posts frequently lean into trending topics in finance and technology, sometimes using edgy or provocative language to drive engagement, much similar to what InfoFi influencers and projects do. 

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.

Market Opportunity
Manchester City Fan Logo
Manchester City Fan Price(CITY)
$0.6182
$0.6182$0.6182
-0.53%
USD
Manchester City Fan (CITY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37