The post UNI Technical Analysis Jan 20 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. UNI’s Volume Story: Participation Level Questions Conviction – Low-Volume Declines AccumulationThe post UNI Technical Analysis Jan 20 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. UNI’s Volume Story: Participation Level Questions Conviction – Low-Volume Declines Accumulation

UNI Technical Analysis Jan 20

UNI’s Volume Story: Participation Level Questions Conviction – Low-Volume Declines Accumulation or Trap?

Volume Profile and Market Participation

UNI’s last 24-hour volume came in at the 103.10 million dollar level, well below the recent 7-day average volume (approximately 180-220 million dollar range). While price shows a -1.50% decline at $4.92, this drying up in volume is noteworthy. Market participation is weak; even as the downtrend continues, selling pressure lacks volume support. According to volume profile analysis, volume nodes (POC – Point of Control) have formed in the $4.85-$5.45 range in recent weeks, but the current price is testing below these nodes. Low-volume sessions indicate retail-driven selling – big players may be sidelined. For a healthy downtrend, volume expansion is expected, but here it’s the opposite: volume decreases as price falls, signaling a lack of conviction. Comparatively, with price below EMA20 ($5.45), the value area low in the volume profile (around $4.62) forms strong support. Market participants are cautious; speculative selling dominates, with no institutional inflows yet. This suggests price cannot deepen further without volume – a classic ‘dry up’ volume pattern is observed.

Accumulation or Distribution?

Accumulation Signals

Accumulation signals are clear: Volume has steadily decreased in recent declines, indicating sellers are exhausting. RSI at 34.69 approaches oversold territory, with clear volume divergence – price makes new lows while volume is lower than previous lows. In MTF volume context, there are 3 strong support levels on 1D and 3D timeframes (especially $4.62 score 77/100), and 2 supports on the weekly. This could mark the lower boundary of an accumulation box; like a ‘spring’ test in Wyckoff methodology. If volume picks up at $4.62 (e.g., 150M+), absorption confirmation arrives. Over the last 3 days, volume slightly increased on upticks, and despite overall drying up, volume spikes were observed at supports – signaling smart money dip buying.

Distribution Risks

Distribution warnings are limited but present: Bearish MACD histogram and Supertrend resistance ($5.98) could block volume-less breakouts. If $4.62 breaks with volume exceeding 200M+, distribution acceleration risk increases. On the weekly timeframe, 3 resistances (no score >=60 but 3R in MTF), upper nodes recall selling pressure. No strong resistance identified, but a rally above EMA20 without volume would be unhealthy. For distribution, an ‘upthrust’ is needed – watch for fake breakouts.

Price-Volume Harmony

Price action lacks volume confirmation: -1.50% loss in downtrend but volume 50% below average – bearish move without conviction. Healthy declines require volume increase (distribution), healthy rallies need volume pickup on upmoves. Here, divergence: Price erodes below EMAs while volume dries up, creating bullish divergence. RSI low without volume confirmation means high oversold bounce potential. Confirmation at key levels (when $4.62 support is tested with volume). As you’ll see in UNI Spot Analysis, spot volume is lower than futures – low long squeeze risk. In futures (UNI Futures Analysis), leverage is low, volume does not dominate price.

Big Player Activity

Institutional activity is unclear but clues exist: On 1W timeframe, resistances (3R) resemble institutional selling, but 1D supports (2S) show large block trade spikes – likely whale accumulation. Volume profile high volume nodes (around $5.00) indicate trapped shorts. Institutional patterns: No climax selling, volume absorption on spring tests. Exact positions unknown, but inflow patterns in altcoins during dominance decline align with UNI. Supported by on-chain data (not here), exchange outflows would confirm accumulation.

Bitcoin Correlation

BTC at $91,231 -1.99% sideways, Supertrend bearish – caution for altcoins. UNI highly correlated with BTC (0.85+), if BTC $90,920 support breaks, UNI drops to $4.62, cascade risk at $88,225. If BTC resistances ($92,479-$94,151) are cleared, UNI bullish target $6.79. BTC dominance with bearish supertrend could open room for alts, but currently UNI BTC pair is down – if BTC stays stable, UNI bases. Key watch: BTC $90k hold for UNI relief rally.

Volume-Based Outlook

Volume-based outlook cautious bullish: Low-volume downtrend signals exhaustion, expect volume pickup at $4.62 support (150M+). Bearish target $3.075 low score (22), bullish $6.79 (30) could come with volume. Strategy: Long at $4.62, stop below; short resistance breakout without volume. Education: Volume leads price – here dry up says accumulation. Risk: BTC dump with volume spike distribution. Overall: Rangebound without participation increase, reversal if it rises.

This analysis uses Chief Analyst Devrim Cacal’s market views and methodology.

Trading Analyst: Emily Watson

Short-term trading strategies expert

This analysis is not investment advice. Do your own research.

Source: https://en.coinotag.com/analysis/uni-volume-analysis-january-20-2026-accumulation-or-distribution

Market Opportunity
4 Logo
4 Price(4)
$0.02133
$0.02133$0.02133
-3.26%
USD
4 (4) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37