XDC Network is targeting faster and cheaper Australia–U.S. business payments with its new AUDD–USDC liquidity pool, aiming to replace slow, high-fee banking railsXDC Network is targeting faster and cheaper Australia–U.S. business payments with its new AUDD–USDC liquidity pool, aiming to replace slow, high-fee banking rails

Interview with XDC Network’s Sean White: How XDC’s AUDD–USDC pool is reshaping cross-border trade settlement

Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.

XDC Network’s Sean White explains how the new AUDD–USDC pool is slashing Australia–U.S. settlement times from days to minutes.

Sean XDC network

Australian businesses face hurdles when transacting with their U.S counterparts. Banks charge high transaction fees, and it can take between 4-5 days to settle a transaction. In business, where every second counts, this can create unnecessary frustrations. To address these challenges, XDC Network has launched a new blockchain-based payments infrastructure for business transactions between Australia and the United States. We sat down with Sean White, BD and Ecosystem Manager at Australia XDC Network, to tell us more about how this infrastructure can disrupt traditional banking rails.

Q: Sean, XDC Network has just launched an AUDD–USDC liquidity pool on Curve Finance. Why does this matter now for businesses moving money between Australia and the US?

Sean White: Cross-border payments are at an inflection point. Businesses are no longer willing to accept three to 4-5 days for settlement and 3-7% in fees when the technology exists to do it in minutes. The AUDD–USDC pool gives Australian and US counterparties a direct, on-chain settlement path that’s faster, cheaper, and more transparent, while still meeting compliance expectations.

Q: In simple terms, how does XDC enable near-instant AUD–USD settlement compared to traditional banks?

Sean White: Traditional banking relies on multiple intermediaries and batch processing. On XDC, value moves directly on-chain. AUDD acts as a fully reserved digital representation of the Australian dollar, while USDC does the same for USD. The Curve pool provides deep liquidity between the two, allowing near-instant conversion with minimal slippage. Settlement happens at the blockchain layer, not across several correspondent banks, which is where the delay and cost normally come from.

Q: The IMF points to APAC as the global leader in digital currency adoption. What kind of response are you seeing from Australian businesses so far?

Sean White: There’s strong interest, particularly from exporters, payment providers, and trade finance platforms. While we’re still early post-launch, demand is being driven by settlement of trade invoices, treasury management, and cross-border supplier payments. 

Q: XDC’s US dollar infrastructure has reportedly processed over US$1 billion in transactions in the past 90 days. What advantages does this give over correspondent banking, and how do you address regulatory or security concerns?

Sean White: The biggest advantages are speed, cost, and predictability. With blockchain-based settlement, you remove hidden fees, time zone delays, and reconciliation issues. From a regulatory perspective, XDC is designed for institutional use — we’re ISO 20022–compliant and built to interoperate with existing financial messaging standards. Security is handled at both the protocol level and through enterprise-grade infrastructure used by participants, which makes this far more robust than many people assume.

Q: AUDD is already being used in live trade initiatives across Asia and the Middle East. How does expanding into the Australia–US corridor build on that momentum?

Sean White: It’s a natural extension. AUDD has proven itself as a settlement asset in Asia-focused trade corridors like Hong Kong, Singapore, and the UAE. The Australia–US corridor brings scale and global relevance. Once you connect these corridors through shared on-chain liquidity, you start to see the potential for a truly interconnected trade settlement network rather than isolated bilateral systems.

Q: SMEs often feel the pain of cross-border fees the most. What practical steps should Australian businesses take to start using this infrastructure?

Sean White: The first step is working with payment providers or platforms already building on XDC. We have seen many integrating this infrastructure directly into their offerings. From there, businesses can settle invoices, move treasury funds, or finance trade using stablecoins like AUDD without changing their core operations. Trust is critical, which is why XDC focuses on enterprise-grade security, compliance, and standards like ISO 20022 to make adoption as frictionless as possible.

Q: Finally, what does this launch say about XDC Network’s broader ambition in global trade and payments?

Sean White: It signals that we’re focused on real-world adoption, not theory. Stablecoins are increasingly becoming the default rails for cross-border payments, and XDC is positioning itself as the blockchain layer that regulated institutions and businesses can actually use. This is about modernising trade and payments infrastructure — starting in APAC, but with global reach.

Disclosure: This content is provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the author of this article endorses any product mentioned on this page. Users should conduct their own research before taking any action related to the company.

Market Opportunity
XDC Network Logo
XDC Network Price(XDC)
$0.04037
$0.04037$0.04037
-1.46%
USD
XDC Network (XDC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37