The post Canaan Delisting Risk Resurges After Nasdaq Min Bid Breach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Regulatory pressure is mounting again on Canaan as the The post Canaan Delisting Risk Resurges After Nasdaq Min Bid Breach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Regulatory pressure is mounting again on Canaan as the

Canaan Delisting Risk Resurges After Nasdaq Min Bid Breach

Regulatory pressure is mounting again on Canaan as the threat of canaan delisting has re-emerged following another warning from the Nasdaq exchange.

Second Nasdaq non-compliance notice in less than a year

Canaan Inc. faces renewed delisting risk after its shares traded below the Nasdaq minimum bid price requirement for the second time in less than a year. The Bitcoin mining hardware maker has seen its stock fall more than 63% over the past 12 months, underscoring persistent market weakness.

The company disclosed the latest setback in a statement last week, confirming receipt of a formal Nasdaq compliance notice timeline tied to Listing Rule 5550(a)(2). Under this rule, a listed company must maintain a closing bid price of at least $1.00 for 30 consecutive business days in order to remain in good standing.

Moreover, Canaan stressed that its American depositary shares will continue to trade on the Nasdaq Global Market during the current compliance period. It added that management plans to monitor the stock closely and take what it described as all reasonable measures to restore compliance with the Nasdaq minimum bid price rule.

Key deadlines and conditions for regaining compliance

Nasdaq has granted Canaan a standard 180-day grace period, giving the company until July 13, 2026, to remedy the deficiency. During this window, the share price must close at or above $1 for at least 10 consecutive trading days, a level last seen before it slipped under the threshold on Nov. 28.

If Canaan fails to meet this requirement by July 13, 2026, the exchange may offer an additional 180-day extension, subject to specific conditions. However, that extra time would likely come with heightened scrutiny of the company’s capital structure, liquidity profile, and realistic prospects for sustained price recovery.

As part of this process, the firm signaled that it could consider a reverse stock split option if necessary to lift the per-share price. That mechanism reduces the total number of outstanding shares, theoretically pushing up the price of each remaining share without changing the company’s overall market capitalization.

Possible delisting process and Nasdaq review

Canaan emphasized that Nasdaq staff will review its plan and decide whether the company can reasonably be expected to cure the deficiency. That said, if exchange officials determine that Canaan is unlikely to regain compliance, or if the company chooses not to pursue a transfer application or make the required representations, Nasdaq may move toward delisting.

In that scenario, the exchange would issue a formal notice stating that the company’s securities are subject to being removed from the Nasdaq Global Market. However, such a step would typically follow an appeals process and potential hearings, giving Canaan another chance to outline corrective measures.

For now, Canaan shares remain weak. On Friday, the stock closed down more than 3.8% at $0.79, meaning it must climb roughly 27% to regain the key $1 threshold and re-enter the compliance range.

Share price history and previous warning

This is not the first time the company has fallen short of Nasdaq’s minimum bid requirement. Back in May, Canaan received a prior non-compliance warning over the same listing rule but subsequently managed to resolve the issue within the allotted timeframe.

Moreover, the earlier recovery was aided by a strong trading rally. Canaan’s stock price surged nearly 25% to reach a nine-month high of $2.05 in October after it announced its largest avalon a15 pro order in more than three years, signaling fresh demand for its mining equipment.

Despite that rebound, the canaan stock price decline resumed in the following months, erasing most of those gains. The renewed pressure underscores how vulnerable smaller crypto infrastructure players remain to market cycles, regulatory constraints, and shifting investor sentiment.

Sector headwinds weigh on Bitcoin miners

The latest compliance challenges arrive at a difficult time for the broader crypto mining industry. Bitcoin-mining companies such as Canaan have struggled since the most recent Bitcoin halving, which cut block rewards and compressed revenue streams across the sector.

At the same time, Bitcoin’s underwhelming price performance over the past few months has further squeezed cash flows. As a result, many operators have been forced to run on very thin or even negative profitability, reflecting mounting bitcoin miners margin pressure in a more competitive landscape.

Furthermore, Canaan is not the only crypto-linked business attracting closer attention from major exchanges. Last month, Kindly MD, which focuses on managing a Bitcoin treasury, received a similar Nasdaq warning after its shares traded below the minimum bid price requirement, highlighting how exchange rules continue to bite smaller digital-asset firms.

Outlook for Canaan and its investors

Looking ahead, investors will be watching both operational performance and market conditions to gauge whether Canaan can satisfy the current compliance deadlines and avoid another escalation in the canaan delisting process. Much will depend on Bitcoin’s price trajectory, demand for mining hardware, and the company’s capital management strategy.

If the firm succeeds in lifting its share price above $1 for the required period, it could stabilize its listing status and buy more time to execute its business plan. However, failure to do so by the key July 13, 2026, date could push Nasdaq to intensify its review and potentially move closer to a formal delisting decision.

In summary, Canaan remains under pressure from both market forces and exchange regulations, with the coming months likely to prove decisive for its listing future and for shareholders tracking the stock’s next move.

Source: https://en.cryptonomist.ch/2026/01/19/canaan-delisting-min-bid-breach/

Market Opportunity
CreatorBid Logo
CreatorBid Price(BID)
$0.01739
$0.01739$0.01739
-1.52%
USD
CreatorBid (BID) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37