Bitcoin (BTC) has been through a lot as it has gone through crash after crash while also being banned and receiving a lot of obituaries but still managed to surviveBitcoin (BTC) has been through a lot as it has gone through crash after crash while also being banned and receiving a lot of obituaries but still managed to survive

Bitcoin (BTC) Collapse Warning: 7–11 Year Security Time Bomb

Bitcoin (BTC) has been through a lot as it has gone through crash after crash while also being banned and receiving a lot of obituaries but still managed to survive.

However, a fresh caution has again caused a stir in the market. A well-known expert Justin Bons, the president of Cyber Capital and a researcher in crypto for a long time, thinks that BTC is walking on a very risky road. His statement is very sharp. He claims the presence of certain systemic security-related weaknesses might lead to the extinction of BTC within the next 7 to 11 years.

If there is one thing that can be said to summarize the whole argument, then that would be miner revenue. To be exact, Bitcoin miners are the ones who bring about and ensure the safety of the network. They receive their payments through a combination of block rewards and transaction fees.

However, this process is not as simple and straightforward as it sounds because there is a halving every four years which drastically reduces block rewards by half. Bons, therefore, predicts that this constant slipping will eventually lead to a crash.

BTC’s price, according to him, is not able to keep on doubling every cycle without the risk of going over the limit set by global GDP. In addition, transaction fees cannot be high indefinitely in the long run if the market remains competitive.

With a decrease in miner’s earnings, what Bons refers to as Bitcoin’s “security budget” also declines. If security is inexpensive, then it is easy for attackers to carry out their plans.

Also Read: Bitcoin & Ethereum Ignite First Major Crypto Rally of 2026

Bitcoin Security and Halving Trap

According to Bons, the risk will come up rather silently. Attacks will be possible as soon as miner revenue declines to a level that is low enough. He thinks this is likely to happen within the next two to three halving cycles. By then, the cost of an attack on Bitcoin could be as low as several million dollars. However, the possible profit might be in the range of hundreds of millions or even billions.

Bons cautions that this kind of imbalance will only encourage censorship, manipulation, and resulting panics. He goes on to say that it is not the raw hashrate only that secures Bitcoin; what does matter is the amount of money required to attack the network. Once the cost drops, the resistance disappears.

Bons throws in the towel and offers two very unappealing alternatives instead. One of them is to increase the rigid supply of Bitcoin from 21 million to even more in order to provide better incentives for miners. Another one is to keep the limit and receive ongoing assaults, so to speak, as a bargain.

Bitcoin Community Pushes Back Hard

This forecast has not at all been bought by the Bitcoin community. A lot of people claim that Bons is not so good at judging BTC’s adaptation. They mention creativity, multi-layered solutions, and changing fee markets as the protective measures he does not consider.

Bitcoiners importantly mention that security comes from different sources. In addition, they consider energy expenses, location of miners around the globe and the agreement in society as the main factors determining the security of the BTC network. The warning of Bons is regarded by some as a theoretical issue rather than a practical one.

Bitcoin has always had its share of detractors. At present, it is still there. Whether the timeline put forth by Bons turns out to be a prophetic or misguided will be determined solely by time, and the next few halvings.

Also Read: Ethereum-Bitcoin Retests Critical 8-Year Downtrend, Traders Watch for Breakout

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$89,420.55
$89,420.55$89,420.55
-1.38%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37