The post Korea drops Naver, NCSoft from ‘Sovereign AI’ contest appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Two prominent technology companies have been cut from South The post Korea drops Naver, NCSoft from ‘Sovereign AI’ contest appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Two prominent technology companies have been cut from South

Korea drops Naver, NCSoft from ‘Sovereign AI’ contest

Two prominent technology companies have been cut from South Korea’s government-backed effort to build an artificial intelligence system without depending on American or Chinese technology. The Ministry of Science and ICT revealed the decision today after completing initial reviews of the national program.

Naver Cloud and NCSoft are no longer in the race. The other three organizations that will progress are Upstage, SK Telecom, and LG AI Research.

The government organized this competition to create what officials call a “sovereign AI” basic paradigm. The goal is to develop technology that South Korea can handle on its own.

Scoring criteria for the evaluation process

The two government agencies in charge of the assessment process were the Telecommunications Technology Association and the National IT Industry Promotion Agency. The teams were assessed using three criteria.

40 points were awarded for benchmark testing. This section evaluated the AI systems’ ability to comprehend language, solve issues, and produce written material.

35 points came from expert reviews. Experts examined the models’ training and design processes as well as whether the technology was genuinely novel.

The final 25 points came from user comments. The reliability and practicality of the systems were assessed in this section.

LG AI Research won all three categories. Reviewers emphasized SK Telecom‘s reliable operations and strong infrastructure. Upstage was acknowledged for its technological efficiency despite its small size.

The government explained why Naver Cloud was taken down. Officials claimed that the company’s proposal did not meet the criteria that models be built “from scratch.”

Reviewers from outside the company discovered that Naver’s vision encoder, which handles photos and visual data, was nearly identical to one made by Alibaba’s Qwen system in China. More than 99% of the weights in the two models matched. Naver Cloud supported this strategy, claiming that it improved performance and assisted with worldwide compatibility.

However, the ministry determined that the competition’s goal of attaining technical independence was undermined by modifying or utilizing significant components from foreign models.

NC AI, the NCSoft team, likewise failed. The group did not receive enough points to advance to the following round. Specific scoring information for this squad was not disclosed by the ministry.

The path forward

Naver Cloud declared today that it will not contest the ministry’s decision. The business intends to continue supplying the project with GPU infrastructure. Outside of this government competition, it will also focus on developing its own AI technologies.

Four teams should remain in the competition, according to the government. To fill the vacancy, officials said they will conduct another round of selection in the first half of 2026. Businesses including Kakao, KT, and Konan Technology who were rejected in previous phases will get another opportunity to participate.

The government plans to pick two final winners by 2027. Those teams will receive major backing from the state. Support includes access to KRW 1.9 trillion worth of powerful computing equipment and large national datasets.

If you’re reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/korea-naver-ncsoft-ai-contest/

Market Opportunity
Cloud Logo
Cloud Price(CLOUD)
$0.06092
$0.06092$0.06092
-1.08%
USD
Cloud (CLOUD) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37