The post Chronicle successfully restores original Bitcoin protocol appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Business > Chronicle completes BSV’s missionThe post Chronicle successfully restores original Bitcoin protocol appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Homepage > News > Business > Chronicle completes BSV’s mission

Chronicle successfully restores original Bitcoin protocol

By now, it’s well-known (or should be) that BSV restored Satoshi Nakamoto’s original rules for Bitcoin in January 2020. The “Genesis” release of the protocol software removed most limits on transaction block sizes, along with poorly-implemented new rules added by various contributors. It also restored functionality that had been removed, but was required for Bitcoin to achieve global scale. In 2026, the SV Node development team will activate ”Chronicle”—an upgrade intended as the final major release of BSV blockchain’s SV Node software before Teranode eventually supersedes it.

BSV Association stated Chronicle will be “as close to the original (Bitcoin) protocol as possible,” restoring any remaining OPCODE functions that weren’t included with Genesis, and removing any leftover limitations on what data can be added to a transaction. They also collaborated with developers on specific projects running on the network, determining features that would enable maximum flexibility and creativity. 

The Chronicle upgrade will be mandatory for all full nodes (i.e., “miners”) using SV Node to process transactions, though its individual features will be “opt-in” for those who wish to make use of them. It’s scheduled to activate on the BSV Testnet at block height 1,713,168 (estimated at 12:00 p.m. on January 14, 2026), but won’t activate on the Mainnet until a few months later, around 12:00 p.m. on April 7, 2026 (block height 943,816).

Anyone can examine the Chronicle upgrade to the SV Node at GitHub. As well as its near-full restoration of Bitcoin’s original rules, it includes a return to the original Transaction Digest Algorithm (for Bitcoin Script users) and removes some restrictions on Transaction Malleability.

Why did Bitcoin need restoring?

Satoshi Nakamoto had always intended for Bitcoin to scale. The 1MB transaction block-size limit was intended as a temporary spam filter, not the almost-religious commitment to small blocks we still see on the BTC network today. Since Satoshi first stepped back from the Bitcoin project in late 2010, other developers who managed the project in later years removed parts they felt were unnecessary and added additional conditions.

Many of these changes were poorly documented and did not record their rationale for implementation, said Connor Murray, BSV Association’s Director of Stewardship. Some were made based on vague or unproven arguments about Bitcoin features, such as transaction malleability. Part of his job at BSVA is to ensure that restored Bitcoin maintains its adherence to Satoshi Nakamoto’s original vision and its guiding set of economic incentives.

Whether these changes were well-intentioned but misguided or part of a deeper conspiracy to limit BTC’s use mainly to speculative market trading remains a contentious debate. Either way, by late 2018, the result was a messy, “Bitcoin-esque” system that couldn’t be used properly as digital cash and couldn’t scale to compete with the world’s other digital payment platforms. Years-long arguments over how (or if) Bitcoin should scale led to two “hard forks” that split the common record into three separate networks: BSV, BTC, and BCH.

“In most cases, these changes were based on the misconception that Bitcoin is a system that uses technology to control its economics rather than an economic system that incentivises technological progress,” wrote BSV developer Brendan Lee in 2019.

Bitcoin, since 2018 as Bitcoin SV or simply BSV, has been functioning well as a massively scalable blockchain network since Genesis was activated in 2020. As well as BSV can process and verify any amount of additional data on-chain. This can include enterprise-tier distributed apps, government records, smart contracts, tokenized assets and stablecoins, games, social media, and rich multimedia files.

Back to the top ↑

Chronicling Chronicle

Murray announced the release of Chronicle with an X post, thanking his fellow developers, including Darren Kellenschwiler, Brendan Lee, TonesNotes, Freddie Honahan, and the team at STAS Token.

“Getting this right was especially important to me as someone who has been involved with BSV since its inception in 2018,” he wrote. “I have spent countless hours evangelizing the importance of restoring the original protocol and removing the restrictions that have been imposed on application developers – enabling unrestricted creativity in the use of Bitcoin Script and the underlying Bitcoin protocol.”

“I also have spent countless hours detailing the importance of a fixed and locked protocol, like Satoshi always intended. As a result, this promised release required care to ensure that Bitcoin’s original protocol could be further restored, while promoting stability to existing businesses and applications.”;

The Chronicle’s final alterations were made after a close examination of all changes made to the base protocol in Bitcoin’s history, and an attempt was made to determine the reasons behind them. Bitcoin was always meant to scale. Chronicle completes that vision while the BSV network awaits its true calling as the foundation of a high-speed, beneficial, world digital economy.

Back to the top ↑

Watch | Siggi Óskarsson: Overview of Teranode’s progress

frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” referrerpolicy=”strict-origin-when-cross-origin” allowfullscreen>

Source: https://coingeek.com/chronicle-completes-bsv-mission-to-restore-original-bitcoin-protocol/

Market Opportunity
BitcoinSV Logo
BitcoinSV Price(BSV)
$18.21
$18.21$18.21
-1.35%
USD
BitcoinSV (BSV) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37