I built MockMyData.io in 10 weeks - a multi-tenant SaaS that lets developers generate mock REST APIs in seconds. Each project gets its own subdomain, API key, andI built MockMyData.io in 10 weeks - a multi-tenant SaaS that lets developers generate mock REST APIs in seconds. Each project gets its own subdomain, API key, and

I Built a Mock API Platform in 2.5 Months (Django + React + Redis + PostgreSQL)

The Problem

When building frontends, I didn't want to hardcode JSON data everywhere. I wanted to build against actual API endpoints and practice the integration work, but spinning up a real backend for every prototype felt like overkill.

After doing this dance too many times - writing throwaway Express servers or mocking fetch calls with static JSON - I realized other developers probably face this same friction.

The typical workflow looked like this:

1. Start building a React component

2. Realize I need user data

3. Choose between: hardcoded JSON arrays OR spinning up Express/Django

4. If I chose Django: pip install requirements, define models, run migrations, write views/URLs, configure CORS

5. All this before writing a single line of frontend logic

This context-switching killed momentum. I'd spend 30 minutes on backend setup for a feature that takes 10 minutes to prototype. Multiply this across dozens of projects, and you've lost days to infrastructure overhead.

That's why I built MockMyData.io.

What It Does

MockMyData.io lets developers generate mock REST API endpoints in seconds. When you sign up, you're automatically assigned a subdomain and API key. Then you define your data schema (field names and types) to create your endpoints.

You can either:

Enter custom JSON - Full control over your mock data

Auto-generate records - MockMyData.io creates realistic data based on your field types

Want to try it? Head to https://mockmydata.io - you can generate a demo mock API right from the landing page and start making requests immediately. No sign-up required.

Perfect for:

  • Frontend developers building features before backend APIs are ready
  • Mobile app developers testing API integration without backend dependencies
  • Building portfolio projects and demos without complex backend setup
  • Students and bootcamp grads learning API consumption
  • Rapid prototyping when you need to validate ideas fast

The Journey: 2.5 Months Solo

I went from concept to launch in about 10 weeks, building everything myself. The aggressive timeline kept me focused on shipping rather than over-engineering.

Tech Stack:

  • Backend: Django REST Framework
  • Frontend: React with Material-UI
  • Database: PostgreSQL
  • Caching: Redis
  • Payments: Stripe
  • Auth: Firebase SSO
  • Hosting: Render.com

Architecture Decisions

Multi-Tenant Subdomain Architecture

The core challenge was giving each project its own API endpoint while keeping infrastructure simple. I went with subdomain-based routing where users get automatically assigned subdomains on signup (e.g., `random-name-123.api.mockmydata.io`). Pro users can create custom subdomains and change them anytime.

How it works:

- User signs up and gets assigned a subdomain

- Pro users can customize: `mycompany.api.mockmydata.io`

- All API requests hit their subdomain endpoint

Implementation challenges:

1. DNS Management

Had to set up wildcard DNS records pointing all subdomains to the same server. Used Cloudflare for DNS with a wildcard A record (`*.api.mockmydata.io`).

2. SSL Certificates

Needed wildcard SSL certificates to handle unlimited subdomains. Render.com handles automatic SSL certificate provisioning and renewal for wildcard domains, which simplified deployment significantly.

3. Request Routing

Django's URL routing doesn't natively support subdomain-based tenant isolation. Built custom middleware to:

- Extract subdomain from request

- Look up project in database

- Attach project context to request object

- Route to appropriate data

# Simplified middleware example class SubdomainMiddleware: def init(self, get_response): self.get_response = get_response def call(self, request): subdomain = request.get_host().split('.')[0] try: project = Project.objects.get(subdomain=subdomain) request.project = project except Project.DoesNotExist: return HttpResponse('Project not found', status=404) return self.get_response(request)

Database Design

Used PostgreSQL with a shared schema approach rather than separate databases per tenant. Each endpoint and record has a `project_id` foreign key. This keeps infrastructure simple while maintaining data isolation through application-level filtering.

Why not separate databases per tenant?

- Simpler infrastructure (one database to manage)

- Easier backups and migrations

- Cost-effective for free tier users

- Row-level security handles isolation

Technical Challenge

#1: Multi-Tier Rate Limiting

This was trickier than expected. I needed two types of rate limiting:

Daily Quotas - Tier-based limits

- Free: 100 requests/day,

- Pro: Unlimited

Request Throttling - Spam prevention

- All tiers: Max 60 requests/minute

Why Redis?

Needed atomic increments and TTL support. Redis handles both perfectly:

def check_daily_quota(self, user): """Hard limits for FREE users""" daily_count = self.get_daily_count(user.id) DAILY_LIMIT = 100 if daily_count >= DAILY_LIMIT: return False, f'Daily limit reached ({DAILY_LIMIT} requests/day)' return True, 'OK' # CloudFlare helps with rate limiting and makes it simple and reliable

The Challenge: Making this performant at scale

- Redis calls add latency

- Need to fail fast for rate-limited requests

- Must be accurate (can't lose count data)

Solution: Batched Redis commands using pipelines reduced roundtrips, cutting rate-check latency significantly. I also implemented a circuit breaker pattern - if Redis goes down, requests pass through to prevent complete service outage.

Technical Challenge #2: Handling Pro-to-Free Downgrades

Free users can create up to 3 endpoints. However, when Pro users downgrade to Free, they might already have dozens of endpoints created. Rather than force them to delete endpoints, I let them choose which 3 remain active and accessible via API.

This required:

- Real-time enforcement in middleware before database queries

- Caching to avoid N+1 queries on every API request

- Graceful Redis fallback if caching fails

The system checks endpoint access on every API request:

#(Sample code) def _check_endpoint_selection(self, request, user, project):     """Check if endpoint is accessible for downgraded free users"""     # Pro users: all endpoints accessible     if user.is_pro_active:         return True, None       # Count total endpoints (cached)     endpoint_count = cache.get(f'project:{project.id}:endpoint_count')     # If <=3 endpoints total, all are accessible     if endpoint_count <= 3:         return True, None     # They have >3 endpoints (downgraded from Pro)     # Check if THIS endpoint is in their selected 3     endpoint = cache.get(f'endpoint:{project.id}:{path}')     if not endpoint.default_selected:         return False, JsonResponse({             'error': 'Endpoint Not Selected',             'message': 'This endpoint is not in your active selection. Free users can only have 3 active endpoints.',             'action_required': 'Visit your dashboard to manage active endpoints'         }, status=403)  # If cache miss then we fetch from database

This gracefully handles downgrades without data loss - users keep all their endpoints but must choose which 3 are live.

Technical Challenge #3: Handling Anonymous Demo Endpoints

Users can create temporary mock APIs without signing up. These urls expire within a short time and have strict limits on the total requests. The challenge was:

- Storing temporary projects in Redis (not database)

- Enforcing limits without database writes

- Supporting full CRUD operations on anonymous data

- Updating Redis cache after POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE

All anonymous endpoints get a `demo-` prefix and live entirely in Redis with proper cache updates after mutations.

Technical Challenge #4: Storage Limits & Payload Validation

Implemented 4-layer protection to prevent abuse:

Layer 1: Request payload size

- Free: 5KB per request

- Pro: 30KB per request

Layer 2: Individual field size

- Free: 2KB per field

- Pro: 10KB per field

Layer 3: Item count per endpoint

- Free: 20 items

- Pro: 200 items

Layer 4: Total endpoint storage

- Free: 15KB per endpoint

- Pro: 400KB per endpoint

This prevents users from storing massive datasets while keeping the service performant and cost-effective.

What's Next: Django Project Generator

I'm building a feature that exports your mock API as production-ready backend code starting with Django. Here's how it works:

Input: Your MockMyData.io project with endpoints defined

Output: Complete Django REST Framework project with:

- Models generated from your schema

- Serializers for each endpoint

- CRUD operations

- URL routing configured

- Authentication setup (Optional)

- README with additional instructions & Suggestions

Example transformation:

Your MockMyData endpoint:

{ "name": "users", "fields": { "username": "string", "email": "email", "age": "integer" } }

Generates Django model:

class User(models.Model): username = models.CharField(max_length=255) email = models.EmailField() age = models.IntegerField() created_at = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)

Plus serializers, views, and URLs - everything a user need to run their server right away. I also plan on exploring other backends too

Why this matters:

Turns MockMyData.io from a testing tool into a full development accelerator. Prototype with mock data, export to production code when ready.

Lessons Learned

1. Ship fast, iterate faster

The 2.5-month timeline was aggressive but kept me focused on shipping. Rather than building every possible feature upfront, I launched with the core product working and plan to aggressively iterate based on what users actually need.

2. Rate limiting is harder than you think

Especially across multiple tiers and preventing race conditions. Redis pipelines were essential.

3. Cache everything strategically

Redis saved my infrastructure costs. Without caching, I'd be paying 3-4x more for database and compute.

4. Stripe webhooks are your friend

Once you understand them. The documentation is excellent, and webhook-driven subscription management is reliable

6. Build for failure

My circuit breaker pattern for Redis means the service stays up even when caching fails. Graceful degradation is better than complete outages.

Try It Out

🚀 [https://mockmydata.io]() - Free tier available, no credit card required

🎉 Launching on Product Hunt January 14th - Would love your support!

💬 Questions I'd love feedback on:

What backend frameworks would you want for code export? (Django, Express, FastAPI, Rails?)

What's missing that would make this a must-have tool for you?

Drop a comment below - happy to answer questions about Django, React, multi-tenant architecture, or building a SaaS solo! You can also connect with me @marcuscodes.

Market Opportunity
Wrapped REACT Logo
Wrapped REACT Price(REACT)
$0.0369
$0.0369$0.0369
-0.53%
USD
Wrapped REACT (REACT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37