Must Read
Manny Pangilinan's MGEN Corp., however, says the company that got a congressional franchise, Solar Para sa Bayan, is different from SP New Energy Corp. which MGENManny Pangilinan's MGEN Corp., however, says the company that got a congressional franchise, Solar Para sa Bayan, is different from SP New Energy Corp. which MGEN
Ombudsman Remulla says Leviste being probed for ‘selling’ solar franchise to Pangilinan
MANILA, Philippines – Batangas Representative Leandro Leviste is being investigated for “selling” the franchise of his solar energy business to tycoon Manny V. Pangilinan, according to Ombudsman Jesus Crispin “Boying” Remulla.
In a radio show on DZRH on Saturday, January 10, Remulla assailed Leviste for “flipping” Solar Philippines to Pangilinan after securing a franchise to put up solar microgrids in select provinces nationwide during the Rodrigo Duterte administration.
“Kasi dapat yun yung franchise ‘di dapat ninenegosyo yun e. Batang-bata binebenta mo yung franchise, wala ka bang kahihiyan? Anong klaseng Pilipino yan?” he said.
(A franchise shouldn’t be made into a business. He’s so young yet he’s selling a franchise, has he no shame? What kind of Filipino are you?)
“National franchise, renewable energy, critical to the national life tapos ganun lang? Tapos, ‘bebenta mo, fi-flip mo lang? Nanay mo [Loren Legarda] pa senador,” Remulla said.
(National franchise, renewable energy, critical to national life and then you sell just like that? You sell it, you flip it. And your mother is even a senator.)
Duterte signed Republic Act No. 11357 into law on July 31, 2019, providing a franchise to Leviste’s Solar Para Sa Bayan Corporation.
Remulla said this was the more important issue than the Cathy Cabral files which Leviste has exposed, adding that the files the congressman has are questionable.
“Kasi marami s’yang ibang problema e. Yung prangkisa n’ya ineembistiga na ngayon e… Yung ang pagusapan muna natin, bago ang lahat,” he said.
(He has other problems. His franchise is being investigated now… That’s what we should talk about first before anything else.)
“Mas mabigat na isyu yung sa franchise n’ya. Remember, walang consent ang Congress sa transfer ng franchise na ‘yan. Critical ‘yan.”
(His franchise is a bigger issue. Remember, there’s no consent from Congress for the transfer of the franchise. That’s critical.)
Remulla also alleged that Leviste’s companies have a total of “84 cancelled [solar energy] contracts so far,” with significant impact on the country’s energy outlook.
“Can you imagine the effect on the national energy situation. Sasabihin mo eto na ang forecast natin sa energy, andyan ang DOE [Department of Energy], naniniwala sayo, yun pala drawing lang,” he said.
(Can you imagine the effect on the national energy situation? You give a forecast on energy, the DOE is there, it believes you and then it turns out to be just a drawing.)
In an apparent response to Remulla’s statements, Leviste said he would respond to all the accusations made against him when Congress resumes its session on January 26.
“Bibigyan ko kayo ng dalawang linggo para sabihin ang lahat. Sasagutin ko ang lahat sa pagbubukas ng Kongreso sa January 26,” Leviste said in a social media post, without specifying who he was referring to.
(I will give you two weeks to say everything. I will answer all when Congress opens on January 26.)
During a Senate hearing on the budget of the Department of Energy (DOE) last October, Energy Undersecretary Rowena Guevarra disclosed that 21 solar energy contracts of Leviste’s Solar Philippines are “being processed for termination due to the company’s failure to deliver the scheduled targets.”
Rappler’s business columnist Val Villanueva, in his latest column, said the case of Leviste’s Solar Philippines “exposes how the country’s renewable-energy framework can be gamed.”
Pangilinan’s Metro Pacific Investments Corporation started investing in Leviste’s SP New Energy Corporation (SPNEC) in March 2023, and by December 2023, Manila Electric Company subsidiary, Meralco PowerGen Corporation (MGEN), had completed its P15.9-billion buyout in Leviste’s SP New Energy Corporation (SPNEC), effectively becoming the controlling shareholder with 50.5% voting rights.
Leviste became the vice chairman of SPNEC while Pangilinan assumed the role of chairman, president, and CEO of SPNEC.
MGEN, in a media statement on Sunday, January 11, said SPNEC is a “separate and distinct corporate entity from Solar Para sa Bayan Corporation (SPBC),” the Leviste company that got a 25-year congressional franchise during the Duterte administration.
SPNEC, however, is a subsidiary of Solar Philippines.
“MGEN did not acquire any share in SPBC, which was awarded a congressional franchise thru Republic Act 11357 to construct and install and operate microgrids in remote areas. Moreover, MGEN is not privy to any transactions of SPBC nor to any circumstances that may relate to its compliance with its franchise,” the power firm said.
Thus, MGEN said “SPNEC’s business and operations are not dependent on the franchise mentioned.”
MGEN also insisted that its investment in SPNEC “did not violate any law or regulation,” noting that “the transactions of SPNEC, including the entry of MGEN through its affiliates” were “scrutinized and approved by the Philippine Stock Exchange and the Securities and Exchange Commission.”
On Sunday, Leviste also reposted MGEN’s media statement on his Facebook page.
– Rappler.com
Market Opportunity
Smart Pocket Price(SP)
$0.00033
$0.00033$0.00033
USD
Smart Pocket (SP) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
Why Bitcoin’s Bear Case Is Suddenly Back on the Table
Fear, Liquidity, and Market Structure Collide at a Critical Moment
Bitcoin has spent most of January 2026 trading under pressure, slipping below key psycho
Share
Medium2026/01/20 20:55
USD/JPY drops to near 157.80 as US-EU disputes batter US Dollar
The post USD/JPY drops to near 157.80 as US-EU disputes batter US Dollar appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The USD/JPY pair is down 0.2% to near 157.80 during
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/20 21:27
MetaMask Token: Exciting Launch Could Be Sooner Than Expected
BitcoinWorld MetaMask Token: Exciting Launch Could Be Sooner Than Expected The cryptocurrency community is buzzing with exciting news: a native MetaMask token might arrive sooner than many anticipated. This development could reshape how users interact with the popular Web3 wallet and the broader decentralized ecosystem. It signals a significant step forward for one of the most widely used tools in the blockchain space. What’s Fueling the MetaMask Token Buzz? Joseph Lubin, the CEO of ConsenSys, the company behind MetaMask, recently shared insights that ignited this excitement. According to reports from The Block, Lubin indicated that a MetaMask token could launch ahead of previous expectations. This isn’t the first time the idea has surfaced; Dan Finlay, one of MetaMask’s founders, had previously mentioned the possibility of issuing such a token. ConsenSys has been a pivotal player in the Ethereum ecosystem, developing essential infrastructure and applications. MetaMask, their flagship wallet, serves millions of users, providing a gateway to decentralized applications (dApps), NFTs, and various blockchain networks. Therefore, any move to introduce a native token is a major event for the entire Web3 community. Why is a MetaMask Token So Anticipated? The prospect of a MetaMask token generates immense interest because it could introduce new layers of utility and community governance. Users often speculate about the benefits such a token could offer. Here are some key reasons for the high anticipation: Governance Rights: A token could empower users to participate in the future direction and development of MetaMask. This means voting on new features, upgrades, or even changes to the platform’s policies. Ecosystem Rewards: Tokens might be distributed as rewards for active participation, using certain features, or contributing to the MetaMask community. This incentivizes engagement and loyalty. Enhanced Utility: The token could unlock premium features, reduce transaction fees, or provide exclusive access to services within the MetaMask ecosystem or partnered dApps. Decentralization: Introducing a token often aligns with the broader Web3 ethos of decentralization, distributing control and ownership among its users rather than centralizing it within ConsenSys. Consequently, a token launch is seen as a way to deepen user involvement and foster a more robust, community-driven ecosystem around the wallet. Exploring the Potential Impact of a MetaMask Token The introduction of a MetaMask token could have far-reaching implications for the decentralized finance (DeFi) and Web3 landscape. Firstly, it could set a new standard for how popular infrastructure tools engage with their user base. By providing a tangible stake, MetaMask might strengthen its position as a community-governed platform. Moreover, a token could significantly boost the wallet’s visibility and adoption, attracting new users eager to participate in its governance or benefit from its utility. This could also lead to innovative integrations with other blockchain projects, creating a more interconnected and efficient Web3 experience. Ultimately, the success of such a token will depend on its design, utility, and how effectively it engages the global MetaMask community. What Challenges Could a MetaMask Token Face? While the excitement is palpable, launching a MetaMask token also presents several challenges that ConsenSys must navigate carefully. One primary concern is regulatory scrutiny. The classification of cryptocurrency tokens varies across jurisdictions, and ensuring compliance is crucial for long-term success. Furthermore, designing a fair and equitable distribution model is paramount. Ensuring that the token provides genuine utility beyond mere speculation will be another hurdle. A token must integrate seamlessly into the MetaMask experience and offer clear value to its holders. Additionally, managing community expectations and preventing market manipulation will require robust strategies. Addressing these challenges effectively will be key to the token’s sustainable growth and positive reception. What’s Next for the MetaMask Ecosystem? The prospect of a MetaMask token signals an evolving strategy for ConsenSys and the future of Web3 wallets. It reflects a growing trend where foundational tools seek to empower their communities through tokenization. Users are keenly watching for official announcements regarding the token’s mechanics, distribution, and launch timeline. This development could solidify MetaMask’s role not just as a wallet, but as a central pillar of decentralized identity and interaction. The potential for a sooner-than-expected launch adds an element of urgency and excitement, encouraging users to stay informed about every new detail. It represents a significant milestone for a platform that has become synonymous with accessing the decentralized web. Conclusion The hints from ConsenSys CEO Joseph Lubin regarding an earlier launch for the MetaMask token have undoubtedly captured the attention of the entire crypto world. This potential development promises to bring enhanced governance, utility, and community engagement to millions of MetaMask users. While challenges exist, the underlying potential for a more decentralized and user-driven ecosystem is immense. The coming months will likely reveal more about this highly anticipated token, marking a new chapter for one of Web3’s most vital tools. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What is a MetaMask token? A MetaMask token would be a native cryptocurrency issued by ConsenSys, the company behind the MetaMask wallet. It is expected to offer various utilities, including governance rights, rewards, and access to special features within the MetaMask ecosystem. Q2: Why is ConsenSys considering launching a MetaMask token? ConsenSys is likely exploring a token launch to further decentralize the MetaMask platform, empower its user community with governance rights, incentivize active participation, and potentially unlock new forms of utility and growth for the ecosystem. Q3: What benefits could users gain from a MetaMask token? Users could gain several benefits, such as the ability to vote on MetaMask’s future developments, earn rewards for using the wallet, access exclusive features, or potentially reduce transaction fees. It also provides a direct stake in the platform’s success. Q4: When is the MetaMask token expected to launch? While no official launch date has been confirmed, ConsenSys CEO Joseph Lubin has indicated that the launch could happen sooner than previously expected. The exact timeline remains subject to official announcements from ConsenSys. Q5: How would a MetaMask token impact the broader Web3 ecosystem? A MetaMask token could significantly impact Web3 by setting a precedent for user-owned and governed infrastructure tools. It could drive further decentralization, foster innovation, and strengthen the connection between users and the platforms they rely on, ultimately contributing to a more robust and participatory decentralized internet. To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping Ethereum institutional adoption. This post MetaMask Token: Exciting Launch Could Be Sooner Than Expected first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/19 15:40