In the crypto space, saturated with scams, empty partnerships, and decaying incentives, the only growth engine that still works is trust.In the crypto space, saturated with scams, empty partnerships, and decaying incentives, the only growth engine that still works is trust.

The death of crypto marketing: Why founders became the product interface | Opinion

2026/01/09 23:26
5 min read

Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed here belong solely to the author and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news’ editorial.

For most of crypto’s short history, growth followed a simple formula: reward behavior, and it will repeat. Liquidity mining, referral loops, token launches, airdrops. If adoption slowed, teams increased the incentives. When that stopped working, they layered on marketing campaigns, splashy announcements, and logo-filled partnership decks. That era is over.

Summary
  • Crypto growth stalled because trust collapsed: incentives, airdrops, and marketing no longer convert in a market saturated with scams, fake metrics, and empty signals.
  • Founder credibility has become the growth engine: consistent, public explanation builds compounding trust, defines the narrative, and creates adoption that campaigns can’t buy.
  • Founders are now infrastructure: belief, coherence, and conviction are the real distribution layer — and when trust is scarce, credibility becomes the product.

Crypto didn’t stall because people forgot how to market. It stalled because the industry had exhausted trust. In a market where scams surface daily, rug pulls are routine, and metrics can be manufactured, buyers stopped believing what they were being shown. The result is uncomfortable but obvious: attention no longer converts.

The marginal return on spend is collapsing because none of these mechanisms answer the real question buyers are asking anymore: who can I trust? When trust disappears, growth doesn’t follow money. It follows credibility.

This is why a new system has quietly replaced traditional crypto marketing: founder-credibility driven growth. In this model, the primary driver of adoption is not rewards, spend, or partnerships. It is the founder’s ability to consistently earn trust by explaining, teaching, and embodying the product in public.

But this isn’t just personal branding. It’s something more structural.

Markets no longer discover products through landing pages. They discover them through people who show up repeatedly with the same worldview, the same logic, and the same intellectual posture. Buyers don’t want dashboards. They want explanations they can repeat internally. They want mental models they can borrow when convincing teams that don’t live on crypto Twitter.

This is also why campaigns and fake logo partnerships are dead. They once worked because the market was naïve, but all they signal today is performance rather than any substance. A press release filled with logos doesn’t signal legitimacy anymore — it signals theatre. In a trust-depleted market, anything that feels manufactured is discounted instantly.

Founder-credibility-driven growth model

Founder-credibility-driven growth flips the old model on its head. I’ve watched this pattern repeat across dozens of teams. Products with strong technology but weak founder presence struggled to move beyond early adopters, even with serious budgets. Meanwhile, other products — sometimes technically simpler — pulled in disproportionate inbound interest because the founder kept explaining the same problem in the same way until the market finally understood it.

The difference? Coherence.

A campaign can generate awareness. It cannot generate conviction. Founder-credibility-driven growth works because it performs three functions that incentives never could.

  • First, it compounds. Campaigns are episodic. They flare up and vanish. Founder narratives accumulate. Every explanation builds context for the next. Over time, the market doesn’t just recognize the product — it understands it.
  • Second, founder-driven growth creates defensibility. Institutions don’t adopt things they can’t explain. Founders who teach the market how to think about a problem don’t just promote products — they define the language people use to justify decisions internally.
  • Third, this type of growth creates trust asymmetry. In a market saturated with noise, the person who keeps showing up with clarity becomes the reference point everyone else measures against.

This shift is uncomfortable because it changes who owns growth. Go-to-market is no longer something you can fully outsource. You can pay for campaigns. You cannot pay for belief.

Vision, philosophy, and conviction are non-transferable. The market doesn’t want a spokesperson. It wants the person who made the trade-offs. You can hire someone to write your announcements. You cannot hire someone to embody your worldview.

That is why founders have quietly become infrastructure. They are no longer just builders. They are the distribution layer through which markets learn how to adopt increasingly complex financial systems.

Crypto marketing isn’t dying because teams stopped trying. It’s dying because the interface changed. And in a space saturated with scams, empty partnerships, and decaying incentives, the only growth engine that still works is authentic, founder-credibility-driven trust.

When trust becomes scarce, credibility becomes the product.

Dean Khan Dhillon

Dean Khan Dhillon is the Head of Growth at RWA.xyz, a data analytics platform focused on tokenised assets. He specializes in RWA adoption, crypto market structure, and GTM for crypto infrastructure. Previously, Dean was CEO of fortyIQ, a crypto GTM and thought leadership firm, which he scaled to $2M ARR in under a year, and worked with over 25+ leading blockchain protocols such as Babylon, Initia, and Syndicate.

Market Opportunity
Intuition Logo
Intuition Price(TRUST)
$0.0753
$0.0753$0.0753
+1.78%
USD
Intuition (TRUST) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6

The post SEI Technical Analysis Feb 6 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEI is consolidating at the $0.08 level under general downtrend pressure; although RSI
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:43
South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin

The post South Korean Crypto Exchange Accidentally Gave Away $95 Billion in Bitcoin appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief South Korean exchange Bithumb
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/07 02:16