Cambodia’s central bank has suspended all new operations at Prince Bank Plc. and ordered its liquidation, following the arrest and extradition of the bank’s founderCambodia’s central bank has suspended all new operations at Prince Bank Plc. and ordered its liquidation, following the arrest and extradition of the bank’s founder

Fraud Fallout: Cambodia Liquidates Prince Bank After Founder Extradited

Cambodia’s central bank has suspended all new operations at Prince Bank Plc. and ordered its liquidation, following the arrest and extradition of the bank’s founder, Chen Zhi, in a sweeping international fraud case. The move marks a sharp escalation in the government’s response to alleged transnational scam networks linked to the bank’s parent company.

The National Bank of Cambodia (NBC) said Thursday that Prince Bank is no longer allowed to accept new deposits or issue loans and has been formally placed under liquidation under Cambodian law. The bank, which operates branches across the country, will be overseen by appointed liquidators from Morisonkak MKA Audit Accounting Co. Ltd., who will manage remaining operations and assets.

NBC officials said depositors may still withdraw funds with proper documentation, and borrowers must continue making payments under their existing contracts. The central bank acted after Cambodian authorities confirmed that Chen Zhi, a wealthy businessman, was arrested in Phnom Penh and extradited to China on Jan. 6, 2026, in connection with allegations of operating large-scale online fraud.

Extradition of Chen Zhi Fuels Financial Action

Chen Zhi, a Chinese-born tycoon who built Prince Bank as part of his Prince Holding Group conglomerate, was shown in Chinese media being led off a plane in handcuffs after his extradition. State broadcasters in China described him as a leader of a major transnational gambling and fraud crime syndicate.

He faces accusations from U.S., Chinese and Western authorities over alleged cyberfraud operations, including “pig butchering” scams that used fake online relationships and investment schemes to defraud victims of large sums. Before his arrest, U.S. prosecutors indicted him on fraud and money laundering charges, and authorities in the U.S. and U.K. seized digital assets and froze properties linked to him.

For years, Chen was known in Cambodia as a prominent businessman and philanthropist, with close ties to political leaders and a portfolio that included real estate, airlines and financial services. His sharp fall from influence followed months of international scrutiny of scam networks that allegedly operated in the region, prompting pressure on Cambodian authorities to act.

Implications for Cambodia’s Banking Sector

The liquidation of Prince Bank — a notable player in Cambodia’s banking sector — underscores growing concerns about the entanglement of financial institutions with alleged fraud operations. Regulatory officials have reiterated that the action aims to protect depositors and financial stability while further investigations proceed.

Analysts say the case could trigger broader scrutiny of Cambodia’s oversight of financial and technology-linked enterprises, particularly those with international operations. Financial markets and customers are likely to watch closely as liquidators manage Prince Bank’s remaining assets and obligations.

The central bank did not immediately respond to requests for comment beyond its liquidation announcement. Prince Bank and affiliated companies have not issued public statements responding to the developments.

It also intersects with Cambodia’s crypto market because U.S. authorities have alleged the wider network used cryptocurrency investment fraud and laundering, which can push tighter scrutiny on crypto-linked payments and on banking rails tied to digital-asset flows

Market Opportunity
Lorenzo Protocol Logo
Lorenzo Protocol Price(BANK)
$0.05234
$0.05234$0.05234
-0.43%
USD
Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Will XRP Price Increase In September 2025?

Ripple XRP is a cryptocurrency that primarily focuses on building a decentralised payments network to facilitate low-cost and cross-border transactions. It’s a native digital currency of the Ripple network, which works as a blockchain called the XRP Ledger (XRPL). It utilised a shared, distributed ledger to track account balances and transactions. What Do XRP Charts Reveal? […]
Share
Tronweekly2025/09/18 00:00
China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise

The post China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. China Blocks Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D as Local Chips Rise China’s internet regulator has ordered the country’s biggest technology firms, including Alibaba and ByteDance, to stop purchasing Nvidia’s RTX Pro 6000D GPUs. According to the Financial Times, the move shuts down the last major channel for mass supplies of American chips to the Chinese market. Why Beijing Halted Nvidia Purchases Chinese companies had planned to buy tens of thousands of RTX Pro 6000D accelerators and had already begun testing them in servers. But regulators intervened, halting the purchases and signaling stricter controls than earlier measures placed on Nvidia’s H20 chip. Image: Nvidia An audit compared Huawei and Cambricon processors, along with chips developed by Alibaba and Baidu, against Nvidia’s export-approved products. Regulators concluded that Chinese chips had reached performance levels comparable to the restricted U.S. models. This assessment pushed authorities to advise firms to rely more heavily on domestic processors, further tightening Nvidia’s already limited position in China. China’s Drive Toward Tech Independence The decision highlights Beijing’s focus on import substitution — developing self-sufficient chip production to reduce reliance on U.S. supplies. “The signal is now clear: all attention is focused on building a domestic ecosystem,” said a representative of a leading Chinese tech company. Nvidia had unveiled the RTX Pro 6000D in July 2025 during CEO Jensen Huang’s visit to Beijing, in an attempt to keep a foothold in China after Washington restricted exports of its most advanced chips. But momentum is shifting. Industry sources told the Financial Times that Chinese manufacturers plan to triple AI chip production next year to meet growing demand. They believe “domestic supply will now be sufficient without Nvidia.” What It Means for the Future With Huawei, Cambricon, Alibaba, and Baidu stepping up, China is positioning itself for long-term technological independence. Nvidia, meanwhile, faces…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:37