The post California’s proposed billionaire tax divides tech industry appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A plan to tax California’s billionaires has tech leadersThe post California’s proposed billionaire tax divides tech industry appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. A plan to tax California’s billionaires has tech leaders

California’s proposed billionaire tax divides tech industry

5 min read

A plan to tax California’s billionaires has tech leaders picking sides: some say they’ll pay up, others are packing their bags for different states.

Here’s what’s on the table: any California resident worth more than $1 billion would pay a one-time tax of 5 percent on their assets. The money would go to schools, food assistance programs, and healthcare across the state.

Tech elite are divided on the proposal

Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, worth nearly $159 billion, told Bloomberg Television this week he’s fine with it.

“We chose to live in Silicon Valley,” Huang said. “And whatever taxes, I guess they would like to apply, so be it.”

But he’s pretty much alone among tech’s elite. Google co-founder Larry Page, Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel, and David Sacks, Donald Trump’s new AI and crypto czar, have all recently said they’re leaving California for states with friendlier tax policies like Florida and Texas.

The Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West is pushing the tax proposal. If it passes, it kicks in retroactively for anyone who was a California resident as of January 1 this year. Billionaires would get five years to pay.

That means Huang would owe around $7 billion. Page’s bill would come to about $13 billion, and Thiel would pay roughly $1.3 billion based on what they’re worth now.

Suzanne Jimenez, chief of staff for SEIU-UHW, says the current system isn’t fair. “Regular working people pay higher effective tax rates than the wealthiest Americans,” she wrote in an email. “Asking those who have benefited most from the economy to contribute more – particularly to stabilize health care systems under direct threat – is a reasonable step.”

The proposal still has a ways to go. Under California law, supporters need to collect 874,641 signatures to get it on the November ballot. Then Governor Gavin Newsom would have to sign it, and he’s already said he’s against a wealth tax.

“You can’t isolate yourself from the 49 others,” Newsom said at last month’s New York Times DealBook Summit. “We’re in a competitive environment.”

That puts him at odds with Ro Khanna, the California congressman who represents Silicon Valley. Khanna’s been a big supporter of taxing the ultra-wealthy. He thinks tech billionaires will stay put despite the tax because California is where the industry, innovation, and talent are. “A billionaire tax is good for American innovation,” Khanna said, arguing it spreads wealth to other sectors.

When Thiel announced he was leaving over the proposed tax, Khanna posted on X: “I echo what FDR said with sarcasm of economic royalists when they threatened to leave, ‘I will miss them very much.’”

Not the first time billionaires have left

This isn’t California’s first rodeo with billionaire departures. Elon Musk, the world’s richest person, left for Texas in 2020, saving himself millions in taxes. He’s moved several company headquarters there too. Last year, he said he was relocating SpaceX to Texas because of a California law protecting transgender kids in schools. He called it a “final straw.”

Texas has become a popular destination for tech billionaires because it doesn’t have a state income tax. Palantir co-founder Joe Lonsdale moved to Austin in 2020 for better tax treatment. Larry Ellison moved Oracle’s headquarters there the same year (though he’s now moving the company to Nashville). Michael Dell, who founded Dell Technologies, has lived in Texas for years.

Sacks announced his move on December 31, posting a Texas flag on X and writing: “God bless Texas.” The next day, he added: “As a response to socialism, Miami will replace NYC as the finance capital and Austin will replace SF as the tech capital.”

Musk, Lonsdale, and Dell all welcomed him warmly. “No one will fight harder for the independent and free spirit of Texas than people who know [sic] it’s like when that’s taken away,” Musk wrote.

Page hasn’t said publicly where he’s going, but companies linked to him filed incorporation papers in Florida last month, according to the New York Times. Thiel, who owns a house in the Hollywood Hills, looks to be headed to Florida too. His investment firm, Thiel Capital, announced on December 31 that it had opened a Miami office. The firm said Thiel has kept a home there since 2020.

On X, tech investors and billionaires have blasted the wealth tax idea. Chamath Palihapitiya, a venture capitalist and former Facebook exec, said without billionaires, California’s “budget deficit will only get bigger.” Vinod Khosla, another investor, warned that “California will lose its most important taxpayers and net off much worse.”

Some are talking about going after Khanna’s congressional seat. Martin Casado, a partner at Andreessen Horowitz, wrote that Khanna had “devolved into an obnoxious jerk” and that his support for the wealth tax had turned off moderate voters. Garry Tan, CEO of startup accelerator Y Combinator, responded: “Time to primary him.”

Jimenez from SEIU pointed to Massachusetts and Washington, which have other types of wealth taxes. She said those states have raised billions while high-income residents kept seeing their portfolios grow. The union is “heartened” by Huang’s comments and hopes more billionaires will follow his lead.

As for Huang, he said Nvidia is in Silicon Valley because that’s where the engineers are, and he’s not worried about a billionaire tax.

“Not this person,” Huang said. “This person is trying to build the future of AI.”

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/california-proposed-billionaire-tax-divides/

Market Opportunity
LightLink Logo
LightLink Price(LL)
$0.003409
$0.003409$0.003409
-4.61%
USD
LightLink (LL) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

USDT Transfer Stuns Market: $238 Million Whale Movement to Bitfinex Reveals Critical Patterns

USDT Transfer Stuns Market: $238 Million Whale Movement to Bitfinex Reveals Critical Patterns

BitcoinWorld USDT Transfer Stuns Market: $238 Million Whale Movement to Bitfinex Reveals Critical Patterns In a stunning development that captured global cryptocurrency
Share
bitcoinworld2026/02/06 21:45
The market value of NFTs has fallen back to pre-2021 levels, close to $1.5 billion.

The market value of NFTs has fallen back to pre-2021 levels, close to $1.5 billion.

PANews reported on February 6th, citing Cointelegraph, that the global NFT market capitalization has fallen below $1.5 billion, returning to pre-2021 levels. This
Share
PANews2026/02/06 21:13
Fed’s Hammack Backs Restrictive Policy Over Fed Rate Cuts

Fed’s Hammack Backs Restrictive Policy Over Fed Rate Cuts

The post Fed’s Hammack Backs Restrictive Policy Over Fed Rate Cuts appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Cleveland Federal Reserve President Beth Hammack has advocated for a restrictive monetary policy amid growing concerns of rising inflation . Her comment comes as Fed officials remain divided on whether they should make a Fed rate cut at the October FOMC meeting, a move that would impact the crypto market. Hammack Raises Inflation Concerns Amid Fed Rate Cut Debate Hammack stated that inflation continues to exceed the Fed’s objective and remains a concern across both headline and core categories. Speaking on CNBC, she noted that price growth remains above the Federal Reserve’s 2% objective and is not expected to return to target until the end of 2027 or early 2028. The Fed president added that pressures are most apparent in the services sector, where inflation has proven more persistent. Notably, her comments follow the first Fed rate cut of the year, two weeks ago at the September FOMC meeting.  In her remarks, Hammack said monetary policy must remain restrictive to ensure progress toward the inflation target, indicating that she doesn’t favor further Fed rate cuts for now. She explained that the Federal Reserve’s dual mandate requires balancing price stability with employment, but argued that inflation remains the greater challenge at present. “When I balance those two sides of our mandate, I think we really need to maintain a restrictive stance of policy so that we can get inflation back down to our goal,” she said. Inflation Over the Jobs Market Hammack pointed to service-related spending as an area where inflationary pressures remain strong. She explained that both headline and main price levels are still above target, with little evidence of near-term relief. She described the U.S. labor market as “reasonably healthy” and overall balanced, noting that current conditions do not show major weaknesses. However, Hammack stressed that maintaining this balance…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/29 23:50