The post Meteora Dominates DeFi in 2025 With $1.25B Fees, Outpacing Uniswap, Jupiter, and Aave appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: Meteora generatedThe post Meteora Dominates DeFi in 2025 With $1.25B Fees, Outpacing Uniswap, Jupiter, and Aave appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Takeaways: Meteora generated

Meteora Dominates DeFi in 2025 With $1.25B Fees, Outpacing Uniswap, Jupiter, and Aave

Key Takeaways:

  • Meteora generated $1.25 billion in protocol fees in 2025, ranking first across all DeFi platforms
  • Only three DeFi protocols crossed the $1B mark, highlighting rising fee concentration at the top
  • DEXs and Solana-based protocols gained share as users favored speed, capital efficiency, and lower costs

Meteora emerged as the highest-earning DeFi protocol of 2025, reflecting a broader shift in where on-chain activity, liquidity, and user demand are concentrating. Fee data shows a DeFi market that is maturing, more competitive, and increasingly selective.

Read More: Binance Lists Meteora (MET) With $3.4M Token Rewards as Solana DeFi Liquidity Race Heats Up

Meteora Takes the Lead in DeFi Fee Generation

Meteora closed 2025 with $1.25 billion in total fees, placing it ahead of every other decentralized finance protocol by revenue. The figure signals more than just strong usage; it shows sustained trading volume, deep liquidity, and high user retention across the year.

Trailing Meteora were Jupiter with $1.11 billion and Uniswap with $1.06 billion, making them the only other protocols to exceed the billion-dollar threshold. Whereas dozens of DeFi networks continued to exist, the generation of fees began to be concentrated in the hands of a small number of large entities.

The ranking supports a major trend: users are diverting volume to protocols which mix speed, small slip, predictable execution, as opposed to dispersing liquidity to fragmented venues.

Top DeFi Protocols by 2025 Fee Revenue

The top three were only marginally ahead of the other protocols which had strong figures, but on the other hand failed to reach the $1B mark. Pump.fun was registered with fees of $937 million, as a result of high-frequency traffic and startups of speculative tokens. Hyperliquid was close behind with $909 million, as it enjoyed the derivatives demand and the active trading communities.

There was also a good performance of liquid staking and lending protocols. Lido collected $846 million, Jito raised $813 million, and Aave received $809 million, which supports the idea of yield, staking, and leverage as some of the most important sources of DeFi revenue.

Raydium and PancakeSwap took up the top, but smaller yet rapidly expanding protocols, such as Fragment and Ethena, still claim hundreds of millions in fees. The statistics indicate that there is good competition, but it is also a growing disparity between the market leaders and others.

Read More: 27 billion WLFI Token Goes Live, Listed on Top DEXs

Why Solana-Based DeFi Is Gaining Ground

The emergence of Meteora is pegged on the performance of Solana in 2025. Solana-native protocols became more appealing to active traders and liquidity providers due to faster block times, reduced fees, and better stability on its network.

Execution Speed and Capital Efficiency

Large-volume traders are becoming more concerned with the quality of execution. The design of Solana enables protocols such as Meteora or Jupiter to provide tighter spreads and confirmations in a significantly shorter time, which directly converts to high capture of fees.

The reduced transaction costs also make possible the strategies that are not feasible on more expensive networks, making activity overall more active without reducing the returns on users.

DEXs Narrow the Gap with Centralized Exchanges

Decentralized exchanges started to rise in 2025 and over 20 percent of the total crypto trading volume was captured in peak times. Although the overall volume remains centralized, the distance between these two systems dropped with the improvement of DEX user experience.

Genuine or more intelligent routing, enhanced wallet integrations, and friction were diminished. The distinction between the centralized and decentralized execution was also blurred to many users, particularly in the spot and on-chain derivatives trade.

Fee data reflects this shift. DEXs no longer have to compete with centralized venues in terms of ideology or self-custody principles only.

Institutions Quietly Drive DeFi Fee Growth

Even though institutional involvement was less apparent than retail, this trend was increasingly contributing to 2025 DeFi revenues. On-chain lending markets were invested in by asset managers, and DeFi rails were added behind the scenes by fintech companies.

Large exchanges experimented with tokenized assets, stablecoin settlement and blockchain-based credit, directing their operations via DeFi protocols instead of conventional intermediaries. Such flows are typically big, steady, and cost-effective and prefer protocols that have known infrastructure. Consequently, there is an increase in fee growth as a structural adoption and not necessarily due to speculative cycles.

Source: https://www.cryptoninjas.net/news/meteora-dominates-defi-in-2025-with-1-25b-fees-outpacing-uniswap-jupiter-and-aave/

Market Opportunity
DeFi Logo
DeFi Price(DEFI)
$0.000351
$0.000351$0.000351
+13.59%
USD
DeFi (DEFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

USDT Market Capitalization Drops by Over $3 Billion, Raising Market Concerns

USDT Market Capitalization Drops by Over $3 Billion, Raising Market Concerns

The post USDT Market Capitalization Drops by Over $3 Billion, Raising Market Concerns appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Tether’s market capitalization has declined
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/26 08:25
US goods inflation has been somewhat affected by tariffs

US goods inflation has been somewhat affected by tariffs

The post US goods inflation has been somewhat affected by tariffs appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) Managing Director Kristalina
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/26 08:33
Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28