TLDR: Industry observers estimate over 80 percent of Polymarket’s trading volume may be artificially generated. Coordinated groups manipulate ICO and token launchTLDR: Industry observers estimate over 80 percent of Polymarket’s trading volume may be artificially generated. Coordinated groups manipulate ICO and token launch

Polymarket Valuation Raises Red Flags: Volume Manipulation and Market Integrity Concerns Surface

2025/12/28 06:58
3 min read

TLDR:

  • Industry observers estimate over 80 percent of Polymarket’s trading volume may be artificially generated.
  • Coordinated groups manipulate ICO and token launch markets, converting high-probability bets into losses.
  • The platform’s $12 billion valuation draws comparisons to OpenSea’s 2022 peak before market collapse.
  • Regulatory scrutiny appears inevitable as gambling and anti-money laundering rules may soon apply.

Polymarket recently secured funding at a $12 billion valuation, drawing comparisons to OpenSea’s 2022 peak. However, critics within the crypto community raise questions about the platform’s long-term sustainability.

The decentralized prediction market faces mounting scrutiny over volume accuracy and market integrity. Industry observers note that operational challenges threaten the platform’s reputation. Meanwhile, concerns about regulatory oversight continue to grow. 

These issues emerge as the platform gains mainstream attention during election cycles and major events.

Volume Discrepancies and Wash Trading Concerns

The platform reportedly struggles with inflated trading metrics that misrepresent actual market activity. Industry participants estimate that over 80 percent of reported volume may not reflect genuine trades. 

Wash trading allows users to generate millions in volume without financial risk. One entity allegedly produced $500 million in volume over two months through coordinated trading. Users can reportedly generate $10 million in daily volume through risk-free strategies.

This practice undermines the platform’s credibility as a prediction market. The volume counting methodology fails to distinguish between authentic trades and manufactured activity. 

Market participants exploit this weakness to inflate their trading history. Such behavior creates false perceptions of liquidity and market depth. 

The problem extends beyond individual traders to organized operations targeting platform incentives.

The situation raises questions about token distribution plans and future incentives. An airdrop program could reward artificial volume rather than genuine participation. 

This dynamic discourages organic user engagement and attracts mercenary capital. Without proper safeguards, the platform risks becoming a playground for volume farmers. The valuation may not reflect sustainable business metrics given these concerns.

Market Integrity and Regulatory Challenges

Recent events expose vulnerabilities in market curation and resolution processes. Several markets face manipulation from coordinated groups affecting outcomes. 

Bad actors profit by influencing events that prediction markets track. ICO commitment markets prove particularly susceptible to coordinated manipulation schemes. Teams can easily manipulate token sale metrics to benefit their market positions.

Projects can trap substantial funds in prediction markets before token launches. They then artificially inflate participation metrics to trigger favorable market resolutions. 

Launch date markets face similar issues when teams adjust timelines strategically. These manipulations convert high-probability positions into total losses for unsuspecting traders. 

Pokemon card markets and other niche categories also experienced manipulation. Insider trading allegations surface regularly across multiple market categories.

The platform must implement stronger oversight to maintain legitimacy as regulatory attention intensifies. Gambling regulations exist for valid reasons that apply to prediction markets. 

Know Your Customer and anti-money laundering requirements may become mandatory. Future administrations may scrutinize operations more closely than current leadership. 

The platform needs improved curator systems and resolution mechanisms immediately. Without these changes, legal challenges and regulatory intervention become inevitable. 

Market manipulation across sectors damages trust and platform viability. Industry veterans believe the platform can survive if leadership addresses these concerns promptly.

The post Polymarket Valuation Raises Red Flags: Volume Manipulation and Market Integrity Concerns Surface appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
RedStone Logo
RedStone Price(RED)
$0.1955
$0.1955$0.1955
+2.62%
USD
RedStone (RED) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00