TLDR: Three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of JELLYJELLY’s total circulating supply Largest cluster holds 326M tokens worth $42.41M accumulatedTLDR: Three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of JELLYJELLY’s total circulating supply Largest cluster holds 326M tokens worth $42.41M accumulated

JELLYJELLY Rebounds 3x as Three Wallet Clusters Control 57% of Token Supply

TLDR:

  • Three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of JELLYJELLY’s total circulating supply
  • Largest cluster holds 326M tokens worth $42.41M accumulated primarily through Gate exchange platform
  • Token crashed 85% from $0.35 peak to current $0.07 level showing extreme volatility and risk factors
  • MACD shows bullish momentum building while DMI indicates weakening trend and market indecision ahead

JELLYJELLY has staged a remarkable recovery, climbing nearly three times from its bottom following an almost 90% decline from all-time highs. 

On-chain analysis reveals a concentrated supply structure where three coordinated wallet clusters control approximately 57% of total token circulation. 

This pattern mirrors previous observations in PIPPIN, suggesting insider coordination rather than organic market activity.

Coordinated Wallet Clusters Dominate Token Distribution

The largest cluster comprises top externally owned accounts that accumulated primarily through Gate exchange. 

These wallets collectively hold 326,226,487.04 JELLYJELLY tokens worth roughly $42.41 million. This group forms what analysts describe as the core supply backbone of the token’s market structure.

A second cluster consists of medium-sized accounts accumulating tokens from Bitget exchange. 

Together, these wallets control 141,078,919.70 JELLYJELLY valued at approximately $18.34 million. The coordinated accumulation pattern across different exchanges suggests planned activity rather than random retail participation.

The third cluster includes numerous smaller wallets sourcing tokens from Raydium decentralized exchange. 

Despite their size, these wallets display synchronized behavior that distinguishes them from typical retail traders. Combined, the three clusters hold 470,348,304.20 JELLYJELLY worth about $61.15 million.

Technical Indicators Show Mixed Signals Amid Extreme Volatility

Current trading data shows JELLYJELLY at $0.07022, representing a 36.10% decline from recent peaks. 

The token experienced a dramatic surge to approximately $0.35 in late October before crashing precipitously. Price action has since formed a consolidation base between $0.07 and $0.10.

The MACD indicator displays emerging bullish momentum as the blue line crosses above the signal line with green histogram bars appearing. 

Source: TradingView

This development suggests renewed buying interest despite the significant drawdown from peak levels. However, the Directional Movement Index shows ADX declining, indicating weakening overall trend strength.

Evening Trader Group’s analysis emphasizes that price movement depends primarily on whether controlling clusters choose to distribute their holdings. 

The DMI shows convergence between positive and negative directional indicators around the 30-50 range, reflecting market indecision. The 85% correction from peak levels underscores the extreme volatility characteristic of this asset class.

Market observers note the supply concentration creates conditions where price action depends more on insider decisions than on broader market fundamentals or narrative strength.

The post JELLYJELLY Rebounds 3x as Three Wallet Clusters Control 57% of Token Supply appeared first on Blockonomi.

Market Opportunity
jellyjelly Logo
jellyjelly Price(JELLYJELLY)
$0.07555
$0.07555$0.07555
-3.94%
USD
jellyjelly (JELLYJELLY) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness

The post Whales keep selling XRP despite ETF success — Data signals deeper weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. XRP ETFs have crossed $1 billion in assets
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/20 02:55
Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued

The post Foreigner’s Lou Gramm Revisits The Band’s Classic ‘4’ Album, Now Reissued appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. American-based rock band Foreigner performs onstage at the Rosemont Horizon, Rosemont, Illinois, November 8, 1981. Pictured are, from left, Mick Jones, on guitar, and vocalist Lou Gramm. (Photo by Paul Natkin/Getty Images) Getty Images Singer Lou Gramm has a vivid memory of recording the ballad “Waiting for a Girl Like You” at New York City’s Electric Lady Studio for his band Foreigner more than 40 years ago. Gramm was adding his vocals for the track in the control room on the other side of the glass when he noticed a beautiful woman walking through the door. “She sits on the sofa in front of the board,” he says. “She looked at me while I was singing. And every now and then, she had a little smile on her face. I’m not sure what that was, but it was driving me crazy. “And at the end of the song, when I’m singing the ad-libs and stuff like that, she gets up,” he continues. “She gives me a little smile and walks out of the room. And when the song ended, I would look up every now and then to see where Mick [Jones] and Mutt [Lange] were, and they were pushing buttons and turning knobs. They were not aware that she was even in the room. So when the song ended, I said, ‘Guys, who was that woman who walked in? She was beautiful.’ And they looked at each other, and they went, ‘What are you talking about? We didn’t see anything.’ But you know what? I think they put her up to it. Doesn’t that sound more like them?” “Waiting for a Girl Like You” became a massive hit in 1981 for Foreigner off their album 4, which peaked at number one on the Billboard chart for 10 weeks and…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 01:26
New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York Regulators Push Banks to Adopt Blockchain Analytics

New York’s top financial regulator urged banks to adopt blockchain analytics, signaling tighter oversight of crypto-linked risks. The move reflects regulators’ concern that traditional institutions face rising exposure to digital assets. While crypto-native firms already rely on monitoring tools, the Department of Financial Services now expects banks to use them to detect illicit activity. NYDFS Outlines Compliance Expectations The notice, issued on Wednesday by Superintendent Adrienne Harris, applies to all state-chartered banks and foreign branches. In its industry letter, the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) emphasized that blockchain analytics should be integrated into compliance programs according to each bank’s size, operations, and risk appetite. The regulator cautioned that crypto markets evolve quickly, requiring institutions to update frameworks regularly. “Emerging technologies introduce evolving threats that require enhanced monitoring tools,” the notice stated. It stressed the need for banks to prevent money laundering, sanctions violations, and other illicit finance linked to virtual currency transactions. To that end, the Department listed specific areas where blockchain analytics can be applied: Screening customer wallets with crypto exposure to assess risks. Verifying the origin of funds from virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Monitoring the ecosystem holistically to detect money laundering or sanctions exposure. Identifying and assessing counterparties, such as third-party VASPs. Evaluating expected versus actual transaction activity, including dollar thresholds. Weighing risks tied to new digital asset products before rollout. These examples highlight how institutions can tailor monitoring tools to strengthen their risk management frameworks. The guidance expands on NYDFS’s Virtual Currency-Related Activities (VCRA) framework, which has governed crypto oversight in the state since 2022. Regulators Signal Broader Impact Market observers say the notice is less about new rules and more about clarifying expectations. By formalizing the role of blockchain analytics in traditional finance, New York is reinforcing the idea that banks cannot treat crypto exposure as a niche concern. Analysts also believe the approach could ripple beyond New York. Federal agencies and regulators in other states may view the guidance as a blueprint for aligning banking oversight with the realities of digital asset adoption. For institutions, failure to adopt blockchain intelligence tools may invite regulatory scrutiny and undermine their ability to safeguard customer trust. With crypto now firmly embedded in global finance, New York’s stance suggests that blockchain analytics are no longer optional for banks — they are essential to protecting the financial system’s integrity.
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 08:49