SAN DIEGO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–$GAUZ #GAUZY—Robbins LLP informs stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquiredSAN DIEGO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–$GAUZ #GAUZY—Robbins LLP informs stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired

Investor Notice: Robbins LLP Informs Investors of Gauzy Ltd. Securities Class Action

SAN DIEGO–(BUSINESS WIRE)–$GAUZ #GAUZY—Robbins LLP informs stockholders that a class action was filed on behalf of all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Gauzy Ltd. (NASDAQ: GAUZ) securities between March 11, 2025 and November 13, 2025. Gauzy develops, manufactures, and supplies vision and light control technology products.

For more information, submit a form, email attorney Aaron Dumas, Jr., or give us a call at (800) 350-6003.

The Allegations: Robbins LLP is Investigating Allegations that Gauzy Ltd. (GAUZ) Misled Investors Regarding its Business Prospects

According to the complaint, the action alleges that during the class period, defendants failed to disclose to investors that: (1) three of the Company’s French subsidiaries lacked the financial means to meet their debts as they became due; (2) as a result, it was substantially likely insolvency proceedings would be commenced; and (3) as a result, it was substantially likely a potential default under the Company’s existing senior secured debt facilities would be triggered.

Plaintiff alleges that on November 14, 2025, Gauzy announced “the Commercial Court of Lyon, France, ordered the commencement of French law insolvency proceedings (‘Redressement Judiciaire’) relating to three subsidiaries of Gauzy located in France.” “Redressement Judiciaire are French insolvency proceedings aimed at preserving a company’s business and operations, maintaining employment and repaying creditors while allowing for a plan to enable its recovery.” The Company further revealed the “commencement of these insolvency proceedings in France constitutes a default under the Company’s existing senior secured debt facilities, which if not remedied could lead to an event of default.” Finally, the Company disclosed that it will not be releasing its financial results for the third quarter of 2025 on November 14, 2025, as previously planned, due to the proceedings. On this news, Gauzy’s share price fell $2.00 per share, or 49.8%, over two consecutive trading days, to close at $2.02 per share on November 17, 2025.

What Now: You may be eligible to participate in the class action against Gauzy Ltd. Shareholders who wish to serve as lead plaintiff for the class must submit their papers to the court by February 6, 2026. The lead plaintiff is a representative party who acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. You do not have to participate in the case to be eligible for a recovery. If you choose to take no action, you can remain an absent class member. For more information, click here.

All representation is on a contingency fee basis. Shareholders pay no fees or expenses.

About Robbins LLP: A recognized leader in shareholder rights litigation, the attorneys and staff of Robbins LLP have been dedicated to helping shareholders recover losses, improve corporate governance structures, and hold company executives accountable for their wrongdoing since 2002.

To be notified if a class action against Gauzy Ltd. settles or to receive free alerts when corporate executives engage in wrongdoing, sign up for Stock Watch today.

Attorney Advertising. Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

Contacts

Aaron Dumas, Jr.

Robbins LLP

5060 Shoreham Pl., Ste. 300

San Diego, CA 92122

[email protected]
(800) 350-6003

www.robbinsllp.com

Market Opportunity
VisionGame Logo
VisionGame Price(VISION)
$0.0000639
$0.0000639$0.0000639
-3.03%
USD
VisionGame (VISION) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Mastercard Partners With Polygon to Enable Crypto Payments for Consumers and Merchants

Mastercard Partners With Polygon to Enable Crypto Payments for Consumers and Merchants

Mastercard is expanding its Crypto Credential system to self-custody wallets through a partnership with Polygon and Mercuyo. The firm has broadened its presence
Share
Crypto News Flash2025/12/19 19:03
USD holds firm despite soft November CPI – ING

USD holds firm despite soft November CPI – ING

The post USD holds firm despite soft November CPI – ING appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The US Dollar (USD) is proving surprisingly resilient despite the release
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/19 19:08