The post Apollo bets against AI-vulnerable software firms appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Apollo Global Management, one of the world’s largest alternative The post Apollo bets against AI-vulnerable software firms appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Apollo Global Management, one of the world’s largest alternative

Apollo bets against AI-vulnerable software firms

Apollo Global Management, one of the world’s largest alternative asset managers, has made strategic bets against the debt of several enterprise software companies, citing growing concerns about how artificial intelligence could weaken parts of the tech sector.

Apollo took short positions on loans from software providers, including Internet Brands, SonicWall, and Perforce, because it feared that those institutions’ traditional business models might face earnings pressures as AI platforms automate functions once sold as high-margin software services.

However, the bets, which represented a fraction of its $700 billion credit portfolio and were maintained for much of the year, have now been closed.

Apollo warns that AI could harm the enterprise software industry

Apollo claims that AI poses risks to enterprise software, the largest target for private capital over the past decade. Other private lenders have also argued similarly, stating that software stands out as one of the most exposed sectors to AI, as the technology can automate many functions currently handled by coding tools, customer support software, and routine financial systems.

Nonetheless, Apollo’s short bets were just a small slice of its $700 billion credit book—less than 1%—according to a person familiar with the matter, with some of the funds used as hedges.

However, the software loans that Apollo bet against fell in value at times this year, but they’re all now trading above 80 cents on the dollar, halting concerns about near-term trouble. Though since the early 2010s, buyout specialists have borrowed hundreds of billions to acquire software firms, as lenders increasingly value recurring revenue and strong margins. 

Apollo still recognises that AI could benefit software companies, but its top executives have decided to cut exposure, preferring not to take directional industry positions. Marc Rowan, at a recent conference, even commented,  “I don’t know whether that’s going to be enterprise software, which could […] benefit or be destroyed by this. As a lender, I’m not sure I want to be there to find out.” 

Apollo is working to push software exposure across its credit portfolios below 10%.

Apollo has steadily reduced its exposure by lending to the sector throughout the year. At the start of 2025, roughly a fifth of Apollo’s private credit funds were tied to software groups, but that exposure has now been almost halved, Rowan said in closed-door investor meetings at a Goldman Sachs conference on Wednesday, a source in attendance said.

According to Rowan, the firm aims for software exposure across its credit funds to fall below 10% of net assets. It has been internally assessing which companies may be most vulnerable to AI disruption, and many other investors share similar concerns.

At an FT conference in October, Blackstone’s president, Jonathan Gray, warned that investors were underestimating the potential for disruption from technology, stating that he has challenged dealmakers to prominently quantify AI risks in their investment memos and identify specific companies as particularly vulnerable. 

Gray commented, “We’ve told our credit and equity teams: address AI on the first pages of your investment memos. If you think about rules-based businesses — legal, accounting, transaction and claims processing — this is going to be profound.” 

If you’re reading this, you’re already ahead. Stay there with our newsletter.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/apollo-bets-against-ai-vulnerable-firms/

Market Opportunity
null Logo
null Price(null)
--
----
USD
null (null) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Missouri Considers Bitcoin Reserve Fund using Donations

Missouri Considers Bitcoin Reserve Fund using Donations

The post Missouri Considers Bitcoin Reserve Fund using Donations appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Missouri legislators have taken a significant step by introducing
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/21 14:17
Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Tokyo’s Metaplanet Launches Miami Subsidiary to Amplify Bitcoin Income

Metaplanet Inc., the Japanese public company known for its bitcoin treasury, is launching a Miami subsidiary to run a dedicated derivatives and income strategy aimed at turning holdings into steady, U.S.-based cash flow. Japanese Bitcoin Treasury Player Metaplanet Opens Miami Outpost The new entity, Metaplanet Income Corp., sits under Metaplanet Holdings, Inc. and is based […]
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 00:32
FCA, crackdown on crypto

FCA, crackdown on crypto

The post FCA, crackdown on crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United Kingdom enters a decisive phase. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has initiated a consultation to set minimum standards on transparency, consumer protection, and digital custody, in order to strengthen market confidence and ensure safer operations for exchanges, wallets, and crypto service providers. The consultation was published on May 2, 2025, and opened a public discussion on operational responsibilities and safeguarding requirements for digital assets (CoinDesk). The goal is to make the rules clearer without hindering the sector’s evolution. According to the data collected by our regulatory monitoring team, in the first weeks following the publication, the feedback received from professionals and operators focused mainly on custody, incident reporting, and insurance requirements. Industry analysts note that many responses require technical clarifications on multi-sig, asset segregation, and recovery protocols, as well as proposals to scale obligations based on the size of the operator. FCA Consultation: What’s on the Table The consultation document clarifies how to apply rules inspired by traditional finance to the crypto perimeter, balancing innovation, market integrity, and user protection. In this context, the goal is to introduce minimum standards for all firms under the supervision of the FCA, an essential step for a more transparent and secure sector, with measurable benefits for users. The proposed pillars Obligations towards consumers: assessment on the extension of the Consumer Duty – a requirement that mandates companies to provide “good outcomes” – to crypto services, with outcomes for users that are traceable and verifiable. Operational resilience: introduction of continuity requirements, incident response plans, and periodic testing to ensure the operational stability of platforms even in adverse scenarios. Financial Crime Prevention: strengthening AML/CFT measures through more stringent transaction monitoring and structured counterpart checks. Custody and safeguarding: definition of operational methods for the segregation of client assets, secure…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 05:40