Developers are increasingly using "rollup" or "Layer Two" solutions to create new Web3 applications. The primary objective is to leverage the parent network's robust economic security, utilizing its substantial validator pool and security guarantees. The Web3 Foundation's Technical Education team has experimented with it with EduChain, which serves as a live demonstration network.Developers are increasingly using "rollup" or "Layer Two" solutions to create new Web3 applications. The primary objective is to leverage the parent network's robust economic security, utilizing its substantial validator pool and security guarantees. The Web3 Foundation's Technical Education team has experimented with it with EduChain, which serves as a live demonstration network.

Not Every Web3 Protocol Needs a Native Token

2025/12/11 06:52

When developing a new protocol, the default assumption is nearly always that a new native token must follow. Most blockchains and Web3 frameworks rely on cryptoeconomic systems comprising incentives and penalties to maintain protocol security and deter malicious actors.

\ However, deploying a new Web3 application as a "rollup" or "Layer Two" solution has been common in recent years. Whether implemented as a rollup on Ethereum, a parachain on Polkadot, or a subnet on Avalanche, the primary objective is to leverage the parent network's robust economic security, utilizing its substantial validator pool and security guarantees.

The Obstacles: Justification for a Separate Token

Currently, the technical challenge of building a blockchain has been significantly mitigated through the availability of numerous SDKs and frameworks. Tools such as the Polkadot SDK and Cosmos SDK allow developers to utilize templates and rapidly launch a functional network, complete with all the standard features one would expect from any standard Web3 protocol.

\ Despite these advancements, a major barrier remains: identity, namely, ensuring we have some semblance of sybil resistance.

\ ==We still need a way to ensure bad actors can’t utterly spam or harm our network, which is most of the main reasons why economic aspects of cryptoeconomic systems like Proof of Work or Proof of Stake exist.==

\ Tokenomics then becomes a subsequent concern: if a project's token model is flawed or poorly conceived, it can undermine the entire effort, regardless of the quality of the underlying technology.

\ The necessity of designing and securing an entirely separate cryptoeconomic network presents a considerable hurdle for developers and startups whose core mission is building a superior, more resilient application or infrastructure, not managing a monetary policy.

\ Fortunately, the landscape is evolving, providing a solution to this complexity.

The Solution: Utilizing the “Parent” Network's Token

If a new protocol builds upon an existing network and deploys as a rollup/Layer Two, they (should) inherently, well, inherit their security from the parent network.

\ This raises a critical question: why not simply use the parent network's native token for all operations? Everything is already set up; we just need to make sure that we can safely perform checks and balances when transferring to and from the parent network. ==In the future, it might be possible to launch a rollup without a token at all, if we solve the Sybil problem, and assuming we have a parent network that provides security for our rollup/service.==

\ Polkadot permits the launch of a “tokenless” parachain. The parachain can instead use the Layer One's token (such as DOT on Polkadot) to facilitate all operations, including transaction fees and security mechanisms.

\ This approach frees up the team to concentrate on ==building solutions and core application logic==. In other words, you focus more on getting your protocol running so you can build your resilient application/infrastructure rather than being bogged down by token mechanics.

A Live Example: EduChain

This concept is not merely theoretical. The Web3 Foundation's Technical Education team (of which I am a part of!) has experimented with it with EduChain, which serves as a live demonstration of this tokenless configuration. It utilizes the parent network’s token, specifically the PAS token on the Paseo testnet, as its functional currency.

\ The EduChain configuration operates via a reserve-backed transfer using XCM, which functions as follows:

\

  • Zero initial supply: the chain commences with a zero total supply of its own potential token. To fund a network account, a cross-chain transfer via XCM must be initiated from the parent network (Paseo).

  • The reserve and the sovereign account: The parachain designates a system parachain (such as the Paseo Asset Hub) as a reserve for the parent token (PAS). Upon the parachain's creation, a specialized account, known as a sovereign account, is automatically generated on the parent chain exclusively for the parachain.

  • Transferring PAS:

  • When a user sends PAS from their account on the parent chain (Paseo) to the parachain (EduChain), the PAS is deposited into the parachain's sovereign account on the parent chain, where it functions as the reserve.

  • Simultaneously, a new, local asset representing PAS is minted on the parachain and credited to the user's account there.

  • When a user sends this local asset back to the parent chain, the local asset is burned on the parachain, and the corresponding PAS amount is unlocked and transferred from the sovereign account back to the beneficiary's account on the parent chain.

    \

This XCM mechanism ensures that every unit of PAS on the parachain is fully backed 1:1 by actual PAS held in a secure reserve on the parent network, thereby eliminating the necessity for a distinct, project-specific token.

\ As a general note, a parachain controls its own local representation of an asset and could, in principle, change those balances according to its own governance. However, Asset Hub — as the reserve location — maintains the canonical reserve‑backed accounting for that asset across the network, and parachains are expected to use XCM instructions via Asset Hub so that this accounting remains correct and consistent.

\ For comprehensive details on EduChain and its operational mechanics, documentation is available at: https://web3educhain.xyz/

Conclusion

This article aimed to highlight the significant potential of delegating the economic and security concerns of a rollup or Layer Two to the parent network itself. By employing reserve-backed XCM transfers, a project can completely circumvent the substantial difficulties associated with launching a new Web3 protocol, allowing the team to dedicate its full effort to building a superior application and addressing real-world problems.

\ Individuals interested in implementing this solution can explore launching a parachain on Paseo, as well as the EduChain repo for more information:

\

  • Parachain Zero To Hero Tutorials
  • Web3 Educhain

\

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

The post UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The UK and US are reportedly preparing to deepen cooperation on digital assets, with Britain looking to copy the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly stance in a bid to boost innovation.  UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed on Tuesday how the two nations could strengthen their coordination on crypto, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter.  The discussions also involved representatives from crypto companies, including Coinbase, Circle Internet Group and Ripple, with executives from the Bank of America, Barclays and Citi also attending, according to the report. The agreement was made “last-minute” after crypto advocacy groups urged the UK government on Thursday to adopt a more open stance toward the industry, claiming its cautious approach to the sector has left the country lagging in innovation and policy.  Source: Rachel Reeves Deal to include stablecoins, look to unlock adoption Any deal between the countries is likely to include stablecoins, the Financial Times reported, an area of crypto that US President Donald Trump made a policy priority and in which his family has significant business interests. The Financial Times reported on Monday that UK crypto advocacy groups also slammed the Bank of England’s proposal to limit individual stablecoin holdings to between 10,000 British pounds ($13,650) and 20,000 pounds ($27,300), claiming it would be difficult and expensive to implement. UK banks appear to have slowed adoption too, with around 40% of 2,000 recently surveyed crypto investors saying that their banks had either blocked or delayed a payment to a crypto provider.  Many of these actions have been linked to concerns over volatility, fraud and scams. The UK has made some progress on crypto regulation recently, proposing a framework in May that would see crypto exchanges, dealers, and agents treated similarly to traditional finance firms, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:21
Why is Bitcoin (BTC) Trading Lower Today?

Why is Bitcoin (BTC) Trading Lower Today?

The post Why is Bitcoin (BTC) Trading Lower Today? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin BTC$90,457.05, the leading cryptocurrency by market value, is down following the overnight Fed rate cut. The reason likely lies in the Fed’s messaging, which has made traders less excited about future easing. The Fed on Wednesday cut the benchmark interest rate by 25 basis points to 3.25% as expected and announced it will begin purchasing short-term Treasury bills to manage liquidity in the banking system. Yet, BTC traded below $90,000 at press time, representing a 2.4% decline since early Asian trading hours, according to CoinDesk data. Ether was down 4% at $3,190, with the CoinDesk 20 Index down over 4%. The risk-off action is likely due to growing signs of internal Fed divisions on balancing inflation control against employment goals, coupled with signals of a more challenging path for future rate cuts. Two members voted for no change on Wednesday, but individual forecasts revealed that six FOMC members felt that a cut wasn’t “appropriate.” Besides, the central bank suggested just one more rate cut in 2026, disappointing expectations for two to three rate cuts. “The Fed is divided, and the market has no real insight into the future path of rates from now until May 2026, when Chairman Jerome Powell will be replaced. The replacement of Powell with a Trump loyalist (who will push to lower rates aggressively) is likely the most reliable signal for rates. Until then, however, there are still 6 months to go,” Greg Magadini, director of derivatives at Amberdata, told CoinDesk. He added that the most likely occurrence as of now is a needed “deleveraging” or down-market” to convince the Fed of lower rates decidedly. Shiliang Tang, managing partner of Monarq Asset Management, said BTC is following the stock market lower. “Crypto markets initially spiked on the news but have steadily moved lower since, in conjunction with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/11 17:27