We’ll demonstrate an end-to-end data extraction pipeline engineered for maximum automation, reproducibility, and technical rigor. Our goal is to transform unstructured PDF documentation into precise, structured, and queryable tables. We use the open-source [CocoIndex framework] and state-of-the-art LLMs (like Meta’s Llama 3) managed locally by Ollama.We’ll demonstrate an end-to-end data extraction pipeline engineered for maximum automation, reproducibility, and technical rigor. Our goal is to transform unstructured PDF documentation into precise, structured, and queryable tables. We use the open-source [CocoIndex framework] and state-of-the-art LLMs (like Meta’s Llama 3) managed locally by Ollama.

PDFs to Intelligence: How To Auto-Extract Python Manual Knowledge Recursively Using Ollama, LLMs

2025/12/06 23:00

We’ll demonstrate an end-to-end data extraction pipeline engineered for maximum automation, reproducibility, and technical rigor. Our goal is to transform unstructured PDF documentation—like the official Python manuals—into precise, structured, and queryable tables, using the open-source CocoIndex framework and state-of-the-art LLMs (like Meta’s Llama 3) managed locally by Ollama.

\ If this tutorial is helpful, star the repo! https://github.com/cocoindex-io/cocoindex

Flow Overview

\

  1. Document Parsing: For each PDF file in your collection, the pipeline automatically converts binary content to markdown using a custom, modular parser. This enables flexible ingestion of diverse manual formats—using CPU or GPU accelerators for scalable performance.

    \

  2. Structured Data Extraction: Utilizing built-in ExtractByLlm functions from CocoIndex, each markdown is processed by an LLM (served locally via Ollama, Gemini, or LiteLLM), yielding a fully-typed Python dataclass (ModuleInfo) with classes, methods, arguments, and doc summaries.

    \

  3. Post-Processing & Summarization: The flow applies a custom summarization operator, counting and annotating structural aspects of the extracted module, enabling instant insights and downstream analytics.

    \

  4. Data Collection & Export: All structured outputs are collected by the indexed PostgreSQL backend, supporting fast analytical queries and robust reporting for every processed manual.

    \

This highly extensible pipeline pattern supports new formats, more complex schemas, or alternative LLM providers with minimal friction, leveraging CocoIndex’s comprehensive type and function system.

Prerequisites

  • If you don't have Postgres installed, please refer to the installation guide.
  • Download and install Ollama. Pull your favorite LLM models by:

ollama pull llama3.2

Add Source

Let's add Python docs as a source.

@cocoindex.flow_def(name="ManualExtraction") def manual_extraction_flow( flow_builder: cocoindex.FlowBuilder, data_scope: cocoindex.DataScope ): """ Define an example flow that extracts manual information from a Markdown. """ data_scope["documents"] = flow_builder.add_source( cocoindex.sources.LocalFile(path="manuals", binary=True) ) modules_index = data_scope.add_collector()

flow_builder.add_source will create a table with the following subfields:

  • filename (key, type: str): the filename of the file, e.g. dir1/file1.md
  • content (type: str if binary is False, otherwise bytes): the content of the file

Why This Matters for Automation and Scale

By abstracting file input at this level, you future-proof the flow for ingestion of extremely diverse documentation formats. CocoIndex ensures that each file is indexed, versioned, and queryable, while separating content from structure. This design lays the foundation for highly modular, repeatable end-to-end data pipelines in any technical archiving or document understanding project.

\ Advanced users can extend this source to pull from S3 buckets, GitHub releases, or enterprise drives—just by swapping the source operator and keeping the rest of the flow logic unchanged.

LocalFile

Parse Markdown

To do this, we can plug in a custom function to convert PDF to markdown. There are so many different parsers commercially and open source available; you can bring your own parser here.

class PdfToMarkdown(cocoindex.op.FunctionSpec): """Convert a PDF to markdown.""" @cocoindex.op.executor_class(gpu=True, cache=True, behavior_version=1) class PdfToMarkdownExecutor: """Executor for PdfToMarkdown.""" spec: PdfToMarkdown _converter: PdfConverter def prepare(self): config_parser = ConfigParser({}) self._converter = PdfConverter( create_model_dict(), config=config_parser.generate_config_dict() ) def __call__(self, content: bytes) -> str: with tempfile.NamedTemporaryFile(delete=True, suffix=".pdf") as temp_file: temp_file.write(content) temp_file.flush() text, _, _ = text_from_rendered(self._converter(temp_file.name)) return text

\ You may wonder why we want to define a spec + executor (instead of using a standalone function) here. The main reason is that there's some heavy preparation work (initialize the parser) that needs to be done before being ready to process real data.

Custom Function

\ Plug in the function to the flow.

with data_scope["documents"].row() as doc: doc["markdown"] = doc["content"].transform(PdfToMarkdown())

It transforms each document to Markdown.

  • Leveraging a custom parser within the CocoIndex flow, each binary PDF file is ingested as-is, preserving original fidelity. The use of binary=True ensures compatibility with both text and image or scanned PDFs.
  • The parser is modularized via a FunctionSpec/executor class design pattern, where resource-intensive model loading (Tesseract, PyMuPDF, or commercial OCR) is performed in initialization, and PDF -> markdown logic is encapsulated in an efficient, deterministic transformation for reproducibility.
  • GPU acceleration and caching are seamlessly supported for high-throughput settings.

\

  • The choice of the executor class and not a simple function allows:
  • Heavyweight resource preloading (OCR models, custom dictionaries, GPU contexts)
  • Distributed/cache-aware deployments where workers share model memory
  • Hot-swapping parsers (for testing Tesseract vs. PyMuPDF) without changing flow logic
  • Transformation results are always markdown, which is LLM-friendly and carries hierarchical semantic cues for reliable extraction.

Extract Structured Data From Markdown Files

Define Schema

Let's define the schema ModuleInfo using Python dataclasses, and we can pass it to the LLM to extract the structured data. It's easy to do this with CocoIndex.

@dataclasses.dataclass class ArgInfo: """Information about an argument of a method.""" name: str description: str @dataclasses.dataclass class MethodInfo: """Information about a method.""" name: str args: cocoindex.typing.List[ArgInfo] description: str @dataclasses.dataclass class ClassInfo: """Information about a class.""" name: str description: str methods: cocoindex.typing.List[MethodInfo] @dataclasses.dataclass class ModuleInfo: """Information about a Python module.""" title: str description: str ## Overview: Extracting Structured Data from Python Manuals with Ollama and CocoIndex In this section, we’ll demonstrate an end-to-end data extraction pipeline engineered for maximum automation, reproducibility, and technical rigor. Our goal is to transform unstructured PDF documentation—like the official Python manuals—into precise, structured, and queryable tables, using the open-source CocoIndex framework and state-of-the-art LLMs (like Meta’s Llama 3) managed locally by Ollama. ### Flow Architecture 1. **Document Parsing**: For each PDF file in your collection, the pipeline automatically converts binary content to markdown using a custom, modular parser. This enables flexible ingestion of diverse manual formats—using CPU or GPU accelerators for scalable performance. 2. **Structured Data Extraction**: Utilizing built-in ExtractByLlm functions from CocoIndex, each markdown is processed by an LLM (served locally via Ollama, Gemini, or LiteLLM), yielding a fully-typed Python dataclass (ModuleInfo) with classes, methods, arguments, and doc summaries. 3. **Post-Processing & Summarization**: The flow applies a custom summarization operator, counting and annotating structural aspects of the extracted module, enabling instant insights and down-stream analytics. 4. **Data Collection & Export**: All structured outputs are collected by the indexed PostgreSQL backend, supporting fast analytical queries and robust reporting for every processed manual. This highly extensible pipeline pattern supports new formats, more complex schemas, or alternative LLM providers with minimal friction, leveraging CocoIndex’s comprehensive type and function system. classes: cocoindex.typing.List[ClassInfo] methods: cocoindex.typing.List[MethodInfo]

\

  1. Once converted to markdown, each document is piped into the CocoIndex ExtractByLlm operator, which takes the markdown as a rich, contextually annotated prompt.
  • The LLM (e.g., Llama 3 served by Ollama on your own hardware) is instructed to extract information based on a Python dataclass schema, ensuring type safety and standardization across runs.
  • This design decouples the LLM provider from the downstream flow, so you can swap out Llama for Gemini or OpenAI, and standardize output regardless of LLM vendor differences.

Extract Structured Data

CocoIndex provides built-in functions (e.g., ExtractByLlm) that process data using LLM. This example uses Ollama.

with data_scope["documents"].row() as doc: doc["module_info"] = doc["content"].transform( cocoindex.functions.ExtractByLlm( llm_spec=cocoindex.LlmSpec( api_type=cocoindex.LlmApiType.OLLAMA, # See the full list of models: https://ollama.com/library model="llama3.2" ), output_type=ModuleInfo, instruction="Please extract Python module information from the manual."))

ExtractByLlm

\

  • Use Python dataclasses (ModuleInfoClassInfo, etc.) so that output is always typed and minimally ambiguous. LLM instructions (as a prompt) reinforce extraction fidelity.
  • This approach allows easy validation (with unit/integration tests), strong contract-driven extraction, and automated upstream/downstream compatibility checks.

Add Summarization to Module Info

Using CocoIndex as a framework, you can easily add any transformation to the data and collect it as part of the data index. Let's add a simple summary to each module - like the number of classes and methods, using a simple Python function.

Define Schema

@dataclasses.dataclass class ModuleSummary: """Summary info about a Python module.""" num_classes: int num_methods: int

A simple custom function to summarize the data.

@cocoindex.op.function() def summarize_module(module_info: ModuleInfo) -> ModuleSummary: """Summarize a Python module.""" return ModuleSummary( num_classes=len(module_info.classes), num_methods=len(module_info.methods), )

\

  • By injecting custom functions (plain Python or accelerated), you can perform inline analytics—such as counting modules, classes, methods—right after LLM extraction, embedding summaries or metadata into the data index itself for instant observability and pipeline health checks.
  • This approach allows you to combine weak supervision, LLM output, and classic post-processing in a unified, traceable DAG.

\ In this way,

  • Summary transformation functions provide instant metrics—how many classes, methods, etc.—that can be further used for monitoring, reporting, or pipeline debugging.
  • All summary logic can be written in pure Python or tuned for custom use: e.g., filtering on class count, flagging missing docstrings, or computing code complexity at extraction time.

Plug the function into the flow.

with data_scope["documents"].row() as doc: # ... after the extraction doc["module_summary"] = doc["module_info"].transform(summarize_module)

Custom Function

Collect the Data

After the extraction, we need to cherry-pick anything we like from the output using the collect function from the collector of a data scope defined above.

modules_index.collect( filename=doc["filename"], module_info=doc["module_info"], )

\ Finally, let's export the extracted data to a table.

modules_index.export( "modules", cocoindex.storages.Postgres(table_name="modules_info"), primary_key_fields=["filename"], )

\

  • All results are indexed and versioned in a Postgres backend, supporting direct SQL analytics, audit trails, or integrations with visualization and BI tools.
  • CocoIndex’s collectors enable cherry-picking and normalization of outputs, e.g., only capturing core module info or including full/partial markdown content for additional review.

Query and Test Your Index

Run the following command to set up and update the index.

cocoindex update -L main

\ You'll see the index updates state in the terminal.

\ After the index is built, you have a table with the name modules_info. You can query it at any time, e.g., start a Postgres shell:

psql postgres://cocoindex:cocoindex@localhost/cocoindex

\ And run the SQL query:

SELECT filename, module_info->'title' AS title, module_summary FROM modules_info;

CocoInsight

CocoInsight is a really cool tool to help you understand your data pipeline and data index. It is in Early Access now (Free).

cocoindex server -ci main

\ CocoInsight dashboard is here https://cocoindex.io/cocoinsight. It connects to your local CocoIndex server with zero data retention.

\ This sort of advanced doc extraction pipeline—spanning OCR, LLM-driven type-safe extraction, post-processing, indexing, and visualization—is a blueprint for modern, scalable technical knowledge engineering initiatives.

\ For production, continuous integration and snapshot versioning are recommended, ensuring the entire pipeline is reproducible, observable, and adaptable to new standards or models.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Vitalik Buterin Proposes Ethereum Gas Futures Market for Long-Term Fee Predictability

Vitalik Buterin Proposes Ethereum Gas Futures Market for Long-Term Fee Predictability

The post Vitalik Buterin Proposes Ethereum Gas Futures Market for Long-Term Fee Predictability appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Vitalik Buterin proposes an on-chain futures market for Ethereum gas, allowing users to pre-buy and lock in fees before potential price surges. This mechanism would provide long-term predictability for BASEFEE, helping developers and businesses plan transactions amid network volatility. Buterin’s vision introduces futures trading for gas, securing costs in advance for future Ethereum transactions. This system generates market-driven signals for BASEFEE evolution, reducing uncertainty in fee planning. Early projects like Oiler have tested gas derivatives, but a mature market is needed; Ethereum’s BASEFEE has fluctuated up to 200% in past cycles, per network data. Ethereum gas futures: Vitalik Buterin’s plan to pre-buy fees and stabilize costs. Discover how this on-chain market could transform transaction predictability—explore Ethereum’s future now! What is Vitalik Buterin’s Proposal for Pre-Buying Ethereum Gas? Vitalik Buterin, Ethereum’s co-founder, is advocating for an on-chain futures market that enables users to pre-buy gas at fixed prices, addressing the network’s long-standing issue of unpredictable transaction fees. This approach shifts focus from immediate cost reductions to long-term fee stability, allowing individuals and organizations to hedge against future spikes in BASEFEE. By creating a dedicated trading platform within Ethereum, Buterin aims to make gas pricing more transparent and manageable, fostering greater confidence in the ecosystem’s economic model. How Would an Ethereum Gas Futures Market Function? Ethereum’s current gas fee system relies on dynamic pricing through the EIP-1559 mechanism, where BASEFEE adjusts based on network congestion, often leading to volatility that can surge by over 150% during peak periods, as observed in historical data from the Ethereum Foundation’s reports. Buterin’s proposed futures market would operate as a decentralized exchange for gas contracts, where traders buy and sell claims to future gas units at agreed-upon prices. This market-driven mechanism would aggregate collective expectations, providing real-time signals on anticipated BASEFEE trends—such as potential increases tied…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 18:31
UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach

The post UK Looks to US to Adopt More Crypto-Friendly Approach appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The UK and US are reportedly preparing to deepen cooperation on digital assets, with Britain looking to copy the Trump administration’s crypto-friendly stance in a bid to boost innovation.  UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent discussed on Tuesday how the two nations could strengthen their coordination on crypto, the Financial Times reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the matter.  The discussions also involved representatives from crypto companies, including Coinbase, Circle Internet Group and Ripple, with executives from the Bank of America, Barclays and Citi also attending, according to the report. The agreement was made “last-minute” after crypto advocacy groups urged the UK government on Thursday to adopt a more open stance toward the industry, claiming its cautious approach to the sector has left the country lagging in innovation and policy.  Source: Rachel Reeves Deal to include stablecoins, look to unlock adoption Any deal between the countries is likely to include stablecoins, the Financial Times reported, an area of crypto that US President Donald Trump made a policy priority and in which his family has significant business interests. The Financial Times reported on Monday that UK crypto advocacy groups also slammed the Bank of England’s proposal to limit individual stablecoin holdings to between 10,000 British pounds ($13,650) and 20,000 pounds ($27,300), claiming it would be difficult and expensive to implement. UK banks appear to have slowed adoption too, with around 40% of 2,000 recently surveyed crypto investors saying that their banks had either blocked or delayed a payment to a crypto provider.  Many of these actions have been linked to concerns over volatility, fraud and scams. The UK has made some progress on crypto regulation recently, proposing a framework in May that would see crypto exchanges, dealers, and agents treated similarly to traditional finance firms, with…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:21