The post For Good’ Connects To ‘The Wizard Of Oz’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) in Wicked: For Good Universal Pictures Wicked: For Good is heavily tied to The Wizard of Oz (1939), to the point where the original film is worth watching first. Wicked: For Good completes the story of Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) that started in Wicked, cementing her reputation as the Wicked Witch of the West, while Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) learns to live up to her name. Do You Need To Watch ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Before ‘Wicked: For Good’? It certainly helps—Wicked: For Good assumes that viewers are very familiar with the events of The Wizard of Oz. If you’ve never seen the original film, you might struggle to understand certain parts of the story. Thankfully, The Wizard of Oz still holds up—there’s a reason the classic musical is viewed as one of the most iconic films to ever emerge from Hollywood. Actors Ray Bolger (1904-1987), Jack Haley (1897-1979), Judy Garland (1922-1969) and Bert Lahr (1895-1967) in costume on the yellow brick road in a scene from the film ‘The Wizard of Oz’, 1939. (Photo by Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images) Getty Images The late, great director David Lynch was famously obsessed with the film, and its influence can still be felt in stories told today. The Wizard of Oz is based on L. Frank Baum’s 1900 book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. With his book, Baum aimed to create an original American fairytale, and deliberately wrote simple characters, some defined by a single trait—Dorothy is good and the Wicked Witch is evil—the 1939 film maintained this dynamic (Glinda was always a side-character in both). Wicked and Wicked: For Good are both based on the second highest-grossing Broadway musical of all time, which is an adaptation of Gregory Maguire’s 2000 novel, Wicked. Maguire’s novel aimed to… The post For Good’ Connects To ‘The Wizard Of Oz’ appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) in Wicked: For Good Universal Pictures Wicked: For Good is heavily tied to The Wizard of Oz (1939), to the point where the original film is worth watching first. Wicked: For Good completes the story of Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) that started in Wicked, cementing her reputation as the Wicked Witch of the West, while Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) learns to live up to her name. Do You Need To Watch ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Before ‘Wicked: For Good’? It certainly helps—Wicked: For Good assumes that viewers are very familiar with the events of The Wizard of Oz. If you’ve never seen the original film, you might struggle to understand certain parts of the story. Thankfully, The Wizard of Oz still holds up—there’s a reason the classic musical is viewed as one of the most iconic films to ever emerge from Hollywood. Actors Ray Bolger (1904-1987), Jack Haley (1897-1979), Judy Garland (1922-1969) and Bert Lahr (1895-1967) in costume on the yellow brick road in a scene from the film ‘The Wizard of Oz’, 1939. (Photo by Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images) Getty Images The late, great director David Lynch was famously obsessed with the film, and its influence can still be felt in stories told today. The Wizard of Oz is based on L. Frank Baum’s 1900 book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz. With his book, Baum aimed to create an original American fairytale, and deliberately wrote simple characters, some defined by a single trait—Dorothy is good and the Wicked Witch is evil—the 1939 film maintained this dynamic (Glinda was always a side-character in both). Wicked and Wicked: For Good are both based on the second highest-grossing Broadway musical of all time, which is an adaptation of Gregory Maguire’s 2000 novel, Wicked. Maguire’s novel aimed to…

For Good’ Connects To ‘The Wizard Of Oz’

2025/11/23 08:11

Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) in Wicked: For Good

Universal Pictures

Wicked: For Good is heavily tied to The Wizard of Oz (1939), to the point where the original film is worth watching first.

Wicked: For Good completes the story of Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo) that started in Wicked, cementing her reputation as the Wicked Witch of the West, while Glinda the Good (Ariana Grande) learns to live up to her name.

Do You Need To Watch ‘The Wizard of Oz’ Before ‘Wicked: For Good’?

It certainly helps—Wicked: For Good assumes that viewers are very familiar with the events of The Wizard of Oz.

If you’ve never seen the original film, you might struggle to understand certain parts of the story.

Thankfully, The Wizard of Oz still holds up—there’s a reason the classic musical is viewed as one of the most iconic films to ever emerge from Hollywood.

Actors Ray Bolger (1904-1987), Jack Haley (1897-1979), Judy Garland (1922-1969) and Bert Lahr (1895-1967) in costume on the yellow brick road in a scene from the film ‘The Wizard of Oz’, 1939. (Photo by Silver Screen Collection/Getty Images)

Getty Images

The late, great director David Lynch was famously obsessed with the film, and its influence can still be felt in stories told today.

The Wizard of Oz is based on L. Frank Baum’s 1900 book The Wonderful Wizard of Oz.

With his book, Baum aimed to create an original American fairytale, and deliberately wrote simple characters, some defined by a single trait—Dorothy is good and the Wicked Witch is evil—the 1939 film maintained this dynamic (Glinda was always a side-character in both).

Wicked and Wicked: For Good are both based on the second highest-grossing Broadway musical of all time, which is an adaptation of Gregory Maguire’s 2000 novel, Wicked.

Maguire’s novel aimed to deconstruct the events of The Wizard of Oz, asking how the Wicked Witch came to be viewed as a one-dimensional villain.

Maguire borrowed elements from the Wizard of Oz book and film, creating a morally ambiguous prequel that was never meant to be canon.

Wicked: For Good is a retelling of a familiar tale, with a twist.

What Is The Plot Of The Original ‘Wizard Of Oz’?

The 1939 film sees Dorothy forced out of Kansas after a hurricane lifts her house and drops it into the magical land of Oz.

Dorothy’s house accidently crushes the Wicked Witch of the East, oppressor of the Munchkins, and as a reward, Glinda the Good gives Dorothy the witch’s magical ruby slippers (the slippers appear as silver in Wicked: For Good, which is the color from the original novel).

Dorothy sets off on the Yellow Brick Road to see the Wizard of Oz and find a way home, but makes three friends along the way—the Scarecrow, Tin Man and Cowardly Lion.

The trio all feel that they are lacking something, with Scarecrow seeking a brain, the Tin Man a heart, and the Cowardly Lion, courage.

The Wizard tasks the three with slaying the Wicked Witch of the West. They manage to do so by accident—the Wicked Witch sets fire to Scarecrow and Dorothy throws water to put it out, melting the Wicked Witch into a puddle.

Returning to the Emerald City for their reward, the three uncover the truth about the Wizard—he’s just an ordinary man from Dorothy’s world.

However, the Wizard proves to be a trickster with a heart of gold, giving the Scarecrow, Tin Man and Lion trinkets which fool them into uncovering the positive traits they had all along.

The Wizard plans to return Dorothy to Kansas with a hot air balloon, but he is lifted into the air without Dorothy after Toto runs away.

Glinda the Good returns to reassure Dorothy that she, just like her companions, had the solution all along, and Dorothy uses the magical slippers to return home.

The film frames the entire trip as a dream, contrary to the novel.

Wicked: For Good inserts a more complex narrative under the surface of Dorothy’s journey.

How ‘Wicked: for Good’ Connects To ‘The Wizard Of Oz’

Wicked: For Good creates origin stories for Dorothy’s three companions, and even explains the hurricane that brought her to Kansas as the work of Madame Morrible (Michelle Yeoh).

Warning—spoilers ahead.

The Tin Man

Elphaba visits her disabled sister, Nessarose (Marissa Bode), who rules Munchkinland, and enchants Nessa’s silver slippers as a good deed, enabling her sister to fly.

This backfires after Nessa’s lover, Boq (Ethan Slater) storms out, intimidated by the use of magic.

Nessa then uses the Grimmerie, the powerful spellbook of Oz, to enchant Boq’s heart and make him stay with her forever.

Nessa botches the spell and shrinks his heart, forcing Elphaba to create a desperate curse to save Boq, transforming him into a metal man with no heart—the Tin Man.

The original novel gives the Tin Man a grisly, somewhat similar origin. He falls in love with a servant of the Wicked Witch of the East, and the witch blocks their marriage by cursing his axe, making it cut off a body part with each swing. Over time, his body is replaced piece by piece.

The 1939 film does not give the Tin Man an origin, but he does mention that “the tinsmith forgot to give me a heart,” suggesting that he was built.

Dorothy’s Arrival, And The Scarecrow’s Origin

We only see Dorothy from the back in Wicked: For Good—the protagonist of The Wizard of Oz is flipped into a mysterious agent of chaos who traverses through the land, making huge changes without ever knowing the truth of her actions.

Madame Morrible deliberately creates the tornado and drops Dorothy’s house onto Nessarose, murdering her and leading to Glinda giving the silver slippers to Dorothy.

This enrages Elphaba, resulting in her and Glinda having a physical fight, broken up by Fiyero (Jonathan Bailey), Glinda’s ex-husband and Elphaba’s true love.

Fiyero sacrifices himself to Oz’s guards, allowing Elphaba to escape.

Fiyero is beaten almost to death by the guards and hung on a wooden cross, and again, in desperation, Elphaba uses her magic to protect Fiyero from all bodily harm, transforming him into a Scarecrow.

In the novel, the Scarecrow is just a scarecrow, and describes himself coming into consciousness as a Munchkin farmer creates his body.

The 1939 film does not bother with an origin—the Scarecrow’s romantic backstory with Glinda and Elphaba is solely a Wicked invention.

The Cowardly Lion

The Cowardly Lion (Colman Domingo) first appears as a cub in Wicked, protected by Elphaba. In Wicked: For Good, this good deed is reframed as a disservice, with Elphaba blamed for the lion growing up to be a coward.

It’s unclear if the Cowardly Lion actually believes this, or is too scared to speak up.

In the novel, there is no origin story, nor is the Cowardly Lion ever really afraid. In fact, the novel makes it clear that all three companions excel in the exact qualities they believe they lack, but the 1939 film depicts the Cowardly Lion as very cowardly indeed.

Oz’s repression of the talking animal population is also an invention of Wicked, reframing the Wizard of Oz into a wicked trickster rather than benevolent liar.

The Wizard of Oz

Wicked: For Good depicts the Wizard as a villain and ruthless tyrant, who represses the animal population as a means to seize control.

The twist ending of For Good reveals that the Wizard is actually Elphaba’s father, who “seduced” Elphaba’s mother using a magic potion that resulted in her green skin.

The Wizard is surprised to hear this, and leaves the Land of Oz in shame after Glinda tells him the truth.

The original film and novel take a much more sympathetic approach to the Wizard—he’s a shameless huckster who takes advantage of the naivety of Oz’s citizens, but he’s also a good leader and an inspiration to many.

In later novels (Baum wrote several sequels), the Wizard returns to the story, and his role in Oz’s history is revealed to be more sinister than it first seems, as he displaced the royal family and placed himself as the ruler of the Land.

However, he is never depicted as an outright villain—he’s a kindly trickster, a man who followed his ambition as far as it would go, lying every step of the way.

Wicked: For Good ends with Elphaba reunited with Fiyero, fleeing the Land of Oz by crossing a vast, uninhabited desert. This desert doesn’t appear in The Wizard of Oz, but it is part of Baum’s books, and is known as the Deadly Desert.

The Deadly Desert surrounds Oz, and is covered with sand that kills all those who touch it, which is clearly not part of Wicked canon.

However, the Deadly Desert can be seen in the surprisingly dark sequel to The Wizard of Oz, the 1985 film Return to Oz. If you’ve watched both Wicked films and The Wizard of Oz, give Return to Oz a watch (it’s available to stream on Disney+).

Like Wicked: For Good, Return to Oz is a different take on Baum’s world, and is more faithful to the books than the 1939 film.

MORE FROM FORBES

ForbesThe Tragic Ending Of ‘Wicked,’ ExplainedForbes‘Wicked’—Ariana Grande And Cynthia Erivo’s ‘Holding Space’ Meme, ExplainedForbesThe AI-Altered ‘Wizard Of Oz’ Controversy, ExplainedForbesDisney Fans Want To Know—What’s The Point Of Live-Action ‘Moana’?

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2025/11/22/how-wicked-for-good-connects-to-the-wizard-of-oz/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Near $2 as ETFs Smash $1B AUM — Institutional Money Quietly Takes Over

XRP Near $2 as ETFs Smash $1B AUM — Institutional Money Quietly Takes Over

XRP trades near $2.04 after climbing more than 12% in the last month, yet the token struggles to reclaim strong momentum. The asset slipped through the past week and lost close to 8% while traders weighed a rare combination of institutional strength and short-term weakness. With a market capitalization near $125 billion and daily volume above $3.3 billion, XRP keeps its position as one of the most liquid crypto assets. The market now watches the psychological $2 support level as heavy inflows clash ih rising short exposure and fading retail conviction.Sentiment Breakdown Creates a Contrarian SetupMarket sentiment around XRP sits inside one of the deepest fear zones since October. Santiment reports that sentiment prints the same level of panic that preceded a sharp twenty-two percent rebound on November 21. RSI sits near 45 and the SAR indicator keeps flipping into bearish territory. Source: XTraders feel trapped between disbelief and fatigue after a two-month decline of thirty-one percent. The present slide shows structural weakness rather than blind panic, which means any reversal must appear through rising volume and inflow recovery rather than pure emotion. Traders hunt for signs that shorts may reach exhaustion as they did during past rebounds.Institutions Accumulate While Retail Steps BackInstitutional appetite continues to grow even as retail traders exit. U.S. spot XRP ETFs attracted $906 million in net inflows since launch, with not a single day of outflows. The flagship XRPC ETF now holds $336 million, which places it above every competing fund.Franklin Templeton now lists XRP as a top-four holding in its regulated multi-asset crypto product. These flows form a clear divergence: Institutional portfolios build long-horizon positions while retail traders short the asset. The setup shows a market where deep pockets accumulate quietly below the surface, waiting for fear to drain out of the system.Ripple’s $4B Expansion Reshapes Global FinanceRipple pushed aggressively into global finance through a $4 billion acquisition wave across GTreasury, Rail, Palisade, and Ripple Prime. The company now holds strategic control over treasury management, liquidity services, payments, and institutional crypto infrastructure. Regulatory traction strengthens the expansion. Approvals in Singapore and the UAE, plus FSRA authorization of the RLUSD stablecoin, anchor Ripple inside the regulated payments ecosystem. Ripple also reached a major U.S. milestone when Bitnomial launched the first CFTC-approved XRP spot product. This move places XRP beside commodities such as Treasuries on a federally regulated exchange. Markets have not priced this transformation yet, leaving a wide gap between Ripple’s operational dominance and XRP’s market performance.On-Chain Data Reveals a Structural SplitThe XRP Ledger shows its highest transaction velocity of the year at 0.0324, marking strong network usage. Open interest climbed to $3.85 billion while funding rates stayed negative, which confirms heavy short positioning. A regional concentration also emerges: Upbit holds more than six billion XRP, far above Binance at 2.6 billion. The imbalance introduces the risk of region-based liquidation waves during volatility spikes. Liquidity remains deep and participation strong, yet direction stays capped by pressure from leveraged traders.Long-Term Holders Rotate as Whales Step InLong-term holder dormancy dropped ninety-one percent since mid-November, signaling that older coins rarely move. At the same time, cohorts that held XRP for six months to three years trimmed positions and locked in profits. Institutions absorbed much of that volume through ETF demand, which removed nearly half a percent of total supply from circulation as ETFs crossed one billion dollars in assets under management. Whales keep buying while early holders reduce exposure. This rotation delays any strong recovery but builds the foundation for a future supply squeeze once distribution slows.XRP now enters a rare moment where institutional strength outweighs retail fear, setting the stage for a potential shift once the market resolves its internal pressure.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/06 21:24
XRP Price Prediction for December 7: Sellers Continue to Dominate as Weak Momentum Persists

XRP Price Prediction for December 7: Sellers Continue to Dominate as Weak Momentum Persists

XRP struggles below $2.05, with bearish sentiment dominating market momentum. Weak spot inflows signal cautious sentiment as traders avoid aggressive positions. $2.00 support zone crucial; failure risks further declines towards $1.72. XRP’s price outlook for December 7 reveals ongoing weakness, as the cryptocurrency hovers near $2.03, continuing its downward trend since September. The failure to maintain any meaningful upward movement, coupled with consistent rejections at higher levels, has shifted the market bias firmly in favor of sellers. The token is now testing the critical $2.00 support zone, and if it fails to hold, further downside could be imminent. Also Read: Ethereum Price Prediction for November 9: Sellers Dominate as Weak Flows Persist Price Action and Key Technical Indicators XRP’s price action remains confined to a descending channel, with every rebound met with rejection at lower levels. The Supertrend indicator remains red, signaling ongoing bearish pressure, and the Parabolic SAR dots continue to sit above the price, reinforcing the dominance of sellers. Currently, the $2.00 level is a key support zone, but the inability to sustain a recovery above this level could lead to further losses, targeting $1.83 and $1.72. Source: Tradingview On the one-hour chart, XRP broke below a short-term ascending trendline, which had previously supported a minor recovery attempt. This has caused the price to consolidate beneath the trendline, keeping the bearish bias intact for the short term. Additionally, XRP remains within the lower half of the Bollinger Bands, indicating that downward pressure persists, with little sign of a sustained reversal. Market Sentiment and Data Reinforce Bearish Outlook Recent spot market data reveals weak flows, as $4.36 million in inflows were recorded in the latest session. However, these inflows seem more reactive than proactive, signaling a lack of strong accumulation interest and a market still wary of significant upside potential. Traders appear more focused on stabilizing the price rather than seeking aggressive bullish positions, indicating that sentiment remains fragile. Source: Coinglass In the derivatives market, open interest stands at $3.64 billion, showing a decline from recent highs. This drop, along with an 18% decrease in futures volume and a 60% collapse in options volume, underscores a lack of conviction in the market. Top traders remain predominantly net-long, but their reduced exposure further suggests a cautious approach in the current environment. XRP Price Forecast Looking ahead to December 7, the outlook remains largely bearish unless XRP can reclaim key resistance levels. A break above $2.15 and $2.39 would signal a potential shift in momentum, opening the door to higher targets such as $2.62 and $2.91. However, if the $2.00 support fails to hold, XRP is at risk of further declines towards $1.83 and $1.72. The technical indicators, spot flows, and derivatives data all point to continued bearish momentum for XRP. Sellers remain in control, and any recovery attempts are likely to face strong resistance. The next few sessions will be critical in determining whether the price can stabilize or if further downside is ahead. Also Read: Ethereum Classic (ETC) Price Prediction 2025–2029: Can ETC Hit $20 Soon? The post XRP Price Prediction for December 7: Sellers Continue to Dominate as Weak Momentum Persists appeared first on 36Crypto.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/06 21:06