Written by Haotian To be honest, the black swan event of October 11th made me, an originally optimistic industry observer, feel a sense of despair. I originally understood the current "Three Kingdoms" situation in the crypto industry, thinking that it was a fight between the gods and retail investors would get some meat. However, after experiencing this bloodbath and unraveling the underlying logic, I found that this was not the case. To put it bluntly, we originally thought that the technical community was innovating, exchanges were generating traffic, and Wall Street was allocating funds. The three parties were each doing their own thing. As long as we retail investors seize the opportunity, follow the wave of technological innovation, take advantage of hot spots, and rush in when funds enter the market, we can always get a share of the profits. However, after experiencing the bloodbath on October 11, I suddenly realized that these three parties might not be competing in an orderly manner at all, but were instead harvesting all the liquidity in the market? The first force: exchanges monopolize traffic and are vampires that control traffic and liquidity pools. To be honest, I used to think that exchanges just wanted to expand their platforms, increase traffic, expand their ecosystems, and make a lot of money. However, the USDe's cross-margin liquidation incident exposed the powerlessness of retail investors under the rules of the exchange platform. The leverage level increased by the platform to improve the product and service experience and the unclear risk control capabilities are actually traps for retail investors. Various rebate programs, Alpha and MEME launch pads, various revolving loans, and highly leveraged contract trading methods are constantly emerging. While these seemingly offer retail investors numerous profit opportunities, if exchanges can no longer withstand the risk of on-chain DeFi cascading liquidations, retail investors will also be dragged down. Life is like that. What's particularly frightening is that the top 10 exchanges generated $21.6 trillion in trading volume in Q2, yet overall market liquidity is declining. Where did the money go? Besides transaction fees, there's also various liquidations. Who's draining the liquidity? The second force: Wall Street capital, entering the market under the guise of compliance I was particularly looking forward to Wall Street entering the market, thinking that institutional funds could bring greater stability to the market. After all, institutions are long-term players and can bring incremental injections into the market. We will then reap the industry dividends of the integration of Crypto and TradFi. However, before this recent plunge, there were reports of whales profiting from precise short selling. Several wallets, suspected to be Wall Street structures, initiated massive airdrop positions before the crash, generating hundreds of millions in profits. Similar reports abound, resembling insider information. However, in these moments of panic, it makes one wonder: how do institutions consistently gain the advantage of "front-loading" before black swan events? These TradFi institutions, under the guise of compliance and capital, are actually entering the market. What are they actually doing? Using stablecoin public chains to tie up the DeFi ecosystem, using ETF channels to control capital flows, and using various financial tools to gradually erode the market's voice? On the surface, they claim to be doing this for industry development, but what is the reality? There are too many conspiracy theories about the Trump family's wealth to elaborate on. The third force: technology natives + retail developers, cannon fodder caught in the middle. I think this is where most of the retail investors, developers, and so-called builders in the market are truly desperate. Since last year, it has been said that many altcoins have been brought down, but this time it directly broke through to zero, forcing people to see the facts clearly: the liquidity of many altcoins is almost exhausted. The problem is, infra technical debt is piling up, application rollouts are failing to meet expectations, and developers are toiling away on building, only to find the market isn't buying it. Therefore, I can't see how the altcoin market will rebound. I don't understand how these altcoin projects will seize liquidity from exchanges, or how they will compete with Wall Street institutions in their ability to manipulate prices. If the market doesn't buy into the narrative, if the market is left with only so-called meme gambling, then the altcoin market will be a complete liquidation and reshuffle. Developers will flee, and there will be a structured reshuffle of market participants. Will the market return to nothingness? Oh, it's too difficult! so..... If the crypto industry's "Three Kingdoms" situation continues, with exchanges monopolizing the market, Wall Street profiting, and retail investors and technical analysts being domineering, this will be a disaster for the cyclical nature of crypto trading. In the long run, the market will only leave a few short-term winners and all long-term losers.Written by Haotian To be honest, the black swan event of October 11th made me, an originally optimistic industry observer, feel a sense of despair. I originally understood the current "Three Kingdoms" situation in the crypto industry, thinking that it was a fight between the gods and retail investors would get some meat. However, after experiencing this bloodbath and unraveling the underlying logic, I found that this was not the case. To put it bluntly, we originally thought that the technical community was innovating, exchanges were generating traffic, and Wall Street was allocating funds. The three parties were each doing their own thing. As long as we retail investors seize the opportunity, follow the wave of technological innovation, take advantage of hot spots, and rush in when funds enter the market, we can always get a share of the profits. However, after experiencing the bloodbath on October 11, I suddenly realized that these three parties might not be competing in an orderly manner at all, but were instead harvesting all the liquidity in the market? The first force: exchanges monopolize traffic and are vampires that control traffic and liquidity pools. To be honest, I used to think that exchanges just wanted to expand their platforms, increase traffic, expand their ecosystems, and make a lot of money. However, the USDe's cross-margin liquidation incident exposed the powerlessness of retail investors under the rules of the exchange platform. The leverage level increased by the platform to improve the product and service experience and the unclear risk control capabilities are actually traps for retail investors. Various rebate programs, Alpha and MEME launch pads, various revolving loans, and highly leveraged contract trading methods are constantly emerging. While these seemingly offer retail investors numerous profit opportunities, if exchanges can no longer withstand the risk of on-chain DeFi cascading liquidations, retail investors will also be dragged down. Life is like that. What's particularly frightening is that the top 10 exchanges generated $21.6 trillion in trading volume in Q2, yet overall market liquidity is declining. Where did the money go? Besides transaction fees, there's also various liquidations. Who's draining the liquidity? The second force: Wall Street capital, entering the market under the guise of compliance I was particularly looking forward to Wall Street entering the market, thinking that institutional funds could bring greater stability to the market. After all, institutions are long-term players and can bring incremental injections into the market. We will then reap the industry dividends of the integration of Crypto and TradFi. However, before this recent plunge, there were reports of whales profiting from precise short selling. Several wallets, suspected to be Wall Street structures, initiated massive airdrop positions before the crash, generating hundreds of millions in profits. Similar reports abound, resembling insider information. However, in these moments of panic, it makes one wonder: how do institutions consistently gain the advantage of "front-loading" before black swan events? These TradFi institutions, under the guise of compliance and capital, are actually entering the market. What are they actually doing? Using stablecoin public chains to tie up the DeFi ecosystem, using ETF channels to control capital flows, and using various financial tools to gradually erode the market's voice? On the surface, they claim to be doing this for industry development, but what is the reality? There are too many conspiracy theories about the Trump family's wealth to elaborate on. The third force: technology natives + retail developers, cannon fodder caught in the middle. I think this is where most of the retail investors, developers, and so-called builders in the market are truly desperate. Since last year, it has been said that many altcoins have been brought down, but this time it directly broke through to zero, forcing people to see the facts clearly: the liquidity of many altcoins is almost exhausted. The problem is, infra technical debt is piling up, application rollouts are failing to meet expectations, and developers are toiling away on building, only to find the market isn't buying it. Therefore, I can't see how the altcoin market will rebound. I don't understand how these altcoin projects will seize liquidity from exchanges, or how they will compete with Wall Street institutions in their ability to manipulate prices. If the market doesn't buy into the narrative, if the market is left with only so-called meme gambling, then the altcoin market will be a complete liquidation and reshuffle. Developers will flee, and there will be a structured reshuffle of market participants. Will the market return to nothingness? Oh, it's too difficult! so..... If the crypto industry's "Three Kingdoms" situation continues, with exchanges monopolizing the market, Wall Street profiting, and retail investors and technical analysts being domineering, this will be a disaster for the cyclical nature of crypto trading. In the long run, the market will only leave a few short-term winners and all long-term losers.
Exchange monopoly, Wall Street harvesting, and the desperate situation of retail investors
Written by Haotian
To be honest, the black swan event of October 11th made me, an originally optimistic industry observer, feel a sense of despair.
I originally understood the current "Three Kingdoms" situation in the crypto industry, thinking that it was a fight between the gods and retail investors would get some meat. However, after experiencing this bloodbath and unraveling the underlying logic, I found that this was not the case.
To put it bluntly, we originally thought that the technical community was innovating, exchanges were generating traffic, and Wall Street was allocating funds. The three parties were each doing their own thing. As long as we retail investors seize the opportunity, follow the wave of technological innovation, take advantage of hot spots, and rush in when funds enter the market, we can always get a share of the profits.
However, after experiencing the bloodbath on October 11, I suddenly realized that these three parties might not be competing in an orderly manner at all, but were instead harvesting all the liquidity in the market?
The first force: exchanges monopolize traffic and are vampires that control traffic and liquidity pools.
To be honest, I used to think that exchanges just wanted to expand their platforms, increase traffic, expand their ecosystems, and make a lot of money. However, the USDe's cross-margin liquidation incident exposed the powerlessness of retail investors under the rules of the exchange platform. The leverage level increased by the platform to improve the product and service experience and the unclear risk control capabilities are actually traps for retail investors.
Various rebate programs, Alpha and MEME launch pads, various revolving loans, and highly leveraged contract trading methods are constantly emerging. While these seemingly offer retail investors numerous profit opportunities, if exchanges can no longer withstand the risk of on-chain DeFi cascading liquidations, retail investors will also be dragged down. Life is like that.
What's particularly frightening is that the top 10 exchanges generated $21.6 trillion in trading volume in Q2, yet overall market liquidity is declining. Where did the money go? Besides transaction fees, there's also various liquidations. Who's draining the liquidity?
The second force: Wall Street capital, entering the market under the guise of compliance
I was particularly looking forward to Wall Street entering the market, thinking that institutional funds could bring greater stability to the market. After all, institutions are long-term players and can bring incremental injections into the market. We will then reap the industry dividends of the integration of Crypto and TradFi.
However, before this recent plunge, there were reports of whales profiting from precise short selling. Several wallets, suspected to be Wall Street structures, initiated massive airdrop positions before the crash, generating hundreds of millions in profits. Similar reports abound, resembling insider information. However, in these moments of panic, it makes one wonder: how do institutions consistently gain the advantage of "front-loading" before black swan events?
These TradFi institutions, under the guise of compliance and capital, are actually entering the market. What are they actually doing? Using stablecoin public chains to tie up the DeFi ecosystem, using ETF channels to control capital flows, and using various financial tools to gradually erode the market's voice? On the surface, they claim to be doing this for industry development, but what is the reality? There are too many conspiracy theories about the Trump family's wealth to elaborate on.
The third force: technology natives + retail developers, cannon fodder caught in the middle.
I think this is where most of the retail investors, developers, and so-called builders in the market are truly desperate. Since last year, it has been said that many altcoins have been brought down, but this time it directly broke through to zero, forcing people to see the facts clearly: the liquidity of many altcoins is almost exhausted.
The problem is, infra technical debt is piling up, application rollouts are failing to meet expectations, and developers are toiling away on building, only to find the market isn't buying it.
Therefore, I can't see how the altcoin market will rebound. I don't understand how these altcoin projects will seize liquidity from exchanges, or how they will compete with Wall Street institutions in their ability to manipulate prices. If the market doesn't buy into the narrative, if the market is left with only so-called meme gambling, then the altcoin market will be a complete liquidation and reshuffle. Developers will flee, and there will be a structured reshuffle of market participants. Will the market return to nothingness? Oh, it's too difficult!
so.....
If the crypto industry's "Three Kingdoms" situation continues, with exchanges monopolizing the market, Wall Street profiting, and retail investors and technical analysts being domineering, this will be a disaster for the cyclical nature of crypto trading.
In the long run, the market will only leave a few short-term winners and all long-term losers.
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
You May Also Like
XRP Near $2 as ETFs Smash $1B AUM — Institutional Money Quietly Takes Over
XRP trades near $2.04 after climbing more than 12% in the last month, yet the token struggles to reclaim strong momentum. The asset slipped through the past week and lost close to 8% while traders weighed a rare combination of institutional strength and short-term weakness. With a market capitalization near $125 billion and daily volume above $3.3 billion, XRP keeps its position as one of the most liquid crypto assets. The market now watches the psychological $2 support level as heavy inflows clash ih rising short exposure and fading retail conviction.Sentiment Breakdown Creates a Contrarian SetupMarket sentiment around XRP sits inside one of the deepest fear zones since October. Santiment reports that sentiment prints the same level of panic that preceded a sharp twenty-two percent rebound on November 21. RSI sits near 45 and the SAR indicator keeps flipping into bearish territory. Source: XTraders feel trapped between disbelief and fatigue after a two-month decline of thirty-one percent. The present slide shows structural weakness rather than blind panic, which means any reversal must appear through rising volume and inflow recovery rather than pure emotion. Traders hunt for signs that shorts may reach exhaustion as they did during past rebounds.Institutions Accumulate While Retail Steps BackInstitutional appetite continues to grow even as retail traders exit. U.S. spot XRP ETFs attracted $906 million in net inflows since launch, with not a single day of outflows. The flagship XRPC ETF now holds $336 million, which places it above every competing fund.Franklin Templeton now lists XRP as a top-four holding in its regulated multi-asset crypto product. These flows form a clear divergence: Institutional portfolios build long-horizon positions while retail traders short the asset. The setup shows a market where deep pockets accumulate quietly below the surface, waiting for fear to drain out of the system.Ripple’s $4B Expansion Reshapes Global FinanceRipple pushed aggressively into global finance through a $4 billion acquisition wave across GTreasury, Rail, Palisade, and Ripple Prime. The company now holds strategic control over treasury management, liquidity services, payments, and institutional crypto infrastructure. Regulatory traction strengthens the expansion. Approvals in Singapore and the UAE, plus FSRA authorization of the RLUSD stablecoin, anchor Ripple inside the regulated payments ecosystem. Ripple also reached a major U.S. milestone when Bitnomial launched the first CFTC-approved XRP spot product. This move places XRP beside commodities such as Treasuries on a federally regulated exchange. Markets have not priced this transformation yet, leaving a wide gap between Ripple’s operational dominance and XRP’s market performance.On-Chain Data Reveals a Structural SplitThe XRP Ledger shows its highest transaction velocity of the year at 0.0324, marking strong network usage. Open interest climbed to $3.85 billion while funding rates stayed negative, which confirms heavy short positioning. A regional concentration also emerges: Upbit holds more than six billion XRP, far above Binance at 2.6 billion. The imbalance introduces the risk of region-based liquidation waves during volatility spikes. Liquidity remains deep and participation strong, yet direction stays capped by pressure from leveraged traders.Long-Term Holders Rotate as Whales Step InLong-term holder dormancy dropped ninety-one percent since mid-November, signaling that older coins rarely move. At the same time, cohorts that held XRP for six months to three years trimmed positions and locked in profits. Institutions absorbed much of that volume through ETF demand, which removed nearly half a percent of total supply from circulation as ETFs crossed one billion dollars in assets under management. Whales keep buying while early holders reduce exposure. This rotation delays any strong recovery but builds the foundation for a future supply squeeze once distribution slows.XRP now enters a rare moment where institutional strength outweighs retail fear, setting the stage for a potential shift once the market resolves its internal pressure.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/06 21:24
XRP Price Prediction for December 7: Sellers Continue to Dominate as Weak Momentum Persists
XRP struggles below $2.05, with bearish sentiment dominating market momentum. Weak spot inflows signal cautious sentiment as traders avoid aggressive positions. $2.00 support zone crucial; failure risks further declines towards $1.72. XRP’s price outlook for December 7 reveals ongoing weakness, as the cryptocurrency hovers near $2.03, continuing its downward trend since September. The failure to maintain any meaningful upward movement, coupled with consistent rejections at higher levels, has shifted the market bias firmly in favor of sellers. The token is now testing the critical $2.00 support zone, and if it fails to hold, further downside could be imminent. Also Read: Ethereum Price Prediction for November 9: Sellers Dominate as Weak Flows Persist Price Action and Key Technical Indicators XRP’s price action remains confined to a descending channel, with every rebound met with rejection at lower levels. The Supertrend indicator remains red, signaling ongoing bearish pressure, and the Parabolic SAR dots continue to sit above the price, reinforcing the dominance of sellers. Currently, the $2.00 level is a key support zone, but the inability to sustain a recovery above this level could lead to further losses, targeting $1.83 and $1.72. Source: Tradingview On the one-hour chart, XRP broke below a short-term ascending trendline, which had previously supported a minor recovery attempt. This has caused the price to consolidate beneath the trendline, keeping the bearish bias intact for the short term. Additionally, XRP remains within the lower half of the Bollinger Bands, indicating that downward pressure persists, with little sign of a sustained reversal. Market Sentiment and Data Reinforce Bearish Outlook Recent spot market data reveals weak flows, as $4.36 million in inflows were recorded in the latest session. However, these inflows seem more reactive than proactive, signaling a lack of strong accumulation interest and a market still wary of significant upside potential. Traders appear more focused on stabilizing the price rather than seeking aggressive bullish positions, indicating that sentiment remains fragile. Source: Coinglass In the derivatives market, open interest stands at $3.64 billion, showing a decline from recent highs. This drop, along with an 18% decrease in futures volume and a 60% collapse in options volume, underscores a lack of conviction in the market. Top traders remain predominantly net-long, but their reduced exposure further suggests a cautious approach in the current environment. XRP Price Forecast Looking ahead to December 7, the outlook remains largely bearish unless XRP can reclaim key resistance levels. A break above $2.15 and $2.39 would signal a potential shift in momentum, opening the door to higher targets such as $2.62 and $2.91. However, if the $2.00 support fails to hold, XRP is at risk of further declines towards $1.83 and $1.72. The technical indicators, spot flows, and derivatives data all point to continued bearish momentum for XRP. Sellers remain in control, and any recovery attempts are likely to face strong resistance. The next few sessions will be critical in determining whether the price can stabilize or if further downside is ahead. Also Read: Ethereum Classic (ETC) Price Prediction 2025–2029: Can ETC Hit $20 Soon? The post XRP Price Prediction for December 7: Sellers Continue to Dominate as Weak Momentum Persists appeared first on 36Crypto.
Share
Coinstats2025/12/06 21:06
The Federal Reserve cut interest rates by 25 basis points, and Powell said this was a risk management cut
PANews reported on September 18th, according to the Securities Times, that at 2:00 AM Beijing time on September 18th, the Federal Reserve announced a 25 basis point interest rate cut, lowering the federal funds rate from 4.25%-4.50% to 4.00%-4.25%, in line with market expectations. The Fed's interest rate announcement triggered a sharp market reaction, with the three major US stock indices rising briefly before quickly plunging. The US dollar index plummeted, briefly hitting a new low since 2025, before rebounding sharply, turning a decline into an upward trend. The sharp market volatility was closely tied to the subsequent monetary policy press conference held by Federal Reserve Chairman Powell. He stated that the 50 basis point rate cut lacked broad support and that there was no need for a swift adjustment. Today's move could be viewed as a risk-management cut, suggesting the Fed will not enter a sustained cycle of rate cuts. Powell reiterated the Fed's unwavering commitment to maintaining its independence. Market participants are currently unaware of the risks to the Fed's independence. The latest published interest rate dot plot shows that the median expectation of Fed officials is to cut interest rates twice more this year (by 25 basis points each), one more than predicted in June this year. At the same time, Fed officials expect that after three rate cuts this year, there will be another 25 basis point cut in 2026 and 2027.
Share
PANews2025/09/18 06:54