The post Jamie Dimon Called JPMorgan Expensive. Investors Disagree. appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. It’s the best of times for Jamie Dimon. JPMorgan’s stock has lapped the S&P 500 Index this year. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) Getty Images “I want to make it really clear, OK? We’re not going to buy back a lot of stock at these prices,” said billionaire JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon during the bank’s annual meeting in May of 2024. “Buying back stock of a financial company greatly in excess of two times tangible book is a mistake. We aren’t going to do it.” At the time, JPMorgan’s shares traded at 2.4 times their tangible book value, a measure of a bank’s market price compared to its tangible net worth. That figure strips out goodwill and other intangibles and focuses on assets that can be measured, such as loans and deposits. The ratio is a simple way to judge the premium investors are paying for what the bank actually owns. Today that multiple is above three times, a level JPMorgan hasn’t reached since 2002. And yet, the bank’s stock is up 28% this year, roughly twice the S&P 500’s gain. It’s rising alongside almost everything else. The S&P 500 itself is at record highs. Gold has crossed $4,000 for the first time. Bitcoin just notched a new record this week of $126,296. Many investors now talk about an “everything bubble,” where every major asset seems priced for perfection. It’s worth asking if the nation’s largest bank, with $4.6 trillion in assets, is part of it too. But some analysts say JPMorgan’s valuation has more to do with strength than speculation. One of them is Christopher McGratty, head of U.S. bank research at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, who says the premium is earned. “It’s expensive,” says McGratty, “but you get what you pay for.” The average regional bank in… The post Jamie Dimon Called JPMorgan Expensive. Investors Disagree. appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. It’s the best of times for Jamie Dimon. JPMorgan’s stock has lapped the S&P 500 Index this year. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images) Getty Images “I want to make it really clear, OK? We’re not going to buy back a lot of stock at these prices,” said billionaire JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon during the bank’s annual meeting in May of 2024. “Buying back stock of a financial company greatly in excess of two times tangible book is a mistake. We aren’t going to do it.” At the time, JPMorgan’s shares traded at 2.4 times their tangible book value, a measure of a bank’s market price compared to its tangible net worth. That figure strips out goodwill and other intangibles and focuses on assets that can be measured, such as loans and deposits. The ratio is a simple way to judge the premium investors are paying for what the bank actually owns. Today that multiple is above three times, a level JPMorgan hasn’t reached since 2002. And yet, the bank’s stock is up 28% this year, roughly twice the S&P 500’s gain. It’s rising alongside almost everything else. The S&P 500 itself is at record highs. Gold has crossed $4,000 for the first time. Bitcoin just notched a new record this week of $126,296. Many investors now talk about an “everything bubble,” where every major asset seems priced for perfection. It’s worth asking if the nation’s largest bank, with $4.6 trillion in assets, is part of it too. But some analysts say JPMorgan’s valuation has more to do with strength than speculation. One of them is Christopher McGratty, head of U.S. bank research at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, who says the premium is earned. “It’s expensive,” says McGratty, “but you get what you pay for.” The average regional bank in…

Jamie Dimon Called JPMorgan Expensive. Investors Disagree.

It’s the best of times for Jamie Dimon. JPMorgan’s stock has lapped the S&P 500 Index this year. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Getty Images

“I want to make it really clear, OK? We’re not going to buy back a lot of stock at these prices,” said billionaire JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon during the bank’s annual meeting in May of 2024. “Buying back stock of a financial company greatly in excess of two times tangible book is a mistake. We aren’t going to do it.”

At the time, JPMorgan’s shares traded at 2.4 times their tangible book value, a measure of a bank’s market price compared to its tangible net worth. That figure strips out goodwill and other intangibles and focuses on assets that can be measured, such as loans and deposits. The ratio is a simple way to judge the premium investors are paying for what the bank actually owns.

Today that multiple is above three times, a level JPMorgan hasn’t reached since 2002. And yet, the bank’s stock is up 28% this year, roughly twice the S&P 500’s gain. It’s rising alongside almost everything else. The S&P 500 itself is at record highs. Gold has crossed $4,000 for the first time. Bitcoin just notched a new record this week of $126,296. Many investors now talk about an “everything bubble,” where every major asset seems priced for perfection. It’s worth asking if the nation’s largest bank, with $4.6 trillion in assets, is part of it too.

But some analysts say JPMorgan’s valuation has more to do with strength than speculation.

One of them is Christopher McGratty, head of U.S. bank research at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, who says the premium is earned. “It’s expensive,” says McGratty, “but you get what you pay for.” The average regional bank in KBW’s index trades around 1.7 times tangible book. Even JPMorgan’s biggest peers—Bank of America at 1.8, Wells Fargo at 1.9, and Citigroup at 1.0—trail far behind. The reason, McGratty says, is quality. JPMorgan delivers higher and steadier returns than anyone else, with a 17 percent return on common equity, five points above the next-best large commercial bank. “They’re running five-minute miles while everyone else runs eight,” he says.

A big part of that edge comes from technology, according to McGratty.

JPMorgan plans to spend about $18 billion this year on tech, more than many regional banks spend on all their expenses combined. Roughly $10 billion keeps systems running. The other $8 billion goes toward new products, platforms, and modern infrastructure. “They’re trying to create a wedge to peers that they can outrun for generations,” says McGratty. It’s an effort to become more efficient and durable, with artificial intelligence and cloud computing now core to the business. KBW rates the stock “outperform,” calling it the closest thing the banking sector has to a growth company.

Quality, for now, has a price. JPMorgan’s tangible book multiple is the highest among the 12 commercial banks in the S&P 500. However, its 17 percent return on common equity is also the best. And with the stock up 28 percent this year—seven points ahead of runner-up Citizens Financial—investors seem happy to pay up.

Still, it takes conviction to buy a stock the CEO once called rich at a lower valuation than it presently trades at. Fourteen percent of analysts tracked by FactSet now rate JPMorgan a sell, the highest level in at least five years. Yet the bank isn’t acting cautious. In January, it increased share buybacks, just seven months after Dimon said it wouldn’t.

JPMorgan didn’t respond to a request for comment.

More from Forbes

ForbesHere’s Why Gold And Stocks Are Both Setting Record Highs, Something That Rarely HappensForbesHere’s Why Old Homes Suddenly Cost More Than New OnesForbesSBA’s New Rule Makes It Easier To Expand Small BusinessesForbesThe Government Shutdown Puts Small Business Lending On Ice

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/brandonkochkodin/2025/10/08/why-jpmorgans-rising-stock-defies-traditional-valuations-and-jamie-dimons-own-advice/

Market Opportunity
PoP Planet Logo
PoP Planet Price(P)
$0.01045
$0.01045$0.01045
-0.57%
USD
PoP Planet (P) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
Softer CPI keeps PBoC easing in play – TD Securities

Softer CPI keeps PBoC easing in play – TD Securities

The post Softer CPI keeps PBoC easing in play – TD Securities appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. TD Securities expects China’s January CPI to slow, with its forecast
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/11 05:47
XRP price prediction – Odds of hitting the $2-level in February are…

XRP price prediction – Odds of hitting the $2-level in February are…

The post XRP price prediction – Odds of hitting the $2-level in February are… appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Like the broader crypto market, XRP’s relief
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/02/11 06:01