Mexican billionaire Ricardo Salinas Pliego, one of Latin America's wealthiest individuals and a long-time Bitcoin advocate, has declared that despite Bitcoin's significant price appreciation over the years, it remains early for cryptocurrency adoption.Mexican billionaire Ricardo Salinas Pliego, one of Latin America's wealthiest individuals and a long-time Bitcoin advocate, has declared that despite Bitcoin's significant price appreciation over the years, it remains early for cryptocurrency adoption.

Billionaire Ricardo Salinas: "It's Still Early for Bitcoin" - Calls BTC "The Ultimate Hard Asset"

2025/10/31 14:43
10 min read

Mexican billionaire Ricardo Salinas Pliego, one of Latin America's wealthiest individuals and a long-time Bitcoin advocate, has declared that despite Bitcoin's significant price appreciation over the years, it remains early for cryptocurrency adoption. In a recent statement that has energized the crypto community, Salinas emphasized that "Bitcoin is the ultimate hard asset," reinforcing his bullish long-term outlook on digital currency.

Who is Ricardo Salinas?

Ricardo Salinas Pliego ranks among Mexico's richest individuals with an estimated net worth exceeding $13 billion. He chairs Grupo Salinas, a conglomerate spanning retail, banking, telecommunications, and media sectors. His flagship companies include Grupo Elektra (retail and financial services), TV Azteca (broadcasting), and Banco Azteca (banking).

Unlike many traditional finance billionaires who dismissed cryptocurrency, Salinas embraced Bitcoin early. He has consistently allocated a significant portion of his liquid portfolio to Bitcoin, reportedly maintaining 10-20% exposure to the cryptocurrency. This makes him one of the most prominent billionaire Bitcoin advocates globally, alongside Michael Saylor and the Winklevoss twins.

Salinas's influence extends beyond personal wealth. His companies serve millions of customers across Latin America, giving his pro-Bitcoin stance significant cultural and economic weight in regions where cryptocurrency adoption addresses real financial inclusion challenges.

Salinas's Latest Bitcoin Statement

In his recent comments, Salinas made two key assertions that captured attention across financial media and cryptocurrency circles.

First, he emphasized that despite Bitcoin's journey from obscurity to a multi-trillion dollar asset class, "it's still early for Bitcoin." This statement challenges the narrative that Bitcoin's best growth days are behind it. Salinas argues that current adoption represents merely the beginning of cryptocurrency's integration into global finance.

Second, Salinas described Bitcoin as "the ultimate hard asset." This characterization positions Bitcoin alongside or even above traditional hard assets like gold, real estate, and commodities. By calling it the "ultimate" hard asset, Salinas suggests Bitcoin possesses superior properties compared to conventional stores of value.

These comments came amid renewed institutional interest in Bitcoin following successful spot ETF launches and increasing sovereign adoption, lending additional weight to Salinas's optimistic assessment.

Why Salinas Believes It's Still Early for Bitcoin

Several factors support Salinas's view that Bitcoin adoption remains in early stages despite significant progress.

Global adoption statistics reveal that fewer than 5% of the world's population owns Bitcoin. Even in countries with high cryptocurrency awareness, actual ownership remains limited. This suggests vast untapped potential as awareness and accessibility improve.

Institutional adoption continues accelerating but represents a small fraction of total institutional capital. Major pension funds, sovereign wealth funds, and endowments are only beginning to allocate to Bitcoin. As regulatory clarity improves and infrastructure matures, institutional flows could dwarf current investment levels.

Sovereign adoption remains nascent. While El Salvador pioneered Bitcoin as legal tender and several nations have added Bitcoin to reserves, most countries haven't formally engaged with cryptocurrency. If even a fraction of global nations add Bitcoin to strategic reserves, demand would increase dramatically.

Infrastructure development continues evolving. Bitcoin's Lightning Network, layer-2 solutions, and custody infrastructure are still maturing. As these systems become more robust and user-friendly, Bitcoin becomes accessible to broader populations.

Generational wealth transfer will favor Bitcoin. Younger generations show significantly higher cryptocurrency affinity than older cohorts. As wealth transfers to millennials and Gen Z over coming decades, Bitcoin allocation will likely increase substantially.

Bitcoin as "The Ultimate Hard Asset"

Salinas's characterization of Bitcoin as the ultimate hard asset reflects several unique properties that distinguish it from traditional hard assets.

Absolute scarcity sets Bitcoin apart. Unlike gold, which continues being mined, or real estate, which can be developed, Bitcoin has a fixed supply of 21 million coins. This absolute scarcity makes it uniquely resistant to inflation through supply increases.

Portability exceeds all physical assets. Bitcoin can be transferred globally in minutes, regardless of amount. Try moving $100 million in gold or real estate across borders, and the advantages become apparent.

Divisibility enables unprecedented flexibility. Bitcoin can be divided into 100 million satoshis, allowing transactions of any size. This makes it functional as both large-scale store of value and medium of exchange.

Censorship resistance provides protection unavailable with traditional assets. Properly secured Bitcoin cannot be seized, frozen, or confiscated by governments or institutions. This property proves invaluable in jurisdictions with unstable governance.

Verifiability is instantaneous and certain. Unlike gold, which requires assaying, or real estate, which requires title verification, Bitcoin ownership can be verified cryptographically in seconds.

Durability surpasses physical assets. Bitcoin cannot corrode, decay, or deteriorate. As long as the network exists, Bitcoin remains perfectly preserved.

These properties combine to create what Salinas considers the ultimate hard asset—superior to gold in portability and verifiability, superior to real estate in divisibility and transferability, and superior to fiat currency in scarcity and censorship resistance.

Salinas's Bitcoin Journey

Ricardo Salinas's Bitcoin advocacy didn't emerge overnight. His journey reflects evolving understanding and increasing conviction.

Around 2013, Salinas first encountered Bitcoin but initially dismissed it as speculative novelty. However, unlike many who maintained skepticism, he continued researching the technology and economic implications.

By 2020, Salinas publicly disclosed significant Bitcoin holdings, announcing that approximately 10% of his liquid portfolio was allocated to cryptocurrency. This announcement surprised many in traditional finance circles but resonated with cryptocurrency advocates.

In 2021, Salinas became increasingly vocal, encouraging followers to consider Bitcoin allocation and criticizing fiat currency debasement. He frequently compared Bitcoin favorably to government-issued currencies experiencing inflation.

Salinas also promoted Bitcoin adoption through his businesses. Grupo Elektra began accepting Bitcoin payments, and he encouraged Banco Azteca to explore cryptocurrency services, though regulatory constraints limited implementation.

Throughout 2022-2025, as cryptocurrency markets experienced volatility, Salinas maintained conviction. Unlike some who retreated during downturns, he used weakness to increase positions and reiterated long-term bullishness.

Comparison with Other Billionaire Bitcoin Advocates

Salinas joins a growing but still select group of billionaire Bitcoin advocates. Comparing their approaches reveals different motivations and strategies.

Michael Saylor perhaps represents the most aggressive institutional Bitcoin strategy. Through MicroStrategy, Saylor accumulated over 250,000 Bitcoin, making it the largest corporate holder. His advocacy focuses on Bitcoin as superior treasury reserve asset and protection against monetary debasement.

The Winklevoss Twins (Cameron and Tyler) became Bitcoin billionaires through early adoption and founding Gemini exchange. Their advocacy emphasizes Bitcoin's role in creating fairer, more accessible financial systems.

Elon Musk's relationship with Bitcoin has been complicated. Tesla purchased $1.5 billion in Bitcoin but later suspended Bitcoin payments due to environmental concerns. Musk's influence on cryptocurrency markets proved significant but inconsistent.

Jack Dorsey advocates for Bitcoin specifically (not cryptocurrency generally) as internet-native money. Through Block (formerly Square), he's invested in Bitcoin infrastructure and Lightning Network development.

Salinas's position is unique in representing Latin American perspective. While Saylor focuses on corporate treasury strategy and Dorsey on infrastructure, Salinas emphasizes Bitcoin's role in emerging markets where monetary instability and financial exclusion make cryptocurrency's value proposition most compelling.

The Latin American Context

Salinas's Bitcoin advocacy carries particular significance in Latin America, where economic conditions create strong cryptocurrency use cases.

Currency instability afflicts many Latin American nations. Argentina, Venezuela, and others have experienced hyperinflation or severe devaluation. For citizens in these countries, Bitcoin represents escape from local currency deterioration.

Financial exclusion remains widespread. According to World Bank data, over 200 million Latin Americans lack basic banking access. Bitcoin and cryptocurrency offer financial services without traditional banking infrastructure.

Remittances represent crucial economic flows. Latin America receives over $140 billion annually in remittances, with traditional services charging 5-7% fees. Bitcoin enables cheaper, faster transfers.

Distrust of institutions runs deep in regions with histories of corruption, bank failures, and currency controls. Bitcoin's decentralized nature appeals to populations skeptical of centralized financial authority.

Salinas understands these dynamics intimately. His businesses serve customers facing these exact challenges, giving his Bitcoin advocacy practical grounding beyond theoretical economic arguments.

Market Reaction to Salinas's Comments

Financial markets and cryptocurrency communities responded positively to Salinas's latest Bitcoin comments. Bitcoin price saw modest appreciation following the statement, gaining approximately 2% in subsequent trading.

Social media engagement spiked significantly. Salinas's Twitter/X post garnered hundreds of thousands of interactions, with cryptocurrency advocates sharing the message widely. The phrase "ultimate hard asset" trended in crypto-related discussions.

Traditional finance commentators offered mixed reactions. Some acknowledged Salinas's point about early adoption stages, while skeptics questioned whether Bitcoin truly qualifies as superior hard asset compared to gold's millennia-long track record.

Latin American cryptocurrency exchanges reported increased sign-ups and trading volume following Salinas's statement, suggesting his influence on regional adoption remains strong.

The "Still Early" Thesis: Supporting Evidence

Multiple metrics support Salinas's assertion that Bitcoin adoption remains early despite significant progress.

Network growth continues accelerating. Bitcoin's number of unique addresses continues growing, with over 1 million addresses created monthly. This indicates expanding user base rather than saturation.

Exchange reserves decline, suggesting long-term holding increases. Investors moving Bitcoin off exchanges into cold storage typically signals conviction in long-term appreciation.

Institutional products expand. New Bitcoin investment vehicles launch regularly, from ETFs to structured products to lending platforms. This infrastructure development indicates maturing but still-developing market.

Regulatory frameworks emerge, creating legal clarity that enables broader participation. The U.S., EU, and other jurisdictions have implemented or are developing comprehensive cryptocurrency regulations.

Corporate treasuries begin allocating, following MicroStrategy's lead. While still rare, more companies consider Bitcoin as treasury reserve asset, trend likely to accelerate.

Nation-state adoption progresses. Beyond El Salvador, multiple countries explore Bitcoin reserves or legal tender status, representing potentially transformative adoption phase.

Challenges to Wider Bitcoin Adoption

Despite optimistic outlook, several challenges could slow Bitcoin's path to mainstream adoption.

Regulatory uncertainty persists in many jurisdictions. While some countries embrace cryptocurrency, others maintain restrictive or unclear positions, limiting institutional participation.

Volatility concerns deter conservative investors. Bitcoin's price fluctuations, while decreasing over time, remain significant compared to traditional assets, making allocation challenging for risk-averse portfolios.

Technical complexity creates barriers for average users. Concepts like private keys, hardware wallets, and self-custody remain intimidating for many potential adopters.

Scalability limitations affect Bitcoin's transaction capacity. While Lightning Network addresses this, adoption of layer-2 solutions remains incomplete.

Environmental criticisms persist despite increasing renewable energy usage in mining. Bitcoin's energy consumption remains controversial point affecting institutional and sovereign adoption.

Competition from alternatives includes both other cryptocurrencies and evolving traditional payment systems. Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) may offer some cryptocurrency benefits within existing regulatory frameworks.

What "Ultimate Hard Asset" Means for Investors

Salinas's characterization of Bitcoin as ultimate hard asset has implications for portfolio construction and investment strategy.

Traditional portfolio theory suggests allocating to hard assets as inflation protection and diversification. If Bitcoin truly represents superior hard asset, it deserves meaningful portfolio allocation alongside or replacing traditional hard assets.

The "ultimate" designation suggests Bitcoin should receive higher allocation than partial hedge position. Some advocates recommend 5-10% Bitcoin allocation, with aggressive proponents like Saylor suggesting much higher percentages.

For institutional investors, categorizing Bitcoin as hard asset rather than speculative technology investment changes risk assessment. Hard assets belong in diversified portfolios, while speculative positions remain peripheral.

This framing also affects how Bitcoin fits into wealth preservation strategy. If Bitcoin is ultimate hard asset, it becomes appropriate for multi-generational wealth storage, not just tactical trades.

Conclusion

Ricardo Salinas's assertion that "it's still early for Bitcoin" and characterization of cryptocurrency as "the ultimate hard asset" reflects growing conviction among elite investors that Bitcoin represents fundamental innovation rather than speculative bubble.

As one of Latin America's most influential business leaders, Salinas's continued advocacy carries weight beyond personal portfolio positioning. His perspective bridges developed market theoretical interest and emerging market practical necessity, offering unique insights into Bitcoin's potential global role.

Whether Bitcoin ultimately fulfills Salinas's vision as the ultimate hard asset remains to be seen. However, his argument that adoption remains early despite significant progress finds support in statistics, infrastructure development, and institutional behavior. For investors considering Bitcoin allocation, Salinas represents a data point suggesting that despite impressive growth, cryptocurrency's most significant adoption phase may still lie ahead.

Market Opportunity
Bitcoin Logo
Bitcoin Price(BTC)
$69,338.97
$69,338.97$69,338.97
+0.27%
USD
Bitcoin (BTC) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles published on this page are written by independent contributors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of MEXC. All content is intended for informational and educational purposes only and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile — please conduct your own research and consult a licensed financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

You May Also Like

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

HitPaw API is Integrated by Comfy for Professional Image and Video Enhancement to Global Creators

SAN FRANCISCO, Feb. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ — HitPaw, a leader in AI-powered visual enhancement solutions, announced Comfy, a global content creation platform, is
Share
AI Journal2026/02/08 09:15
Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

Journalist gives brutal review of Melania movie: 'Not a single person in the theater'

A Journalist gave a brutal review of the new Melania documentary, which has been criticized by those who say it won't make back the huge fees spent to make it,
Share
Rawstory2026/02/08 09:08
Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Facts Vs. Hype: Analyst Examines XRP Supply Shock Theory

Prominent analyst Cheeky Crypto (203,000 followers on YouTube) set out to verify a fast-spreading claim that XRP’s circulating supply could “vanish overnight,” and his conclusion is more nuanced than the headline suggests: nothing in the ledger disappears, but the amount of XRP that is truly liquid could be far smaller than most dashboards imply—small enough, in his view, to set the stage for an abrupt liquidity squeeze if demand spikes. XRP Supply Shock? The video opens with the host acknowledging his own skepticism—“I woke up to a rumor that XRP supply could vanish overnight. Sounds crazy, right?”—before committing to test the thesis rather than dismiss it. He frames the exercise as an attempt to reconcile a long-standing critique (“XRP’s supply is too large for high prices”) with a rival view taking hold among prominent community voices: that much of the supply counted as “circulating” is effectively unavailable to trade. His first step is a straightforward data check. Pulling public figures, he finds CoinMarketCap showing roughly 59.6 billion XRP as circulating, while XRPScan reports about 64.7 billion. The divergence prompts what becomes the video’s key methodological point: different sources count “circulating” differently. Related Reading: Analyst Sounds Major XRP Warning: Last Chance To Get In As Accumulation Balloons As he explains it, the higher on-ledger number likely includes balances that aggregators exclude or treat as restricted, most notably Ripple’s programmatic escrow. He highlights that Ripple still “holds a chunk of XRP in escrow, about 35.3 billion XRP locked up across multiple wallets, with a nominal schedule of up to 1 billion released per month and unused portions commonly re-escrowed. Those coins exist and are accounted for on-ledger, but “they aren’t actually sitting on exchanges” and are not immediately available to buyers. In his words, “for all intents and purposes, that escrow stash is effectively off of the market.” From there, the analysis moves from headline “circulating supply” to the subtler concept of effective float. Beyond escrow, he argues that large strategic holders—banks, fintechs, or other whales—may sit on material balances without supplying order books. When you strip out escrow and these non-selling stashes, he says, “the effective circulating supply… is actually way smaller than the 59 or even 64 billion figure.” He cites community estimates in the “20 or 30 billion” range for what might be truly liquid at any given moment, while emphasizing that nobody has a precise number. That effective-float framing underpins the crux of his thesis: a potential supply shock if demand accelerates faster than fresh sell-side supply appears. “Price is a dance between supply and demand,” he says; if institutional or sovereign-scale users suddenly need XRP and “the market finds that there isn’t enough XRP readily available,” order books could thin out and prices could “shoot on up, sometimes violently.” His phrase “circulating supply could collapse overnight” is presented not as a claim that tokens are destroyed or removed from the ledger, but as a market-structure scenario in which available inventory to sell dries up quickly because holders won’t part with it. How Could The XRP Supply Shock Happen? On the demand side, he anchors the hypothetical to tokenization. He points to the “very early stages of something huge in finance”—on-chain tokenization of debt, stablecoins, CBDCs and even gold—and argues the XRP Ledger aims to be “the settlement layer” for those assets.He references Ripple CTO David Schwartz’s earlier comments about an XRPL pivot toward tokenized assets and notes that an institutional research shop (Bitwise) has framed XRP as a way to play the tokenization theme. In his construction, if “trillions of dollars in value” begin settling across XRPL rails, working inventories of XRP for bridging, liquidity and settlement could rise sharply, tightening effective float. Related Reading: XRP Bearish Signal: Whales Offload $486 Million In Asset To illustrate, he offers two analogies. First, the “concert tickets” model: you think there are 100,000 tickets (100B supply), but 50,000 are held by the promoter (escrow) and 30,000 by corporate buyers (whales), leaving only 20,000 for the public; if a million people want in, prices explode. Second, a comparison to Bitcoin’s halving: while XRP has no programmatic halving, he proposes that a sudden adoption wave could function like a de facto halving of available supply—“XRP’s version of a halving could actually be the adoption event.” He also updates the narrative context that long dogged XRP. Once derided for “too much supply,” he argues the script has “totally flipped.” He cites the current cycle’s optics—“XRP is sitting above $3 with a market cap north of around $180 billion”—as evidence that raw supply counts did not cap price as tightly as critics claimed, and as a backdrop for why a scarcity narrative is gaining traction. Still, he declines to publish targets or timelines, repeatedly stressing uncertainty and risk. “I’m not a financial adviser… cryptocurrencies are highly volatile,” he reminds viewers, adding that tokenization could take off “on some other platform,” unfold more slowly than enthusiasts expect, or fail to get to “sudden shock” scale. The verdict he offers is deliberately bound. The theory that “XRP supply could vanish overnight” is imprecise on its face; the ledger will not erase coins. But after examining dashboard methodologies, escrow mechanics and the behavior of large holders, he concludes that the effective float could be meaningfully smaller than headline supply figures, and that a fast-developing tokenization use case could, under the right conditions, stress that float. “Overnight is a dramatic way to put it,” he concedes. “The change could actually be very sudden when it comes.” At press time, XRP traded at $3.0198. Featured image created with DALL.E, chart from TradingView.com
Share
NewsBTC2025/09/18 11:00