Decentralized finance continues to grapple with a fundamental tension between transparency and privacy, but zero-knowledge proofs are changing the equation. ThisDecentralized finance continues to grapple with a fundamental tension between transparency and privacy, but zero-knowledge proofs are changing the equation. This

Privacy in DeFi: Emerging Projects Leveraging Zero-Knowledge Proofs

5 min read

Decentralized finance continues to grapple with a fundamental tension between transparency and privacy, but zero-knowledge proofs are changing the equation. This article examines four emerging projects that address confidentiality challenges in DeFi, drawing on insights from leading experts in cryptography and blockchain development. From concealing on-chain actions to enabling shielded institutional markets, these technologies represent practical solutions to real privacy barriers in decentralized systems.

  • Leverage Aztec For Concealed On-Chain Actions
  • Prove Legitimacy Via Zcash View Keys
  • Bridge Enterprises Through Penumbra Shielded Markets
  • Unlock Institutional Adoption With Programmable Confidentiality

Leverage Aztec For Concealed On-Chain Actions

Yes. One that stood out to me is Aztec Network, which focuses on bringing privacy to Ethereum-based DeFi using zero-knowledge proofs. What impressed me wasn’t just the tech, but how they applied it to real financial actions like private lending, swaps, and account balances without breaking composability.

In practice, this means users can interact with DeFi protocols without broadcasting their entire financial history to the world, which is a big deal if you’ve ever been front-run or had your wallet stalked on-chain (we’ve all been there).

The broader implication is trust and usability: privacy removes a major psychological and practical barrier for institutions and serious users who are uncomfortable operating in a fully transparent environment. It also reduces MEV-style attacks that thrive on visible transactions.

The challenge, of course, is balancing privacy with regulatory clarity and performance, but projects like Aztec show that privacy doesn’t have to mean isolation. If this model sticks, DeFi starts looking less like a public spreadsheet and more like an actual financial system.

Ahmed Yousuf, Financial Author & SEO Expert Manager, CoinTime

Prove Legitimacy Via Zcash View Keys

Zcash is an early, prime example of utilizing ZK-proofs, specifically zk-SNARKs, for the purpose of privacy. While many newer projects are focused on utilizing zk-rollups for scaling purposes, Zcash is primarily providing value in terms of shielding sender, receiver, and amount within a transaction, thereby directly answering the on-chain financial privacy and related demand, providing continued privacy beyond the default transparency of most public ledgers.

The key insight here is the weight of practical implications: operational and compliance-related friction for regulated financial use cases. True privacy does not play well with AML/KYC requirements, and for a DeFi project to be safely institutional-facing, it cannot provide just shielded transactions. It also must be the provider of a robust user-selective disclosure and audit service that allows the user to prove compliance to those that they need to prove it to, without deanonymising their entire financial history.

This bifurcates the ecosystem slightly. We see fully private protocols, focused on retail users, and on the other hand, we see the birth of hybrid or permissioned systems with view keys baked into the operations and guardrails from a reporting point of view for enterprises. The real challenge isn’t the proof itself, but creating a system that satisfies the user demand for privacy and the regulator demand for transparency.

Sudhanshu Dubey, Delivery Manager, Enterprise Solutions Architect, Errna

Bridge Enterprises Through Penumbra Shielded Markets

The most compelling privacy-first DeFi project right now is Penumbra (Cosmos). It’s a shielded, cross-chain network that leverages Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) to make swaps, staking, and transfers private by default. The key here isn’t just ‘hiding’; it’s about fixing market structure.

When balances and trade sizes are exposed in a public mempool, users pay a ‘transparency tax’ through front-running and MEV (Maximal Extractable Value). By shielding intent, Penumbra creates a more resilient market: less copy-trading, fewer targeted liquidations, and a fairer execution environment.

The second-order effect is the ‘Institutional Bridge.’ For traditional finance to move on-chain, confidentiality isn’t a feature—it’s a requirement. You can’t run a professional desk if the whole world can see your position before it’s even filled. The challenge, of course, is compliance. The winners in this space won’t be the ‘anarchy’ platforms, but the ones that pair ZK-privacy with selective disclosure—allowing users to remain private from the public while proving their provenance to regulators. In 2026, privacy is the prerequisite for real-world liquidity.

RUTAO XU, Founder & COO, TAOAPEX LTD

Unlock Institutional Adoption With Programmable Confidentiality

Stop looking at privacy mixers. Look at Aztec Network.

Current DeFi is broken for big players. It’s like playing poker with your cards face up. If an institution tries to move volume on a public ledger, MEV bots destroy their margins instantly.

Aztec uses ZK-rollups for “programmable privacy.” It encrypts the state, not just the token transfer.

The implication is simple: Business logic comes on-chain. Right now, no sane company puts their payroll or vendor contracts on Ethereum because it’s public. With ZK, you verify the math without revealing the data. That’s the bridge between “crypto casino” and real global finance.

Henry Ramirez, Editor-in-Chief, TECNOLOGIA GEEK

  • Web3 and Privacy: Examples of Projects That Put Users First – BlockTelegraph
  • How Does DeFi Enhance Transparency in Transactions?
  • Emerging DeFi Innovation: Projects Exceeding Expectations – BlockTelegraph
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny

The post Shocking OpenVPP Partnership Claim Draws Urgent Scrutiny appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with a recent controversy surrounding a bold OpenVPP partnership claim. This week, OpenVPP (OVPP) announced what it presented as a significant collaboration with the U.S. government in the innovative field of energy tokenization. However, this claim quickly drew the sharp eye of on-chain analyst ZachXBT, who highlighted a swift and official rebuttal that has sent ripples through the digital asset community. What Sparked the OpenVPP Partnership Claim Controversy? The core of the issue revolves around OpenVPP’s assertion of a U.S. government partnership. This kind of collaboration would typically be a monumental endorsement for any private cryptocurrency project, especially given the current regulatory climate. Such a partnership could signify a new era of mainstream adoption and legitimacy for energy tokenization initiatives. OpenVPP initially claimed cooperation with the U.S. government. This alleged partnership was said to be in the domain of energy tokenization. The announcement generated considerable interest and discussion online. ZachXBT, known for his diligent on-chain investigations, was quick to flag the development. He brought attention to the fact that U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Commissioner Hester Peirce had directly addressed the OpenVPP partnership claim. Her response, delivered within hours, was unequivocal and starkly contradicted OpenVPP’s narrative. How Did Regulatory Authorities Respond to the OpenVPP Partnership Claim? Commissioner Hester Peirce’s statement was a crucial turning point in this unfolding story. She clearly stated that the SEC, as an agency, does not engage in partnerships with private cryptocurrency projects. This response effectively dismantled the credibility of OpenVPP’s initial announcement regarding their supposed government collaboration. Peirce’s swift clarification underscores a fundamental principle of regulatory bodies: maintaining impartiality and avoiding endorsements of private entities. Her statement serves as a vital reminder to the crypto community about the official stance of government agencies concerning private ventures. Moreover, ZachXBT’s analysis…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:13
United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August

The post United States Building Permits Change dipped from previous -2.8% to -3.7% in August appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Information on these pages contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Markets and instruments profiled on this page are for informational purposes only and should not in any way come across as a recommendation to buy or sell in these assets. You should do your own thorough research before making any investment decisions. FXStreet does not in any way guarantee that this information is free from mistakes, errors, or material misstatements. It also does not guarantee that this information is of a timely nature. Investing in Open Markets involves a great deal of risk, including the loss of all or a portion of your investment, as well as emotional distress. All risks, losses and costs associated with investing, including total loss of principal, are your responsibility. The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of FXStreet nor its advertisers. The author will not be held responsible for information that is found at the end of links posted on this page. If not otherwise explicitly mentioned in the body of the article, at the time of writing, the author has no position in any stock mentioned in this article and no business relationship with any company mentioned. The author has not received compensation for writing this article, other than from FXStreet. FXStreet and the author do not provide personalized recommendations. The author makes no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information. FXStreet and the author will not be liable for any errors, omissions or any losses, injuries or damages arising from this information and its display or use. Errors and omissions excepted. The author and FXStreet are not registered investment advisors and nothing in this article is intended…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:20
CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October

The post CME Group to launch Solana and XRP futures options in October appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. CME Group is preparing to launch options on SOL and XRP futures next month, giving traders new ways to manage exposure to the two assets.  The contracts are set to go live on October 13, pending regulatory approval, and will come in both standard and micro sizes with expiries offered daily, monthly and quarterly. The new listings mark a major step for CME, which first brought bitcoin futures to market in 2017 and added ether contracts in 2021. Solana and XRP futures have quickly gained traction since their debut earlier this year. CME says more than 540,000 Solana contracts (worth about $22.3 billion), and 370,000 XRP contracts (worth $16.2 billion), have already been traded. Both products hit record trading activity and open interest in August. Market makers including Cumberland and FalconX plan to support the new contracts, arguing that institutional investors want hedging tools beyond bitcoin and ether. CME’s move also highlights the growing demand for regulated ways to access a broader set of digital assets. The launch, which still needs the green light from regulators, follows the end of XRP’s years-long legal fight with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. A federal court ruling in 2023 found that institutional sales of XRP violated securities laws, but programmatic exchange sales did not. The case officially closed in August 2025 after Ripple agreed to pay a $125 million fine, removing one of the biggest uncertainties hanging over the token. This is a developing story. This article was generated with the assistance of AI and reviewed by editor Jeffrey Albus before publication. Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters: Source: https://blockworks.co/news/cme-group-solana-xrp-futures
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/17 23:55