The post Bitcoin News: Netherlands Moves to Tax Unrealized Bitcoin Gains by 2028 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Netherlands plans Box 3 tax reform targetingThe post Bitcoin News: Netherlands Moves to Tax Unrealized Bitcoin Gains by 2028 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Netherlands plans Box 3 tax reform targeting

Bitcoin News: Netherlands Moves to Tax Unrealized Bitcoin Gains by 2028

Netherlands plans Box 3 tax reform targeting unrealized Bitcoin, stocks, and bond gains starting in 2028.

The Netherlands is preparing a major tax change affecting Bitcoin, stocks, bonds, and other investment assets. The taxes will be imposed on investors depending on the changes in the value of assets every year. Paper gains are required to be taxed to taxpayers even in the absence of selling holdings.

Dutch Parliament Pushes Box 3 Tax Reform Despite Investor Concerns

The reform comes after the parliamentary passing of the reform to reform the annual reporting of income tax processes under several classes of assets. Besides, legislators will introduce the use of tax on real investment performance per year instead of the presumed returns.

The new system is known as Wet werkelijk rendement Box 3 that is expected to be fully implemented in 2028. In this structure, taxes will be based on the differences in the values of assets as well as income received annually.

Related Reading: Dutch Central Bank Fines OKX €2.25M for Unlicensed Operations | Live Bitcoin News

Consequently, the realized and unrealized gains will fall under taxation in the new system. As a result, Bitcoin users and conventional assets investors will be subject to similar yearly requirements. Such an alignment is a major structural policy change.

The proposal came about following the decisions of the courts to rule out Box 3 taxes based on fictitious returns over the past years. In this regard, the government proceeded to enforce adherence to the standard of judicial principles and constitutional fair play.

The revised Box 3 system was again debated in a recent parliamentary session by the Tweede Kamer. During the discussions, lawmakers sent more than 130 questions to the State Secretary Eugene Heijnen.

The issue of complexity and liquidity pressure on investors who have to pay taxes annually were raised by many parliamentarians. Nevertheless, postponing the reform is estimated to cost the treasury about 2.3 billion a year.

Heijnen admitted these issues in parliamentary debate sessions, by emphasising that taxation is only applied to real profits, by administrative limits. However, he affirmed that taxing payouts solely will not work by the year 2028.

Political Support Expands as Fiscal Pressure Outweighs Policy Doubts

The allies of the reform are VVD, CDA, JA21, BBB, and PVV in several votes of parliament. Moreover, both D66 and GroenLinks-PvdA stated that it would support the revised Box 3 framework. These parties constitute a governing majority.

Left-wing parties prefer the idea of taxing unrealized profits and have practical reasons to support the need to do so. They claim the method does not leave huge revenue gaps and makes the administration processes much easier.

GroenLinks-PvdA legislator Luc Stultiens stressed the equity of taxation on increased capital gains in a progressive manner. Thus, the new system is likely to have more effective tax burdens on wealthier investors.

The new Box 3 regime that has deductibles would be advantageous to real estate investors. The costs will decrease taxable profits and increase relative asset treatment as opposed to the present system.

Moreover, it will not tax property investors until they make profits at the end of every year. The new rules will, however, impose an extra levy on personal use of a second home.

On the whole, the reform is a positive sign of transitioning to taxation of annual Bitcoin gains and other assets. This means that long-term planning strategies need to be changed by Dutch investors. The heightened complication will have implications on the annual liability of taxpayers.

Source: https://www.livebitcoinnews.com/netherlands-moves-to-tax-unrealized-bitcoin-gains-by-2028/

Market Opportunity
GAINS Logo
GAINS Price(GAINS)
$0.0123
$0.0123$0.0123
-0.64%
USD
GAINS (GAINS) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Ripple (XRP) CEO Brad Garlinghouse Makes Another Statement Regarding the Anticipated US Cryptocurrency Legislation

Ripple (XRP) CEO Brad Garlinghouse Makes Another Statement Regarding the Anticipated US Cryptocurrency Legislation

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, in his latest statement, once again expressed his support for the cryptocurrency legislation being debated in the US. Continue Reading
Share
Coinstats2026/01/22 05:30
Trump Dismisses Stock Market Dip as Minor While Solana and XRP Stand to Gain

Trump Dismisses Stock Market Dip as Minor While Solana and XRP Stand to Gain

Trump calls stock market dip “peanuts” and predicts big gains for Solana and XRP, despite recent market volatility and geopolitical tensions. President Donald Trump
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/01/22 06:00