TLDR USD1 proposal passed as top wallets dominated WLFI governance votes Locked WLFI holders were excluded from a vote shaping protocol direction Nine wallets controlledTLDR USD1 proposal passed as top wallets dominated WLFI governance votes Locked WLFI holders were excluded from a vote shaping protocol direction Nine wallets controlled

USD1 Growth Proposal Triggers Claims of WLFI Value Extraction

TLDR

  • USD1 proposal passed as top wallets dominated WLFI governance votes
  • Locked WLFI holders were excluded from a vote shaping protocol direction
  • Nine wallets controlled nearly 59% of total voting power
  • Revenue flows bypass WLFI holders as USD1 expansion accelerates
  • Rising emissions and dilution fears pressure WLFI market outlook

World Liberty Financial faced renewed scrutiny after the USD1 proposal passed through governance despite restricted participation. The vote advanced while many WLFI holders remained unable to access locked tokens. Critics argued that USD1 now sits at the center of decisions that reduce token holder influence.

USD1 Proposal Advances Despite Voting Access Concerns

The governance outcome pushed the USD1 plan forward and highlighted the voting imbalance within the WLFI structure. The largest wallets cast decisive votes and shifted the final tally with concentrated power. Furthermore, onchain data suggested that team-linked and partner-linked wallets controlled most voting weight.

The top nine wallets accounted for nearly 59% of total power and secured the USD1 proposal’s approval. They shaped the final outcome and overshadowed the votes of smaller participants.  The largest wallet represented more than 18% of the voting snapshot.

Many WLFI holders stayed locked since the token generation event and could not participate. Their allocations remained inaccessible and restricted by project rules. Critics argued that these holders could not influence decisions affecting USD1 expansion.

USD1 Plan Raises New Questions About WLFI Token Utility

The USD1 roadmap increased concerns about WLFI’s benefits and long-term structure. Critics questioned why governance advanced USD1 growth instead of prioritizing unlock mechanisms for WLFI. They argued that USD1 incentives could draw from treasury assets rather than WLFI emissions.

Background documents indicated that revenue distribution excludes WLFI holders completely. The Gold Paper stated that protocol revenue flows to Trump-linked and Witkoff-linked entities. Thus, attention turned to whether the USD1 proposal strengthens internal interests rather than WLFI’s ecosystem.

WLFI holds a treasury of major digital assets including Bitcoin, Ether, and Chainlink. These assets have grown under previous strategies and remain controlled by the project. WLFI holders gain no direct participation from these reserves, which fueled frustration around the USD1 expansion.

USD1 Expansion Follows Fresh Token Movements and Growing Emissions

Large transfers occurred after the vote and signaled new activity around WLFI circulation. A transaction of 500 million WLFI moved to Jump Trading and intensified debate around emissions. Critics stated that locked holders still lacked clarity about future access to their tokens.

WLFI allocated 33.5% of supply to the team and 5.85% to partners. These groups secured significant influence in governance and shaped USD1 alignment strategies. The public sale accounted for a smaller share and held limited voting impact.

The market reacted to increasing WLFI emissions and ongoing USD1 expansion efforts. Participants expressed concern about long-term dilution and structural extraction claims. As a result, projections suggested continued downward pressure on WLFI as the USD1 agenda advances.

The post USD1 Growth Proposal Triggers Claims of WLFI Value Extraction appeared first on CoinCentral.

Market Opportunity
WLFI Logo
WLFI Price(WLFI)
$0.1661
$0.1661$0.1661
-2.29%
USD
WLFI (WLFI) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now?

The post Is Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX) a strong mutual fund pick right now? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. On the lookout for a Sector – Tech fund? Starting with Putnam Global Technology A (PGTAX – Free Report) should not be a possibility at this time. PGTAX possesses a Zacks Mutual Fund Rank of 4 (Sell), which is based on various forecasting factors like size, cost, and past performance. Objective We note that PGTAX is a Sector – Tech option, and this area is loaded with many options. Found in a wide number of industries such as semiconductors, software, internet, and networking, tech companies are everywhere. Thus, Sector – Tech mutual funds that invest in technology let investors own a stake in a notoriously volatile sector, but with a much more diversified approach. History of fund/manager Putnam Funds is based in Canton, MA, and is the manager of PGTAX. The Putnam Global Technology A made its debut in January of 2009 and PGTAX has managed to accumulate roughly $650.01 million in assets, as of the most recently available information. The fund is currently managed by Di Yao who has been in charge of the fund since December of 2012. Performance Obviously, what investors are looking for in these funds is strong performance relative to their peers. PGTAX has a 5-year annualized total return of 14.46%, and is in the middle third among its category peers. But if you are looking for a shorter time frame, it is also worth looking at its 3-year annualized total return of 27.02%, which places it in the middle third during this time-frame. It is important to note that the product’s returns may not reflect all its expenses. Any fees not reflected would lower the returns. Total returns do not reflect the fund’s [%] sale charge. If sales charges were included, total returns would have been lower. When looking at a fund’s performance, it…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 04:05
QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21

The post QNT Technical Analysis Jan 21 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. QNT’s MACD histogram showing a positive trend and RSI stabilizing in the neutral zone
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/21 23:54
SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important?

The post SHIB Alert: First Three-Hour Death Cross Flashes on Chart in 2026, Is It Important? appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Shiba Inu is forming a death cross
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/01/22 00:26