The post Truebit Protocol hack blamed on contract price calculation misconfiguration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The SlowMist blockchain security outfitThe post Truebit Protocol hack blamed on contract price calculation misconfiguration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The SlowMist blockchain security outfit

Truebit Protocol hack blamed on contract price calculation misconfiguration

The SlowMist blockchain security outfit shared its report of the audit on the hack that drained $26 million from the Truebit Protocol. 

According to the report, the root cause of the attack was that the addition operation in the numerator of the Purchase contract’s price calculation did not use the SafeMath library for overflow protection. 

How did the Truebit hack happen? 

SlowMist’s audit report revealed that Truebit’s contract was reportedly compiled with Solidity 0.6.10, and the native + operator does not include overflow checks. The attacker was able to wreak so much havoc by crafting a specific minting amount, which triggered the addition operation to exceed the maximum value of uint256 and wrap around. 

The function made the Price = 0, enabling near-zero-cost token minting and arbitrage, which the hacker quickly took advantage of to drain 8,535 ETH (~$26.44 million). The report ended with advice from the SlowMist team. 

“The SlowMist security team recommends that for contracts compiled with Solidity versions below 0.8.0, developers should ensure that all arithmetic operations are protected using the SafeMath library to prevent logic vulnerabilities caused by integer overflows,” it read. 

The Truebit team has acknowledged the hack, identifying the affected smart contract and advising the public to avoid interacting with it until further notice. 

“We are in contact with law enforcement and taking all available measures to address the situation. We will share updates through our official channels as they become available,” they claimed. 

One day later, the team claimed to be working hard to address the incident and that it had “engaged additional resources to strengthen tracing and recovery,” while promising updates through official channels.

In the comments section of the post, community members offered various next steps to the team, with a majority claiming the protocol had become unusable, that it was unlikely they would recover the funds, and needed to admit that. 

Commentators have noted that full recovery could be impossible. 

The $TRU token is still down 100% with zero percentage change and virtually no trading volume reported across major platforms since the hack, which reflects a complete lack of faith in the potential of the project to bounce back.

Truebit hack gave Uniswap brief boost 

Cryptopolitan reported on January 8 that Uniswap recorded over $1.4 million in daily trading fee capture revenue, the highest the platform has ever recorded since it was established. 

However, that record number came with a caveat. According to a Dune dashboard created by an analyst named Marcov, nearly $1.3 million of those fees came directly from trades related to Truebit’s TRU token. 

Marcov has now filtered out those values from the live dashboard because the token value has dropped to zero and won’t be claimed and used to burn UNI.

Want your project in front of crypto’s top minds? Feature it in our next industry report, where data meets impact.

Source: https://www.cryptopolitan.com/truebit-protocol-hack-price-misconfiguration/

Market Opportunity
The Root Network Logo
The Root Network Price(ROOT)
$0.000211
$0.000211$0.000211
+0.95%
USD
The Root Network (ROOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09
Ripple (XRP) CEO Brad Garlinghouse Makes Another Statement Regarding the Anticipated US Cryptocurrency Legislation

Ripple (XRP) CEO Brad Garlinghouse Makes Another Statement Regarding the Anticipated US Cryptocurrency Legislation

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, in his latest statement, once again expressed his support for the cryptocurrency legislation being debated in the US. Continue Reading
Share
Coinstats2026/01/22 05:30
Trump Dismisses Stock Market Dip as Minor While Solana and XRP Stand to Gain

Trump Dismisses Stock Market Dip as Minor While Solana and XRP Stand to Gain

Trump calls stock market dip “peanuts” and predicts big gains for Solana and XRP, despite recent market volatility and geopolitical tensions. President Donald Trump
Share
LiveBitcoinNews2026/01/22 06:00