The post Time To Update Your Priors: Natural Gas Is Expensive appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. When fracking spread across our country in the early 2000s, it ushered in an era of cheap gas and fundamentally changed the American energy landscape. Gas toppled coal to become the dominant source of electricity generation in the country–– and the United States became the world’s largest natural gas producer. However, we’ve gotten so used to the idea of cheap natural gas that we’re failing to reassess whether that narrative is still true. The data is increasingly telling us it isn’t – we’re now the world’s largest natural gas exporter and natural gas power plants are far more expensive to build – both of which force Americans to pay more for power. That means we risk locking ourselves into expensive decisions with decades-long consequences. The fracking revolution began nearly 20 years ago—today’s reality is different. If government officials and utility executives still think we’re in the era of cheap natural gas, their decisions will be driven by outdated knowledge, and they won’t be able to fight rising power prices if they invest in the wrong technology. View of the Lusk fracking facility in Scenery Hill, Pennsylvania, on October 22, 2020. – There are many complexities around the debate over fracking that is center stage during the 2020 US presidential election, even as some residents of the country’s most heavily fracked region have soured on an industry that had promised economic revival. (Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM / AFP) (Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Natural gas prices face upward pressure on two fronts Soaring data center electricity demand has sent utilities scrambling to add new sources of electricity to the grid. In places like Virginia, ground-zero for the data center surge and home to roughly 20% of the world’s data centers, the gas industry is shouting… The post Time To Update Your Priors: Natural Gas Is Expensive appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. When fracking spread across our country in the early 2000s, it ushered in an era of cheap gas and fundamentally changed the American energy landscape. Gas toppled coal to become the dominant source of electricity generation in the country–– and the United States became the world’s largest natural gas producer. However, we’ve gotten so used to the idea of cheap natural gas that we’re failing to reassess whether that narrative is still true. The data is increasingly telling us it isn’t – we’re now the world’s largest natural gas exporter and natural gas power plants are far more expensive to build – both of which force Americans to pay more for power. That means we risk locking ourselves into expensive decisions with decades-long consequences. The fracking revolution began nearly 20 years ago—today’s reality is different. If government officials and utility executives still think we’re in the era of cheap natural gas, their decisions will be driven by outdated knowledge, and they won’t be able to fight rising power prices if they invest in the wrong technology. View of the Lusk fracking facility in Scenery Hill, Pennsylvania, on October 22, 2020. – There are many complexities around the debate over fracking that is center stage during the 2020 US presidential election, even as some residents of the country’s most heavily fracked region have soured on an industry that had promised economic revival. (Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM / AFP) (Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Natural gas prices face upward pressure on two fronts Soaring data center electricity demand has sent utilities scrambling to add new sources of electricity to the grid. In places like Virginia, ground-zero for the data center surge and home to roughly 20% of the world’s data centers, the gas industry is shouting…

Time To Update Your Priors: Natural Gas Is Expensive

2025/12/07 20:31

When fracking spread across our country in the early 2000s, it ushered in an era of cheap gas and fundamentally changed the American energy landscape. Gas toppled coal to become the dominant source of electricity generation in the country–– and the United States became the world’s largest natural gas producer.

However, we’ve gotten so used to the idea of cheap natural gas that we’re failing to reassess whether that narrative is still true. The data is increasingly telling us it isn’t – we’re now the world’s largest natural gas exporter and natural gas power plants are far more expensive to build – both of which force Americans to pay more for power. That means we risk locking ourselves into expensive decisions with decades-long consequences.

The fracking revolution began nearly 20 years ago—today’s reality is different. If government officials and utility executives still think we’re in the era of cheap natural gas, their decisions will be driven by outdated knowledge, and they won’t be able to fight rising power prices if they invest in the wrong technology.

View of the Lusk fracking facility in Scenery Hill, Pennsylvania, on October 22, 2020. – There are many complexities around the debate over fracking that is center stage during the 2020 US presidential election, even as some residents of the country’s most heavily fracked region have soured on an industry that had promised economic revival. (Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM / AFP) (Photo by NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP via Getty Images)

AFP via Getty Images

Natural gas prices face upward pressure on two fronts

Soaring data center electricity demand has sent utilities scrambling to add new sources of electricity to the grid. In places like Virginia, ground-zero for the data center surge and home to roughly 20% of the world’s data centers, the gas industry is shouting from the rooftops that gas is needed to meet this new demand while keeping costs low.

That premise is wrong on multiple levels.

First, it’s essentially impossible to build a new gas-fired power plant by the end of this decade. Gas turbine manufacturers like GE Vernova, Siemens Energy, and Mitsubishi scaled back their production capabilities years ago when new turbine orders were few and far between. As a result, power producers trying to source new turbines face wait times of five to seven years.

Second, much of the workforce that built the surge of gas infrastructure in the 2000s and 2010s has either retired or moved on to other industries, creating a deep workforce shortage. If utilities want to build a new gas plant, it’ll be years before they can get the equipment, and even then, it’s hard to find workers to build it—but we need the power now, not in 2030. That means new gas-fired power plants will be dramatically more expensive this time around.

NextEra CEO John Ketchum says building a new gas-fired power plant today would cost three times as much as the last facility the utility built, back in 2022.

And that’s only half of the equation—once the facility is built, you need fuel to run it. Turns out, that’s drastically more expensive now too.

The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecasts natural gas prices will rise 14% in 2026, following a 59% year-over-year increase from 2024 to 2025. EIA attributes rising prices to increased demand stemming from rising liquified natural gas (LNG) exports and flat production capabilities.

“Gas is only going to get more expensive going forward,” said Tyson Slocum, director of Public Citizen’s energy program. “You can build more pipelines in Virginia or anywhere else, but that extra natural gas is still going to be competing with folks in Berlin and Beijing for access to the U.S. gas.”

“LNG is tying us more to global markets that pay more than we do for gas,” said Joshua Rhodes, a research scientist at the University of Texas, Austin. “That has to put more upward pressure on gas.”

PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS – FEBRUARY 10: An aerial view of a cargo ship passing by the Cheniere Energy liquefied natural gas plant on February 10, 2025 in Port Arthur, Texas. China, the world’s largest importer of liquefied natural gas, has announced that it will be placing a 15% tariff on U.S. liquefied natural gas in retaliation to President Trump’s ruling to impose tariffs on Chinese commodities. (Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

Getty Images

Like any other commodity that’s sold across the world, gas companies seek the highest-priced markets. These companies say American natural gas increases our domestic energy security, but they don’t care about home heating bills, they just want to make the highest possible profit – even if that means selling our gas to countries like China.

And yet, Energy Secretary Chris Wright wants to double LNG exports within five years, and then double them again. LNG exports already increased 25% between 2024 and 2025.

Expensive natural gas prices hit households with a double whammy

Because natural gas is the largest source of U.S. electricity generation, when the fuel gets more expensive, it forces consumers to pay higher electricity bills. In fact, every region of the country has seen electricity prices increase over the last three years.

Electricity prices have increased across every region of the country.

U.S. Energy Information Administration

Wholesale electricity prices spiked 23% in 2025, and EIA predicts they’ll climb another 8.6% in 2026. “Natural gas prices tend to be the biggest determinant of power prices,” according to EIA.

But it’s not just electricity bills that are causing sticker shock—the majority of homes in the U.S. use natural gas to heat them, so as gas prices rise, so too will home heating bills. Indeed, EIA is forecasting that home heating costs will rise next year. Federal Reserve data shows retail gas utility service has risen 11% over the past year, near an all-time high. That means more expensive home heating bills for families this winter, potentially fueling the 8% increase in home heating costs expected this year.

Americans are already struggling to pay their utility bills—1 in 20 households has a utility debt high enough to be sent to a collection agency, and average monthly energy bills have increased 35% since 2022, according to a recent report.

Fortunately, rapidly growing wind, solar, and storage can help keep costs in check and can be deployed quickly to meet growing electricity demand. Wind and solar are the cheapest sources of new electricity, and they’ve gotten exponentially cheaper over the past decade– 91% of new renewable power projects commissioned last year were more affordable than new fossil fuels, according to the International Renewable Energy Agency.

And renewables and battery storage are essentially the only new sources of electricity being added to the U.S. grid right now, comprising over 90% of new capacity in 2025 and 2024. The truth is that states with the highest levels of wind and solar generation like Iowa, Oklahoma, and New Mexico have had the lowest utility bill rate increases in America, Energy Innovation research finds.

If policymakers rely on natural gas as a solution for the energy affordability crisis, they will fail to protect American families and businesses from higher energy prices.

Source: https://www.forbes.com/sites/energyinnovation/2025/12/07/time-to-update-your-priors-natural-gas-is-expensive/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

The post Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is making another attempt to break the downtrend that has kept the crypto king capped since late October. Price is hovering near $91,000 as investors watch a rare shift in market structure unfold.  For the first time in more than two and a half years, short-term holders have surpassed long-term holders in realized profits, creating both opportunities and risks for BTC. Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin Sees Some Shift The MVRV Long/Short Difference highlights a notable change in Bitcoin’s profit distribution. A positive reading usually signals long-term holders hold more unrealized gains, while a negative value indicates short-term holders are ahead. In Bitcoin’s case, the difference has dipped into negative territory for the first time since March 2023. This marks 30 months since short-term holders last led in profits. Such dominance raises concerns because short-term holders tend to sell aggressively when volatility increases. Their profit-taking behavior could add pressure on BTC’s price if the broader market weakens, especially during attempts to break the downtrend. Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. Bitcoin MVRV Long/Short Difference. Source: Santiment Sponsored Sponsored Despite this shift, Bitcoin’s broader momentum shows encouraging signs. Exchange net position change data confirms rising outflows across major platforms, signaling a shift in investor accumulation. BTC leaving exchanges is often treated as a bullish indicator, reflecting confidence in long-term appreciation. This trend suggests that many traders view the $90,000 range as a reasonable bottom zone and are preparing for a potential recovery. Sustained outflows support price stability and strengthen the probability of BTC breaking above immediate resistance levels. Bitcoin Exchange Net Position Change. Source: Glassnode BTC Price Is Trying Its Best Bitcoin is trading at $91,330 at the time of writing, positioned just below the $91,521 resistance. Reclaiming this level and flipping it into support…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 05:57
OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

The post OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The successful stock market debut of Moore Threads, a company that’s being touted as China’s answer to Nvidia, has been overshadowed by resurfaced allegations that link one of its co-founders to an unpaid cryptocurrency debt that has been lingering for roughly a decade. Shares in the GPU maker skyrocketed to as much as 470% on Thursday following its initial public offering (IPO) on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, valuing the company at around RMB 282 billion ($39.9 billion). However, as the success was being celebrated online, a social media post revived claims that Moore Threads’ co-founder Li Feng borrowed 1,500 Bitcoins from Mingxing “Star” Xu, founder and CEO of cryptocurrency exchange OKX, and never repaid the loan. Crypto past with OKX founder resurfaces In an X post, AB Kuai.Dong referenced Feng’s involvement in a 2017 initial coin offering that raised 5,000 ETH alongside controversial angel investor Xue Manzi. Feng allegedly dismissed the Bitcoin loan, stating, “It was just that Xu Mingxing’s investment in me had failed.” Xu responded to the post with a conciliatory message, writing, “People cannot always remain in the shadow of negative history. Face the future and contribute more positive energy.” He added, “Let the legal system handle the debt issue,” and offered blessings to every entrepreneur. Feng reportedly partnered with Xue Manzi and Li Xiaolai in 2017 to launch Malego Coin, which was later renamed Alpaca Coin MGD. The project reportedly raised approximately 5,000 ETH, but it was around this period that China banned ICOs, allowing regulators to crack down on what they viewed as speculative excess and potential fraud in the cryptocurrency sector. The Bitcoin loan dispute appears separate from the ICO controversy. According to sources familiar with the matter, the original loan agreement was dated December 17, 2014, with an expiry of December 16, 2016.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 06:13