THE Department of Energy (DoE) is reviewing renewable energy (RE) projects awarded under the open and competitive selection process (OCSP) to accelerate development and improve implementation efficiency, officials said. “We are… reviewing whether OCSP projects are actually being implemented,” Energy Undersecretary Mylene C. Capongcol told reporters on the sidelines of a dialogue organized by Clean, […]THE Department of Energy (DoE) is reviewing renewable energy (RE) projects awarded under the open and competitive selection process (OCSP) to accelerate development and improve implementation efficiency, officials said. “We are… reviewing whether OCSP projects are actually being implemented,” Energy Undersecretary Mylene C. Capongcol told reporters on the sidelines of a dialogue organized by Clean, […]

Philippine Energy dep’t reviewing renewable energy agreements to boost project rollout

2025/12/03 21:08

THE Department of Energy (DoE) is reviewing renewable energy (RE) projects awarded under the open and competitive selection process (OCSP) to accelerate development and improve implementation efficiency, officials said.

“We are… reviewing whether OCSP projects are actually being implemented,” Energy Undersecretary Mylene C. Capongcol told reporters on the sidelines of a dialogue organized by Clean, Affordable, and Secure Energy for Southeast Asia on Wednesday. “We’re having it reviewed to determine the best way to accelerate and make it more efficient.”

The OCSP allows the DoE to award RE contracts in pre-determined areas through competitive bidding. These are locations identified as having high potential for renewable energy development, including hydro, geothermal and wind resources.

The government last ran an OCSP in 2023, receiving 25 bids across these technologies.

Ms. Capongcol noted that many contracts offered under OCSP come from projects that were terminated, relinquished or surrendered by developers. The review aims to ensure these areas are efficiently redeployed to meet the country’s RE targets.

In a draft terms of reference for the fifth round of OCSP, the DoE identified 11 pre-determined areas nationwide for potential RE projects.

Seven sites are earmarked for hydropower, with a combined capacity of 37.4 megawatts (MW). Two geothermal projects, with a potential capacity of 68 MW, are also proposed, while two wind projects are in the pipeline, though their capacity is still being assessed.

To date, the DoE has awarded more than 1,500 RE service contracts, representing about 130 gigawatts of potential capacity.

These projects are critical to raising the share of renewables in the national power mix to 35% by 2030 and 50% by 2040. RE generation now accounts for about 22% of total electricity.

Ms. Capongcol said projects awarded through OCSP and the rising adoption of distributed energy resources are expected to help the Philippines reach these targets.

The review also seeks to identify bottlenecks in project deployment, ensuring that renewable projects progress on schedule and contribute to grid reliability.

The DoE’s focus on OCSP underscores the government’s push to meet growing energy demand while reducing dependence on fossil fuels.

By streamlining existing contracts and accelerating development in pre-determined areas, Manila hopes to bolster renewable generation, attract private-sector investment and advance its climate and energy transition goals. — S.J. Talavera

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For

The post The Channel Factories We’ve Been Waiting For appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Visions of future technology are often prescient about the broad strokes while flubbing the details. The tablets in “2001: A Space Odyssey” do indeed look like iPads, but you never see the astronauts paying for subscriptions or wasting hours on Candy Crush.  Channel factories are one vision that arose early in the history of the Lightning Network to address some challenges that Lightning has faced from the beginning. Despite having grown to become Bitcoin’s most successful layer-2 scaling solution, with instant and low-fee payments, Lightning’s scale is limited by its reliance on payment channels. Although Lightning shifts most transactions off-chain, each payment channel still requires an on-chain transaction to open and (usually) another to close. As adoption grows, pressure on the blockchain grows with it. The need for a more scalable approach to managing channels is clear. Channel factories were supposed to meet this need, but where are they? In 2025, subnetworks are emerging that revive the impetus of channel factories with some new details that vastly increase their potential. They are natively interoperable with Lightning and achieve greater scale by allowing a group of participants to open a shared multisig UTXO and create multiple bilateral channels, which reduces the number of on-chain transactions and improves capital efficiency. Achieving greater scale by reducing complexity, Ark and Spark perform the same function as traditional channel factories with new designs and additional capabilities based on shared UTXOs.  Channel Factories 101 Channel factories have been around since the inception of Lightning. A factory is a multiparty contract where multiple users (not just two, as in a Dryja-Poon channel) cooperatively lock funds in a single multisig UTXO. They can open, close and update channels off-chain without updating the blockchain for each operation. Only when participants leave or the factory dissolves is an on-chain transaction…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 00:09