Irys, a layer-1 blockchain listed on major exchanges including Coinbase, is under scrutiny after a single entity captured roughly 20% of its airdrop allocation. On November 28, blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps said it identified about 900 wallets involved in the process. IRYS Slides After 900 Linked Wallets Take $4 Million in Airdrop Tokens According to the firm, these addresses showed no prior on-chain activity. It described the pattern as consistent with coordinated preparation rather than organic network participation. Following the distribution, the cluster network began consolidating the assets. Data shows that roughly 500 of the identified wallets transferred their IRYS allocations to intermediary addresses before routing the funds to Bitget, a centralized exchange. IRYS Token Address Clusters. Source: BubbleMaps The flow of tokens, valued at approximately $4 million, indicates a likely preparation to liquidate the position. Such a move could introduce significant sell-side pressure on the asset’s order book. IRYS price has come under pressure following the disclosures. The token has declined 16% over the past 24 hours and is trading near $0.032 as of press time. Bubblemaps noted that it found no on-chain evidence linking the IRYS team to the wallet cluster. Irys markets itself as an “on-chain AWS” designed for data storage and smart-contract execution. The protocol has raised more than $13 million from venture capital investors and listed its token this week on major exchanges, including Binance and Coinbase. Crypto Needs Stronger Sybil Protection The episode highlights a structural challenge facing crypto projects that rely on airdrops to expand ownership. Indeed, Irys allocated 8% of its total supply to the event. The goal was to distribute tokens to early users and help decentralize the network. Instead, the concentration of tokens in a single cluster shows how airdrops remain vulnerable to actors using large batches of script-generated wallets to capture outsized allocations. When one entity controls 20% of the initial circulating float, market observers say the result is heightened centralization risk and distorted price discovery. Meanwhile, incidents like this point to broader limitations in token distribution practices across permissionless ecosystems. These environments have minimal identity checks and unrestricted network access. This IRYS episode shows how difficult it is to prevent coordinated airdrop capture without stronger filtering, better identity heuristics, or more robust pre-distribution reviews. Without those safeguards, early liquidity events can disproportionately benefit short-term actors. That dynamic can weaken outcomes for long-term holders and overall network stability.Irys, a layer-1 blockchain listed on major exchanges including Coinbase, is under scrutiny after a single entity captured roughly 20% of its airdrop allocation. On November 28, blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps said it identified about 900 wallets involved in the process. IRYS Slides After 900 Linked Wallets Take $4 Million in Airdrop Tokens According to the firm, these addresses showed no prior on-chain activity. It described the pattern as consistent with coordinated preparation rather than organic network participation. Following the distribution, the cluster network began consolidating the assets. Data shows that roughly 500 of the identified wallets transferred their IRYS allocations to intermediary addresses before routing the funds to Bitget, a centralized exchange. IRYS Token Address Clusters. Source: BubbleMaps The flow of tokens, valued at approximately $4 million, indicates a likely preparation to liquidate the position. Such a move could introduce significant sell-side pressure on the asset’s order book. IRYS price has come under pressure following the disclosures. The token has declined 16% over the past 24 hours and is trading near $0.032 as of press time. Bubblemaps noted that it found no on-chain evidence linking the IRYS team to the wallet cluster. Irys markets itself as an “on-chain AWS” designed for data storage and smart-contract execution. The protocol has raised more than $13 million from venture capital investors and listed its token this week on major exchanges, including Binance and Coinbase. Crypto Needs Stronger Sybil Protection The episode highlights a structural challenge facing crypto projects that rely on airdrops to expand ownership. Indeed, Irys allocated 8% of its total supply to the event. The goal was to distribute tokens to early users and help decentralize the network. Instead, the concentration of tokens in a single cluster shows how airdrops remain vulnerable to actors using large batches of script-generated wallets to capture outsized allocations. When one entity controls 20% of the initial circulating float, market observers say the result is heightened centralization risk and distorted price discovery. Meanwhile, incidents like this point to broader limitations in token distribution practices across permissionless ecosystems. These environments have minimal identity checks and unrestricted network access. This IRYS episode shows how difficult it is to prevent coordinated airdrop capture without stronger filtering, better identity heuristics, or more robust pre-distribution reviews. Without those safeguards, early liquidity events can disproportionately benefit short-term actors. That dynamic can weaken outcomes for long-term holders and overall network stability.

Irys Airdrop Draws Concern After One Entity Captures 20% of Supply

2025/11/30 01:50

Irys, a layer-1 blockchain listed on major exchanges including Coinbase, is under scrutiny after a single entity captured roughly 20% of its airdrop allocation.

On November 28, blockchain analytics firm Bubblemaps said it identified about 900 wallets involved in the process.

IRYS Slides After 900 Linked Wallets Take $4 Million in Airdrop Tokens

According to the firm, these addresses showed no prior on-chain activity. It described the pattern as consistent with coordinated preparation rather than organic network participation.

Following the distribution, the cluster network began consolidating the assets.

Data shows that roughly 500 of the identified wallets transferred their IRYS allocations to intermediary addresses before routing the funds to Bitget, a centralized exchange.

IRYS Token Address Clusters. Source: BubbleMaps

The flow of tokens, valued at approximately $4 million, indicates a likely preparation to liquidate the position. Such a move could introduce significant sell-side pressure on the asset’s order book.

IRYS price has come under pressure following the disclosures. The token has declined 16% over the past 24 hours and is trading near $0.032 as of press time.

Bubblemaps noted that it found no on-chain evidence linking the IRYS team to the wallet cluster.

Irys markets itself as an “on-chain AWS” designed for data storage and smart-contract execution.

The protocol has raised more than $13 million from venture capital investors and listed its token this week on major exchanges, including Binance and Coinbase.

Crypto Needs Stronger Sybil Protection

The episode highlights a structural challenge facing crypto projects that rely on airdrops to expand ownership.

Indeed, Irys allocated 8% of its total supply to the event. The goal was to distribute tokens to early users and help decentralize the network.

Instead, the concentration of tokens in a single cluster shows how airdrops remain vulnerable to actors using large batches of script-generated wallets to capture outsized allocations.

When one entity controls 20% of the initial circulating float, market observers say the result is heightened centralization risk and distorted price discovery.

Meanwhile, incidents like this point to broader limitations in token distribution practices across permissionless ecosystems. These environments have minimal identity checks and unrestricted network access.

This IRYS episode shows how difficult it is to prevent coordinated airdrop capture without stronger filtering, better identity heuristics, or more robust pre-distribution reviews.

Without those safeguards, early liquidity events can disproportionately benefit short-term actors. That dynamic can weaken outcomes for long-term holders and overall network stability.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

South Korea Revisits Crypto Exchange Liability Amid Hacking Risks

South Korea Revisits Crypto Exchange Liability Amid Hacking Risks

The post South Korea Revisits Crypto Exchange Liability Amid Hacking Risks appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Points: South Korea considers no-fault liability for virtual asset exchanges. Legislation aims to enhance operator accountability in cyber attacks. Pending fines could reach 3% of sales for hacking cases. South Korea’s Financial Services Commission is contemplating imposing no-fault liability on virtual asset operators for hacking-related damages, according to a Yonhap News Agency report on December 7. This potential legislation aligns virtual asset operators with financial institutions, impacting regulatory dynamics and market stability in South Korea’s evolving crypto sector. South Korea Targets Crypto Exchanges with 3% Sales Fines The Financial Services Commission (FSC) of South Korea is considering adding a clause to its draft legislation, imposing no-fault liability on virtual asset operators. This move follows a series of 20 computer incidents on top Korean won exchanges, emphasizing the need for enhanced security measures. The FSC aims to align virtual asset exchange liabilities with those of financial companies. South Korean lawmakers are debating stricter penalties, with proposed fines reaching 3% of sales revenue, paralleling measures in the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. Current maximum fines are capped at 5 billion won. This legislative shift reflects the government’s commitment to improving user protection and response strategies in the crypto sector. Industry reactions have been mixed. While there has been no official statement from major exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb, stakeholders are closely monitoring developments. Discussions on cryptocurrency forums and social media emphasize the potential impact on exchange compliance efforts and security enhancements. No-Fault Liability: Potential Game-Changer for Crypto Compliance Did you know? The concept of no-fault liability is already applied to South Korean banks for voice phishing cases, setting a precedent for proposed crypto exchange regulations. According to CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin (BTC), as of 06:31 UTC on December 7, 2025, has a market cap of $1.79 trillion. The 24-hour trading volume declined by 41.05%…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/07 14:37