The post Port3 Exploit Triggers Full Token Migration After Cross-Chain Vulnerability Exposes CATERC20 Weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Port3 suffered a critical exploit today. A single validation flaw inside Nexa Network’s cross-chain CATERC20 token standard opened the door to unauthorized minting and a rapid price collapse. What followed was a full-scale breakdown of the token’s security model, a multi-address exploit, and now a complete token migration to stabilize the ecosystem. The incident is not just another hack. It’s a textbook case of how a boundary-condition bug buried inside a cross-chain implementation can wipe out an entire token economy once ownership is renounced. And Port3 now confirms it is reissuing the token, burning team tokens to neutralize excess supply, and migrating entirely to BNB Chain. Here’s the full breakdown. A Vulnerability Hidden in CATERC20 Opened the Door Port3 integrated Nexa Network’s CATERC20 standard to support multi-chain expansion. The goal was to power easy cross-chain messaging and token movement across several ecosystems. But CATERC20 carried a critical vulnerability inside its boundary-condition validation logic. Once ownership of the Port3 token contract was renounced, a move intended to increase decentralization, the validation function started returning a value of 0. That value matched the owner-verification condition, causing the ownership check to fail. As a result, the system treated unauthorized addresses as valid. The flaw did not appear in the CATERC20 audit report. Port3’s renounced-ownership status placed the token in the exact configuration where the vulnerability could be triggered. And once discovered, it opened the door to full unauthorized access. Incident Report: $PORT3 Hacker Attack PORT3 aimed to support the development of multiple chains, and therefore adopted @nexa_network’s cross-chain token solution, CATERC20. However, CATERC20 contained a boundary-condition validation vulnerability. After the token’s ownership… — Port3 Network (@Port3Network) November 23, 2025 The Hacker’s First Move: Registering a Fake Authorized Address The attacker located the authorization-verification bug inside the Port3 BSC-side contract and moved quickly. At… The post Port3 Exploit Triggers Full Token Migration After Cross-Chain Vulnerability Exposes CATERC20 Weakness appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Port3 suffered a critical exploit today. A single validation flaw inside Nexa Network’s cross-chain CATERC20 token standard opened the door to unauthorized minting and a rapid price collapse. What followed was a full-scale breakdown of the token’s security model, a multi-address exploit, and now a complete token migration to stabilize the ecosystem. The incident is not just another hack. It’s a textbook case of how a boundary-condition bug buried inside a cross-chain implementation can wipe out an entire token economy once ownership is renounced. And Port3 now confirms it is reissuing the token, burning team tokens to neutralize excess supply, and migrating entirely to BNB Chain. Here’s the full breakdown. A Vulnerability Hidden in CATERC20 Opened the Door Port3 integrated Nexa Network’s CATERC20 standard to support multi-chain expansion. The goal was to power easy cross-chain messaging and token movement across several ecosystems. But CATERC20 carried a critical vulnerability inside its boundary-condition validation logic. Once ownership of the Port3 token contract was renounced, a move intended to increase decentralization, the validation function started returning a value of 0. That value matched the owner-verification condition, causing the ownership check to fail. As a result, the system treated unauthorized addresses as valid. The flaw did not appear in the CATERC20 audit report. Port3’s renounced-ownership status placed the token in the exact configuration where the vulnerability could be triggered. And once discovered, it opened the door to full unauthorized access. Incident Report: $PORT3 Hacker Attack PORT3 aimed to support the development of multiple chains, and therefore adopted @nexa_network’s cross-chain token solution, CATERC20. However, CATERC20 contained a boundary-condition validation vulnerability. After the token’s ownership… — Port3 Network (@Port3Network) November 23, 2025 The Hacker’s First Move: Registering a Fake Authorized Address The attacker located the authorization-verification bug inside the Port3 BSC-side contract and moved quickly. At…

Port3 Exploit Triggers Full Token Migration After Cross-Chain Vulnerability Exposes CATERC20 Weakness

Port3 suffered a critical exploit today. A single validation flaw inside Nexa Network’s cross-chain CATERC20 token standard opened the door to unauthorized minting and a rapid price collapse.

What followed was a full-scale breakdown of the token’s security model, a multi-address exploit, and now a complete token migration to stabilize the ecosystem.

The incident is not just another hack. It’s a textbook case of how a boundary-condition bug buried inside a cross-chain implementation can wipe out an entire token economy once ownership is renounced. And Port3 now confirms it is reissuing the token, burning team tokens to neutralize excess supply, and migrating entirely to BNB Chain.

Here’s the full breakdown.

A Vulnerability Hidden in CATERC20 Opened the Door

Port3 integrated Nexa Network’s CATERC20 standard to support multi-chain expansion. The goal was to power easy cross-chain messaging and token movement across several ecosystems.

But CATERC20 carried a critical vulnerability inside its boundary-condition validation logic.

Once ownership of the Port3 token contract was renounced, a move intended to increase decentralization, the validation function started returning a value of 0. That value matched the owner-verification condition, causing the ownership check to fail. As a result, the system treated unauthorized addresses as valid.

The flaw did not appear in the CATERC20 audit report.

Port3’s renounced-ownership status placed the token in the exact configuration where the vulnerability could be triggered. And once discovered, it opened the door to full unauthorized access.

The Hacker’s First Move: Registering a Fake Authorized Address

The attacker located the authorization-verification bug inside the Port3 BSC-side contract and moved quickly.

At 20:56:24 UTC, from address

0xb13A503dA5f368E48577c87b5d5AeC73d08f812E, the attacker executed a RegisterChains operation.

He registered his own address as an entity authorized to perform BridgeIn operations, the exact function needed to mint tokens during cross-chain transfers.

With that single move, the attacker became “trusted” by the contract due to the broken ownership check.

Minting 1 Billion Fake Tokens Through a Cross-Chain Fraud Path

Next, the attacker deployed a fake token on Arbitrum One. He initiated a cross-chain transaction that would normally go through CATERC20’s validation pipeline.

But the BSC-side Port3 contract failed to validate correctly.

Because the owner-verification condition returned 0, and because the attacker’s address was already registered, the transaction passed as legitimate. The contract proceeded to mint 1 billion PORT3 tokens.

Those tokens were immediately dumped across multiple DEXs, collapsing PORT3’s price from $0.03 to $0.0063 within minutes.

The attack didn’t stop there.

The same exploit was repeated using additional addresses, including:

0x7C2F4Bbda350D4423fBa6187dc49d84D125551fF

The result was a cascading liquidity shock that erased nearly all market value before operations were halted.

Port3 Responds: Exchange Coordination and Full Contract Migration

Within minutes of the exploit, Port3 moved to freeze movement across centralized platforms. Major exchanges were contacted to suspend deposits and withdrawals until the situation became clear..

Shortly after, Port3 announced the next steps: a full token migration with strict protection measures for users. The team emphasized that holders would not lose any tokens and that all legitimate balances before the exploit would be restored.

The Migration Plan: A Safeguard for All Users

Port3 outlined a detailed recovery process designed to restore stability across the ecosystem.

1. 1:1 Token Migration

A snapshot was taken at 20:56 UTC, immediately after the attack.

Every user holding PORT3 before that timestamp will receive a full 1:1 replacement.

The same guarantee applies to CEX balances once exchange coordination is finalized.

Port3 emphasized clearly: “Your tokens are SAFU.”

2. On-Chain Multi-Send Distribution

All addresses from the snapshot will receive their new tokens directly.

Port3 will use multi-send transactions of 200–500 tokens per tx, distributing to every affected wallet.

CEX migration details are still being finalized.

3. The New Token Lives Exclusively on BNB Chain

This was already hinted at in April, but now it becomes final.

All PORT3 liquidity on Ethereum was scheduled to migrate to BNB Chain. After the exploit, Port3 confirmed that the new token contract will be deployed only on BNB Chain going forward.

The move improves consistency, simplifies security management, and avoids repeating the multi-chain vulnerability path that enabled this attack.

4. Team Tokens Burned to Offset the Unauthorized Mint

The exploit created 1 billion unauthorized tokens during the minting attack.

To preserve total supply integrity, Port3 will burn 162,750,000 team tokens, fully neutralizing the excess and ensuring that the attacker receives nothing from the new contract.

This prevents inflation, restores supply balance, and closes the hole left by the exploit.

A Reset, Not a Shutdown, “The Team Is Here to Stay”

Port3 made one message clear:

  • The project is not going anywhere.

Despite the exploit, the team reiterated that development continues and that the ecosystem will recover stronger. The token migration is already underway, exchange reviews are happening in parallel, and trading will reopen once verification is complete.

Users were told to sit tight, avoid panic, and wait for the official restoration.

“All funds are SAFU.”

Conclusion: A Harsh Exploit, but a Full Rebuild Is Already in Motion

The Port3 exploit shows how fragile cross-chain token designs can be when a single validation pathway breaks. Once ownership was renounced, the CATERC20 flaw became catastrophic. A single boundary-condition error led to unauthorized registration, fake token minting, and a global price crash.

  • But the response has been fast, coordinated, and transparent.
  • The supply is being repaired.
  • The token is being migrated.
  • Users are protected.
  • And the attacker’s mint is being fully neutralized.

Port3 is moving forward, on a new contract, on a single chain, and with rebuilt tokenomics designed to ensure this never happens again.

Disclosure: This is not trading or investment advice. Always do your research before buying any cryptocurrency or investing in any services.

Follow us on Twitter @nulltxnews to stay updated with the latest Crypto, NFT, AI, Cybersecurity, Distributed Computing, and Metaverse news!

Source: https://nulltx.com/port3-exploit-triggers-full-token-migration-after-cross-chain-vulnerability-exposes-caterc20-weakness/

Market Opportunity
TokenFi Logo
TokenFi Price(TOKEN)
$0.004116
$0.004116$0.004116
-2.92%
USD
TokenFi (TOKEN) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XRP Price Prediction: Ripple CEO at Davos Predicts Crypto ATHs This Year – $5 XRP Next?

XRP Price Prediction: Ripple CEO at Davos Predicts Crypto ATHs This Year – $5 XRP Next?

XRP has traded near $1.90 as Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has predicted from Davos that the crypto market will reach new highs this year. Analysts have pointed
Share
Coinstats2026/01/22 04:49
What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration

The post What Is Jawboning? Jimmy Kimmel Suspension Sparks Legal Concerns About Trump Administration appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Topline Legal experts have raised concerns that ABC’s decision to pull “Jimmy Kimmel Live” from its airwaves following the host’s controversial comments about the death of Charlie Kirk, could be because the Trump administration violated free speech protections through a practice known as “jawboning.” Jimmy Kimmel speaks at Disney’s Advertising Upfront on May 13 in New York City. Disney via Getty Images Key Facts Disney-owned ABC announced Wednesday Kimmel’s show will be taken off the air “indefinitely,” which came after ABC affiliate owner Nexstar—which needs Federal Communications Commission approval to complete a planned acquisition of competitor Tegna Inc.—said it would not air the program due to Kimmel’s comments Monday regarding Kirk’s death and the reaction to it. The sudden move drew particular concern because it came only hours after FCC head Brendan Carr called for ABC to “take action” against Kimmel, and cryptically suggested his agency could take action saying, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way.” While ABC and Nexstar have not given any indication their decisions were influenced by Carr’s comments, the timing raised concerns among legal experts that the Trump administration’s threats may have unlawfully coerced ABC and Nexstar to punish Kimmel, which could constitute jawboning. Jawboning refers to “the use of official speech to inappropriately compel private action,” as defined by the Cato Institute, as governments or public officials—who cannot directly punish private actors for speech they don’t like—can use strongman tactics to try and indirectly silence critics or influence private companies’ actions. The practice is fairly loosely defined and there aren’t many legal safeguards dictating how violations of it are enforced, the Knight First Amendment Institute notes, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled it can be unlawful and an impermissible First Amendment violation when it involves specific threats. The White…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/19 07:17
Wormhole Unleashes W 2.0 Tokenomics for a Connected Blockchain Future

Wormhole Unleashes W 2.0 Tokenomics for a Connected Blockchain Future

TLDR Wormhole reinvents W Tokenomics with Reserve, yield, and unlock upgrades. W Tokenomics: 4% yield, bi-weekly unlocks, and a sustainable Reserve Wormhole shifts to long-term value with treasury, yield, and smoother unlocks. Stakers earn 4% base yield as Wormhole optimizes unlocks for stability. Wormhole’s new Tokenomics align growth, yield, and stability for W holders. Wormhole [...] The post Wormhole Unleashes W 2.0 Tokenomics for a Connected Blockchain Future appeared first on CoinCentral.
Share
Coincentral2025/09/18 02:07