BitcoinWorld Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with news of a significant transaction involving the Radiant Capital hacker. This event highlights the persistent security challenges within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem and raises questions about asset traceability and recovery. What Just Happened? The Radiant Capital Hacker’s Latest Move In a recent development, the individual or group responsible for the attack on the DeFi protocol Radiant Capital (RDNT) has made a substantial move. Reports from AmberCN indicate that the Radiant Capital hacker utilized 5.836 million DAI to acquire 14.82 million ETH. This Ethereum is valued at approximately $39.38 million, and the transaction occurred just an hour ago from the time of reporting. This conversion represents a critical step for the hacker. It demonstrates an effort to consolidate stolen assets into a more liquid and widely accepted cryptocurrency, potentially preparing for further obfuscation or off-ramping. The sheer volume of the transaction underscores the scale of the initial exploit. A History of Exploits: The Original Radiant Capital Hack This recent transaction by the Radiant Capital hacker is not an isolated incident. Radiant Capital previously endured a significant security breach in October of last year. That attack resulted in a staggering loss of $53 million. These repeated incidents raise serious concerns about the robustness of security measures within DeFi protocols. They also emphasize the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between protocol developers and malicious actors. Users and investors often bear the brunt of these exploits, leading to a loss of trust and capital. Why Convert DAI to ETH? Understanding the Radiant Capital Hacker’s Strategy One might wonder why a hacker would choose to convert stablecoins like DAI into a volatile asset like Ethereum. There are several strategic reasons behind such a move: Increased Liquidity: Ethereum (ETH) is one of the most liquid cryptocurrencies globally. It is easily tradable on virtually every exchange, making it simpler to move large sums without significant price impact. Enhanced Anonymity: While all blockchain transactions are public, converting assets across different chains or protocols can add layers of complexity. This makes it harder for investigators to trace the funds’ ultimate destination. Future Movements: ETH offers more flexibility for further transactions, including using mixers, bridges, or other privacy-enhancing tools. These tools are often less effective with stablecoins tied to specific networks. Avoiding Freezes: Centralized stablecoin issuers can sometimes freeze funds associated with illicit activities. Converting to a decentralized asset like ETH reduces this risk, though it does not eliminate it entirely. This strategic conversion by the Radiant Capital hacker indicates a calculated approach to managing and ultimately cashing out the illicit gains. The Broader Impact on DeFi Security Each successful hack, particularly one involving such large sums, sends ripples through the entire decentralized finance ecosystem. These events erode investor confidence and prompt closer scrutiny from regulators. The actions of the Radiant Capital hacker highlight: The continuous need for rigorous security audits and bug bounty programs for all DeFi protocols. The importance of robust incident response plans to mitigate damages and protect user funds. The ongoing challenge of fund recovery in a decentralized, permissionless environment. The DeFi space promises innovation and financial freedom, but it must also deliver on security to achieve widespread adoption. Protocols must learn from these incidents and implement stronger safeguards. Protecting Your Assets in a Volatile Landscape For individual users, staying informed and exercising caution is paramount. While protocols strive for security, vulnerabilities can emerge. Consider these actionable insights: Diversify your investments: Do not put all your funds into a single protocol. Research thoroughly: Understand the risks associated with any DeFi platform before depositing funds. Use reputable protocols: Opt for platforms with a strong track record and multiple security audits. Stay updated: Follow news and security alerts from the projects you interact with. The incident involving the Radiant Capital hacker serves as a stark reminder of the risks involved in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. While the community works towards more secure solutions, vigilance remains key. The audacious move by the Radiant Capital hacker to convert a significant amount of DAI into ETH is a stark reminder of the ongoing security challenges in the DeFi space. This event underscores the need for continuous vigilance, robust security measures, and a proactive approach from both protocols and users. As the crypto ecosystem matures, addressing these vulnerabilities will be crucial for fostering trust and ensuring long-term sustainability. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What exactly did the Radiant Capital hacker do recently? A1: The hacker converted 5.836 million DAI into 14.82 million ETH, valued at approximately $39.38 million, shortly after the initial exploit. Q2: What is Radiant Capital (RDNT)? A2: Radiant Capital (RDNT) is a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol that allows users to lend and borrow various cryptocurrencies across different blockchain networks. Q3: Why would a hacker convert DAI to ETH? A3: Hackers often convert stablecoins like DAI to more liquid and decentralized assets like ETH to enhance anonymity, facilitate easier movement of funds, and potentially avoid asset freezes by centralized entities. Q4: When was the previous Radiant Capital hack, and how much was lost? A4: Radiant Capital suffered a previous hack in October of last year, resulting in a loss of approximately $53 million. Q5: How does this incident impact the broader DeFi ecosystem? A5: Such incidents erode investor confidence, highlight the need for stronger security audits, and underscore the ongoing challenges in tracing and recovering stolen funds in the decentralized space. If you found this article insightful, please share it with your network to spread awareness about DeFi security and the latest developments. Your support helps us keep the community informed! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping DeFi security best practices. This post Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired first appeared on BitcoinWorld.BitcoinWorld Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with news of a significant transaction involving the Radiant Capital hacker. This event highlights the persistent security challenges within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem and raises questions about asset traceability and recovery. What Just Happened? The Radiant Capital Hacker’s Latest Move In a recent development, the individual or group responsible for the attack on the DeFi protocol Radiant Capital (RDNT) has made a substantial move. Reports from AmberCN indicate that the Radiant Capital hacker utilized 5.836 million DAI to acquire 14.82 million ETH. This Ethereum is valued at approximately $39.38 million, and the transaction occurred just an hour ago from the time of reporting. This conversion represents a critical step for the hacker. It demonstrates an effort to consolidate stolen assets into a more liquid and widely accepted cryptocurrency, potentially preparing for further obfuscation or off-ramping. The sheer volume of the transaction underscores the scale of the initial exploit. A History of Exploits: The Original Radiant Capital Hack This recent transaction by the Radiant Capital hacker is not an isolated incident. Radiant Capital previously endured a significant security breach in October of last year. That attack resulted in a staggering loss of $53 million. These repeated incidents raise serious concerns about the robustness of security measures within DeFi protocols. They also emphasize the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between protocol developers and malicious actors. Users and investors often bear the brunt of these exploits, leading to a loss of trust and capital. Why Convert DAI to ETH? Understanding the Radiant Capital Hacker’s Strategy One might wonder why a hacker would choose to convert stablecoins like DAI into a volatile asset like Ethereum. There are several strategic reasons behind such a move: Increased Liquidity: Ethereum (ETH) is one of the most liquid cryptocurrencies globally. It is easily tradable on virtually every exchange, making it simpler to move large sums without significant price impact. Enhanced Anonymity: While all blockchain transactions are public, converting assets across different chains or protocols can add layers of complexity. This makes it harder for investigators to trace the funds’ ultimate destination. Future Movements: ETH offers more flexibility for further transactions, including using mixers, bridges, or other privacy-enhancing tools. These tools are often less effective with stablecoins tied to specific networks. Avoiding Freezes: Centralized stablecoin issuers can sometimes freeze funds associated with illicit activities. Converting to a decentralized asset like ETH reduces this risk, though it does not eliminate it entirely. This strategic conversion by the Radiant Capital hacker indicates a calculated approach to managing and ultimately cashing out the illicit gains. The Broader Impact on DeFi Security Each successful hack, particularly one involving such large sums, sends ripples through the entire decentralized finance ecosystem. These events erode investor confidence and prompt closer scrutiny from regulators. The actions of the Radiant Capital hacker highlight: The continuous need for rigorous security audits and bug bounty programs for all DeFi protocols. The importance of robust incident response plans to mitigate damages and protect user funds. The ongoing challenge of fund recovery in a decentralized, permissionless environment. The DeFi space promises innovation and financial freedom, but it must also deliver on security to achieve widespread adoption. Protocols must learn from these incidents and implement stronger safeguards. Protecting Your Assets in a Volatile Landscape For individual users, staying informed and exercising caution is paramount. While protocols strive for security, vulnerabilities can emerge. Consider these actionable insights: Diversify your investments: Do not put all your funds into a single protocol. Research thoroughly: Understand the risks associated with any DeFi platform before depositing funds. Use reputable protocols: Opt for platforms with a strong track record and multiple security audits. Stay updated: Follow news and security alerts from the projects you interact with. The incident involving the Radiant Capital hacker serves as a stark reminder of the risks involved in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. While the community works towards more secure solutions, vigilance remains key. The audacious move by the Radiant Capital hacker to convert a significant amount of DAI into ETH is a stark reminder of the ongoing security challenges in the DeFi space. This event underscores the need for continuous vigilance, robust security measures, and a proactive approach from both protocols and users. As the crypto ecosystem matures, addressing these vulnerabilities will be crucial for fostering trust and ensuring long-term sustainability. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) Q1: What exactly did the Radiant Capital hacker do recently? A1: The hacker converted 5.836 million DAI into 14.82 million ETH, valued at approximately $39.38 million, shortly after the initial exploit. Q2: What is Radiant Capital (RDNT)? A2: Radiant Capital (RDNT) is a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol that allows users to lend and borrow various cryptocurrencies across different blockchain networks. Q3: Why would a hacker convert DAI to ETH? A3: Hackers often convert stablecoins like DAI to more liquid and decentralized assets like ETH to enhance anonymity, facilitate easier movement of funds, and potentially avoid asset freezes by centralized entities. Q4: When was the previous Radiant Capital hack, and how much was lost? A4: Radiant Capital suffered a previous hack in October of last year, resulting in a loss of approximately $53 million. Q5: How does this incident impact the broader DeFi ecosystem? A5: Such incidents erode investor confidence, highlight the need for stronger security audits, and underscore the ongoing challenges in tracing and recovering stolen funds in the decentralized space. If you found this article insightful, please share it with your network to spread awareness about DeFi security and the latest developments. Your support helps us keep the community informed! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping DeFi security best practices. This post Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired

2025/10/30 10:40

BitcoinWorld

Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired

The cryptocurrency world is buzzing with news of a significant transaction involving the Radiant Capital hacker. This event highlights the persistent security challenges within the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem and raises questions about asset traceability and recovery.

What Just Happened? The Radiant Capital Hacker’s Latest Move

In a recent development, the individual or group responsible for the attack on the DeFi protocol Radiant Capital (RDNT) has made a substantial move. Reports from AmberCN indicate that the Radiant Capital hacker utilized 5.836 million DAI to acquire 14.82 million ETH. This Ethereum is valued at approximately $39.38 million, and the transaction occurred just an hour ago from the time of reporting.

This conversion represents a critical step for the hacker. It demonstrates an effort to consolidate stolen assets into a more liquid and widely accepted cryptocurrency, potentially preparing for further obfuscation or off-ramping. The sheer volume of the transaction underscores the scale of the initial exploit.

A History of Exploits: The Original Radiant Capital Hack

This recent transaction by the Radiant Capital hacker is not an isolated incident. Radiant Capital previously endured a significant security breach in October of last year. That attack resulted in a staggering loss of $53 million.

These repeated incidents raise serious concerns about the robustness of security measures within DeFi protocols. They also emphasize the ongoing cat-and-mouse game between protocol developers and malicious actors. Users and investors often bear the brunt of these exploits, leading to a loss of trust and capital.

Why Convert DAI to ETH? Understanding the Radiant Capital Hacker’s Strategy

One might wonder why a hacker would choose to convert stablecoins like DAI into a volatile asset like Ethereum. There are several strategic reasons behind such a move:

  • Increased Liquidity: Ethereum (ETH) is one of the most liquid cryptocurrencies globally. It is easily tradable on virtually every exchange, making it simpler to move large sums without significant price impact.
  • Enhanced Anonymity: While all blockchain transactions are public, converting assets across different chains or protocols can add layers of complexity. This makes it harder for investigators to trace the funds’ ultimate destination.
  • Future Movements: ETH offers more flexibility for further transactions, including using mixers, bridges, or other privacy-enhancing tools. These tools are often less effective with stablecoins tied to specific networks.
  • Avoiding Freezes: Centralized stablecoin issuers can sometimes freeze funds associated with illicit activities. Converting to a decentralized asset like ETH reduces this risk, though it does not eliminate it entirely.

This strategic conversion by the Radiant Capital hacker indicates a calculated approach to managing and ultimately cashing out the illicit gains.

The Broader Impact on DeFi Security

Each successful hack, particularly one involving such large sums, sends ripples through the entire decentralized finance ecosystem. These events erode investor confidence and prompt closer scrutiny from regulators. The actions of the Radiant Capital hacker highlight:

  • The continuous need for rigorous security audits and bug bounty programs for all DeFi protocols.
  • The importance of robust incident response plans to mitigate damages and protect user funds.
  • The ongoing challenge of fund recovery in a decentralized, permissionless environment.

The DeFi space promises innovation and financial freedom, but it must also deliver on security to achieve widespread adoption. Protocols must learn from these incidents and implement stronger safeguards.

Protecting Your Assets in a Volatile Landscape

For individual users, staying informed and exercising caution is paramount. While protocols strive for security, vulnerabilities can emerge. Consider these actionable insights:

  • Diversify your investments: Do not put all your funds into a single protocol.
  • Research thoroughly: Understand the risks associated with any DeFi platform before depositing funds.
  • Use reputable protocols: Opt for platforms with a strong track record and multiple security audits.
  • Stay updated: Follow news and security alerts from the projects you interact with.

The incident involving the Radiant Capital hacker serves as a stark reminder of the risks involved in the rapidly evolving crypto landscape. While the community works towards more secure solutions, vigilance remains key.

The audacious move by the Radiant Capital hacker to convert a significant amount of DAI into ETH is a stark reminder of the ongoing security challenges in the DeFi space. This event underscores the need for continuous vigilance, robust security measures, and a proactive approach from both protocols and users. As the crypto ecosystem matures, addressing these vulnerabilities will be crucial for fostering trust and ensuring long-term sustainability.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What exactly did the Radiant Capital hacker do recently?
A1: The hacker converted 5.836 million DAI into 14.82 million ETH, valued at approximately $39.38 million, shortly after the initial exploit.

Q2: What is Radiant Capital (RDNT)?
A2: Radiant Capital (RDNT) is a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol that allows users to lend and borrow various cryptocurrencies across different blockchain networks.

Q3: Why would a hacker convert DAI to ETH?
A3: Hackers often convert stablecoins like DAI to more liquid and decentralized assets like ETH to enhance anonymity, facilitate easier movement of funds, and potentially avoid asset freezes by centralized entities.

Q4: When was the previous Radiant Capital hack, and how much was lost?
A4: Radiant Capital suffered a previous hack in October of last year, resulting in a loss of approximately $53 million.

Q5: How does this incident impact the broader DeFi ecosystem?
A5: Such incidents erode investor confidence, highlight the need for stronger security audits, and underscore the ongoing challenges in tracing and recovering stolen funds in the decentralized space.

If you found this article insightful, please share it with your network to spread awareness about DeFi security and the latest developments. Your support helps us keep the community informed!

To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping DeFi security best practices.

This post Radiant Capital Hacker’s Audacious Move: $39.4M ETH Acquired first appeared on BitcoinWorld.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact [email protected] for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023

The post Short-Term Bitcoin Profits Dominate For The First Time Since 2023 appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Bitcoin is making another attempt to break the downtrend that has kept the crypto king capped since late October. Price is hovering near $91,000 as investors watch a rare shift in market structure unfold.  For the first time in more than two and a half years, short-term holders have surpassed long-term holders in realized profits, creating both opportunities and risks for BTC. Sponsored Sponsored Bitcoin Sees Some Shift The MVRV Long/Short Difference highlights a notable change in Bitcoin’s profit distribution. A positive reading usually signals long-term holders hold more unrealized gains, while a negative value indicates short-term holders are ahead. In Bitcoin’s case, the difference has dipped into negative territory for the first time since March 2023. This marks 30 months since short-term holders last led in profits. Such dominance raises concerns because short-term holders tend to sell aggressively when volatility increases. Their profit-taking behavior could add pressure on BTC’s price if the broader market weakens, especially during attempts to break the downtrend. Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here. Bitcoin MVRV Long/Short Difference. Source: Santiment Sponsored Sponsored Despite this shift, Bitcoin’s broader momentum shows encouraging signs. Exchange net position change data confirms rising outflows across major platforms, signaling a shift in investor accumulation. BTC leaving exchanges is often treated as a bullish indicator, reflecting confidence in long-term appreciation. This trend suggests that many traders view the $90,000 range as a reasonable bottom zone and are preparing for a potential recovery. Sustained outflows support price stability and strengthen the probability of BTC breaking above immediate resistance levels. Bitcoin Exchange Net Position Change. Source: Glassnode BTC Price Is Trying Its Best Bitcoin is trading at $91,330 at the time of writing, positioned just below the $91,521 resistance. Reclaiming this level and flipping it into support…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 05:57
OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt

The post OKX founder responds to Moore Threads co-founder 1,500 BTC debt appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. The successful stock market debut of Moore Threads, a company that’s being touted as China’s answer to Nvidia, has been overshadowed by resurfaced allegations that link one of its co-founders to an unpaid cryptocurrency debt that has been lingering for roughly a decade. Shares in the GPU maker skyrocketed to as much as 470% on Thursday following its initial public offering (IPO) on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, valuing the company at around RMB 282 billion ($39.9 billion). However, as the success was being celebrated online, a social media post revived claims that Moore Threads’ co-founder Li Feng borrowed 1,500 Bitcoins from Mingxing “Star” Xu, founder and CEO of cryptocurrency exchange OKX, and never repaid the loan. Crypto past with OKX founder resurfaces In an X post, AB Kuai.Dong referenced Feng’s involvement in a 2017 initial coin offering that raised 5,000 ETH alongside controversial angel investor Xue Manzi. Feng allegedly dismissed the Bitcoin loan, stating, “It was just that Xu Mingxing’s investment in me had failed.” Xu responded to the post with a conciliatory message, writing, “People cannot always remain in the shadow of negative history. Face the future and contribute more positive energy.” He added, “Let the legal system handle the debt issue,” and offered blessings to every entrepreneur. Feng reportedly partnered with Xue Manzi and Li Xiaolai in 2017 to launch Malego Coin, which was later renamed Alpaca Coin MGD. The project reportedly raised approximately 5,000 ETH, but it was around this period that China banned ICOs, allowing regulators to crack down on what they viewed as speculative excess and potential fraud in the cryptocurrency sector. The Bitcoin loan dispute appears separate from the ICO controversy. According to sources familiar with the matter, the original loan agreement was dated December 17, 2014, with an expiry of December 16, 2016.…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 06:13
Solana Foundation calls out Kamino and Jupiter rivalry, directs focus on growth

Solana Foundation calls out Kamino and Jupiter rivalry, directs focus on growth

The post Solana Foundation calls out Kamino and Jupiter rivalry, directs focus on growth appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Lily Liu, the president of the Solana Foundation, has entered the growing feud between Kamino Finance, an established player in Solana’s lending market, and Jupiter Lend, a more recent entrant into the lending space.  Jupiter launched Jupiter Lend in August, and it has already grown to $1 billion in TVL. The Solana lending market is currently valued at around $5 billion, a number that is significantly dwarfed by Ethereum’s $50 billion and the trillions in TradFi collateral markets. Solana Foundation’s president does not mind the competition Lily Liu, president of the Solana Foundation, referenced the current valuation of Solana’s lending market in her post. That gap is what is fueling the competitive landscape in Solana’s lending sector. While it has led to rapid innovation, tensions have been rising between protocols vying for dominance. “Hey @kamino @jup_lend, Love you both,” she wrote. “…We can snipe at one another (one click lending position conversion; dunking on sloppy remarks; etc) or we can focus on capturing market share from all of crypto and then Tradfi beyond that.” As the Solana Foundation executive is concerned, competition has always been healthy for the space, but it is crucial not to lose sight of the main goal, which is capturing more market share from Ethereum and TradFi. Why are Kamino Finance and Jupiter Lend feuding? Jupiter Lend had had to contend with accusations that the protocol misled users about the platform’s risk isolation and rehypothecation practices, with critics (mostly founders from rival protocols like Kamino and Fluid) claiming that Jupiter Lend falsely advertised its vaults as completely isolated, an act that could potentially expose the broader DeFi space to contagion during market stress. While Kash Dhanda, Jupiter Lend’s co-founder, admitted that the initial “zero contagion” assertion was not 100% accurate, the executive insisted that rehypothecation occurs…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/12/08 06:40